评估最低限度干预龋病所需的认知实践能力

IF 1.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
A. M. C. Gil, E. A. Abreu, E. Godoy, Tahimí Saborit Carvajal, R. Iglesias
{"title":"评估最低限度干预龋病所需的认知实践能力","authors":"A. M. C. Gil, E. A. Abreu, E. Godoy, Tahimí Saborit Carvajal, R. Iglesias","doi":"10.32457/EJEP.V14I2.1631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research evaluates cognitive-practical capacities in the teaching-learning of cariology in the Stomatology career in Cuba, with the purpose of modifying and redesigning the teaching-learning processes of the study program. The methodology is descriptive and cross-sectional and arises from the assessment of the participants in Study Plan D. Teachers from all universities in the country were summoned and 177 responses were received. The instrument was previously validated and applied online. The variables were: institution, teaching category, years in teaching, participation in the preparation of the evaluated study program, scientific degree, research category, the items for the evaluation and components resulting from the previous factor analysis. The study plan was evaluated with 46.3% at a general level, between sufficient and insufficient, and 49.7% for both the program and the strategy, with significant dependence (p≤0.000), between the evaluation of both. In four of the six components (66.7%), the moderately sufficient category prevailed: planning of activities for the acquisition of cognitive-practical skills (57.1%), organization (50.8%), support (54 , 2%) and control (56.5%). The problems were found in the epidemiological monitoring component of the dental caries process (40.1%) and in the aspects of technological resources, activities in knowledge systems, requirements for laboratory practice scenarios, bibliography, and clinical techniques and procedures for the TMIC. In the comprehensive evaluation of the program, the didactic strategy, the cognitive-practical capacity, the components and individual aspects, the category of moderately sufficient prevailed.","PeriodicalId":44987,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education and Psychology","volume":"14 1","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluación de las capacidades cognitivo-prácticas necesarias para la mínima intervención en cariología\",\"authors\":\"A. M. C. Gil, E. A. Abreu, E. Godoy, Tahimí Saborit Carvajal, R. Iglesias\",\"doi\":\"10.32457/EJEP.V14I2.1631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research evaluates cognitive-practical capacities in the teaching-learning of cariology in the Stomatology career in Cuba, with the purpose of modifying and redesigning the teaching-learning processes of the study program. The methodology is descriptive and cross-sectional and arises from the assessment of the participants in Study Plan D. Teachers from all universities in the country were summoned and 177 responses were received. The instrument was previously validated and applied online. The variables were: institution, teaching category, years in teaching, participation in the preparation of the evaluated study program, scientific degree, research category, the items for the evaluation and components resulting from the previous factor analysis. The study plan was evaluated with 46.3% at a general level, between sufficient and insufficient, and 49.7% for both the program and the strategy, with significant dependence (p≤0.000), between the evaluation of both. In four of the six components (66.7%), the moderately sufficient category prevailed: planning of activities for the acquisition of cognitive-practical skills (57.1%), organization (50.8%), support (54 , 2%) and control (56.5%). The problems were found in the epidemiological monitoring component of the dental caries process (40.1%) and in the aspects of technological resources, activities in knowledge systems, requirements for laboratory practice scenarios, bibliography, and clinical techniques and procedures for the TMIC. In the comprehensive evaluation of the program, the didactic strategy, the cognitive-practical capacity, the components and individual aspects, the category of moderately sufficient prevailed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Education and Psychology\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Education and Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32457/EJEP.V14I2.1631\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32457/EJEP.V14I2.1631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估古巴口腔医师在口腔医学教学中的认知实践能力,目的是修改和重新设计研究计划的教学过程。该方法是描述性和横断面的,是根据对研究计划d的参与者的评价而产生的。我们召集了该国所有大学的教师,收到了177份答复。该仪器先前已在线验证和应用。变量是:机构,教学类别,教学年限,参与评估研究计划的准备,科学程度,研究类别,评估项目和先前因素分析得出的组成部分。研究计划的总体评价为46.3%,介于充分和不充分之间,计划和策略的评价均为49.7%,两者评价之间存在显著依赖关系(p≤0.000)。在六个组成部分中的四个(66.7%)中,中等充足的类别占主导地位:为获得认知实践技能而计划活动(57.1%)、组织(50.8%)、支持(54.2%)和控制(56.5%)。在龋病过程的流行病学监测部分(40.1%)、技术资源、知识系统活动、实验室实践场景要求、参考书目、TMIC的临床技术和程序等方面存在问题。在节目的综合评价中,教学策略、认知实践能力、组成部分和个体方面,中等充足的类别占主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluación de las capacidades cognitivo-prácticas necesarias para la mínima intervención en cariología
This research evaluates cognitive-practical capacities in the teaching-learning of cariology in the Stomatology career in Cuba, with the purpose of modifying and redesigning the teaching-learning processes of the study program. The methodology is descriptive and cross-sectional and arises from the assessment of the participants in Study Plan D. Teachers from all universities in the country were summoned and 177 responses were received. The instrument was previously validated and applied online. The variables were: institution, teaching category, years in teaching, participation in the preparation of the evaluated study program, scientific degree, research category, the items for the evaluation and components resulting from the previous factor analysis. The study plan was evaluated with 46.3% at a general level, between sufficient and insufficient, and 49.7% for both the program and the strategy, with significant dependence (p≤0.000), between the evaluation of both. In four of the six components (66.7%), the moderately sufficient category prevailed: planning of activities for the acquisition of cognitive-practical skills (57.1%), organization (50.8%), support (54 , 2%) and control (56.5%). The problems were found in the epidemiological monitoring component of the dental caries process (40.1%) and in the aspects of technological resources, activities in knowledge systems, requirements for laboratory practice scenarios, bibliography, and clinical techniques and procedures for the TMIC. In the comprehensive evaluation of the program, the didactic strategy, the cognitive-practical capacity, the components and individual aspects, the category of moderately sufficient prevailed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
7
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信