教育关系网络:土著和女权主义世界。对Troy Richardson的回应

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Sharon Todd
{"title":"教育关系网络:土著和女权主义世界。对Troy Richardson的回应","authors":"Sharon Todd","doi":"10.1080/17449642.2023.2188755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper is a response to Troy Richardson’s Terence McLaughlin’s Lecture. In it, I discuss how Richardson provides a unique reading of relationality, drawing together technology studies, Indigenous Education and feminist philosophy of education. Seeking to walk with key ideas he develops, this response also points to a possible limitation in seeing Noddings ethic of care as part of a feminist relational ontology that can help inform new ways of understanding ‘machine learning’. In particular, I introduce the notion of worlding as a way of complementing Richardson’s reading of relationality – a notion that has profound implications for pedagogical practice.","PeriodicalId":45613,"journal":{"name":"Ethics and Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"23 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational relational networks: indigenous and feminist worlding. A response to Troy Richardson\",\"authors\":\"Sharon Todd\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17449642.2023.2188755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper is a response to Troy Richardson’s Terence McLaughlin’s Lecture. In it, I discuss how Richardson provides a unique reading of relationality, drawing together technology studies, Indigenous Education and feminist philosophy of education. Seeking to walk with key ideas he develops, this response also points to a possible limitation in seeing Noddings ethic of care as part of a feminist relational ontology that can help inform new ways of understanding ‘machine learning’. In particular, I introduce the notion of worlding as a way of complementing Richardson’s reading of relationality – a notion that has profound implications for pedagogical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics and Education\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"23 - 27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2023.2188755\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2023.2188755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文是对Troy Richardson的Terence McLaughlin讲座的回应。在这本书中,我讨论了理查森如何将技术研究、土著教育和女权主义教育哲学结合起来,提供了一种独特的关系解读。为了与他发展的关键思想同行,这一回应还指出,将Noddings护理伦理视为女权主义关系本体论的一部分可能存在局限性,这有助于为理解“机器学习”的新方式提供信息。特别是,我引入了世界化的概念,作为对理查森对关系性解读的补充——这一概念对教学实践有着深远的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Educational relational networks: indigenous and feminist worlding. A response to Troy Richardson
ABSTRACT This paper is a response to Troy Richardson’s Terence McLaughlin’s Lecture. In it, I discuss how Richardson provides a unique reading of relationality, drawing together technology studies, Indigenous Education and feminist philosophy of education. Seeking to walk with key ideas he develops, this response also points to a possible limitation in seeing Noddings ethic of care as part of a feminist relational ontology that can help inform new ways of understanding ‘machine learning’. In particular, I introduce the notion of worlding as a way of complementing Richardson’s reading of relationality – a notion that has profound implications for pedagogical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics and Education
Ethics and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信