17 -19世纪欧洲葡萄牙语中形容词在书信和叙事体裁中的位置/ 17 -19世纪欧洲葡萄牙语中形容词在书信和叙事中的位置

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
C. Prim, Thais Deschamps
{"title":"17 -19世纪欧洲葡萄牙语中形容词在书信和叙事体裁中的位置/ 17 -19世纪欧洲葡萄牙语中形容词在书信和叙事中的位置","authors":"C. Prim, Thais Deschamps","doi":"10.17851/2237-2083.30.4.1688-1718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This case-study analyzes the syntax of adnominal adjectives in 17th-19th century European Portuguese diachronically. We utilize syntactically and morphologically annotated data from the Tycho Brahe Project’s Parsed Corpus of Historical Portuguese. A total of five letters and four narratives written by authors born between the 17th and 19th centuries were analyzed. They yielded 7,996 valid DPs after manual verification of the data. Our hypothesis was that the shift in the preferential position of evaluative adjectives (from anteposition to postposition) would be observed first in text genres closer to orality, such as letters, and that such shift has not taken place in the same way for definite and indefinite DPs. The results confirm that there is a difference in the behavior of adjectives when we look at different text genres and determiners. We also provide a qualitative analysis of two letters, one from the 17th century and another from the 19th century, in order to investigate the concomitant effect of determiner types, adjective types, and noun types. The results show a preference for the anteposition of evaluative adjectives with definite determiners and with names [+human], but a preference for postposition with indefinite determiners and names [+human], in both the 17th and 19th centuries. In addition, the use of non-evaluative adjectives increased from the 17th to the 19th century, disproportionately favoring postposition.","PeriodicalId":42188,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudos da Linguagem","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Posição dos adjetivos nos gêneros cartas e narrativas em Português Europeu do século XVII ao XIX/ Adjective position in letters and narratives in European Portuguese during the 17th-19th centuries\",\"authors\":\"C. Prim, Thais Deschamps\",\"doi\":\"10.17851/2237-2083.30.4.1688-1718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": This case-study analyzes the syntax of adnominal adjectives in 17th-19th century European Portuguese diachronically. We utilize syntactically and morphologically annotated data from the Tycho Brahe Project’s Parsed Corpus of Historical Portuguese. A total of five letters and four narratives written by authors born between the 17th and 19th centuries were analyzed. They yielded 7,996 valid DPs after manual verification of the data. Our hypothesis was that the shift in the preferential position of evaluative adjectives (from anteposition to postposition) would be observed first in text genres closer to orality, such as letters, and that such shift has not taken place in the same way for definite and indefinite DPs. The results confirm that there is a difference in the behavior of adjectives when we look at different text genres and determiners. We also provide a qualitative analysis of two letters, one from the 17th century and another from the 19th century, in order to investigate the concomitant effect of determiner types, adjective types, and noun types. The results show a preference for the anteposition of evaluative adjectives with definite determiners and with names [+human], but a preference for postposition with indefinite determiners and names [+human], in both the 17th and 19th centuries. In addition, the use of non-evaluative adjectives increased from the 17th to the 19th century, disproportionately favoring postposition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Estudos da Linguagem\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Estudos da Linguagem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.30.4.1688-1718\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudos da Linguagem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.30.4.1688-1718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本案例分析了17-19世纪欧洲葡萄牙语中形容词的句法结构。我们使用了来自第谷·布拉赫项目的历史葡萄牙语解析语料库的语法和形态注释数据。对17世纪至19世纪出生的作家共写的五封信和四篇叙述进行了分析。在对数据进行手动验证后,他们得出了7996个有效DP。我们的假设是,评价形容词的优先位置的变化(从前置到后置)将首先在更接近口语的文本类型中观察到,例如字母,而这种变化在确定和不确定的DP中并没有以同样的方式发生。研究结果证实,当我们观察不同的文本类型和限定词时,形容词的行为存在差异。我们还对17世纪和19世纪的两个字母进行了定性分析,以研究限定词类型、形容词类型和名词类型的伴随效应。结果表明,在17世纪和19世纪,评价性形容词都倾向于带有确定的限定词和名称[+human]的前置词,但更倾向于带有不确定限定词和姓名[+human]的后置词。此外,从17世纪到19世纪,非评价性形容词的使用有所增加,尤其倾向于后置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Posição dos adjetivos nos gêneros cartas e narrativas em Português Europeu do século XVII ao XIX/ Adjective position in letters and narratives in European Portuguese during the 17th-19th centuries
: This case-study analyzes the syntax of adnominal adjectives in 17th-19th century European Portuguese diachronically. We utilize syntactically and morphologically annotated data from the Tycho Brahe Project’s Parsed Corpus of Historical Portuguese. A total of five letters and four narratives written by authors born between the 17th and 19th centuries were analyzed. They yielded 7,996 valid DPs after manual verification of the data. Our hypothesis was that the shift in the preferential position of evaluative adjectives (from anteposition to postposition) would be observed first in text genres closer to orality, such as letters, and that such shift has not taken place in the same way for definite and indefinite DPs. The results confirm that there is a difference in the behavior of adjectives when we look at different text genres and determiners. We also provide a qualitative analysis of two letters, one from the 17th century and another from the 19th century, in order to investigate the concomitant effect of determiner types, adjective types, and noun types. The results show a preference for the anteposition of evaluative adjectives with definite determiners and with names [+human], but a preference for postposition with indefinite determiners and names [+human], in both the 17th and 19th centuries. In addition, the use of non-evaluative adjectives increased from the 17th to the 19th century, disproportionately favoring postposition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Estudos da Linguagem
Revista de Estudos da Linguagem LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信