机器人应该如何接近两个人?

Adrian Ball, D. Rye, David Silvera-Tawil, Mari Velonaki
{"title":"机器人应该如何接近两个人?","authors":"Adrian Ball, D. Rye, David Silvera-Tawil, Mari Velonaki","doi":"10.5898/JHRI.6.3.Ball","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Experiments were conducted to quantify the direction of robot approach that a pair of seated people find most comfortable. Three maximally-different seating configurations and eight directions of robot approach were considered. The data were analysed using Rayleigh's test of uniformity, a directional statistics method. Results from 140 participants showed robot approach directions that minimise participant discomfort align spatially with regions that allow good sight of the robot by both people and are centred on the pair's largest unoccupied area of p-space.","PeriodicalId":92076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of human-robot interaction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How should a robot approach two people?\",\"authors\":\"Adrian Ball, D. Rye, David Silvera-Tawil, Mari Velonaki\",\"doi\":\"10.5898/JHRI.6.3.Ball\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Experiments were conducted to quantify the direction of robot approach that a pair of seated people find most comfortable. Three maximally-different seating configurations and eight directions of robot approach were considered. The data were analysed using Rayleigh's test of uniformity, a directional statistics method. Results from 140 participants showed robot approach directions that minimise participant discomfort align spatially with regions that allow good sight of the robot by both people and are centred on the pair's largest unoccupied area of p-space.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of human-robot interaction\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of human-robot interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.6.3.Ball\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of human-robot interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.6.3.Ball","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

研究人员进行了实验,量化了一对坐着的人觉得最舒服的机器人接近方向。考虑了三种最大不同的座位配置和机器人接近的八个方向。采用瑞利均匀性检验(一种定向统计方法)对数据进行了分析。来自140名参与者的结果表明,机器人接近的方向是最大限度地减少参与者的不适,在空间上与允许两个人都能看到机器人的区域保持一致,并且集中在两人最大的未占用的p空间区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How should a robot approach two people?
Experiments were conducted to quantify the direction of robot approach that a pair of seated people find most comfortable. Three maximally-different seating configurations and eight directions of robot approach were considered. The data were analysed using Rayleigh's test of uniformity, a directional statistics method. Results from 140 participants showed robot approach directions that minimise participant discomfort align spatially with regions that allow good sight of the robot by both people and are centred on the pair's largest unoccupied area of p-space.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信