职前教师数学教学观念与教案设计从直接教学向改革教学转变

Q2 Mathematics
Ozgul Kartal, W. Tillett
{"title":"职前教师数学教学观念与教案设计从直接教学向改革教学转变","authors":"Ozgul Kartal, W. Tillett","doi":"10.1080/19477503.2020.1847988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study investigated preservice teachers’ (PTs) conceptions of how math is well-taught, their ability to design lessons that employ reform-based practices, and relations between their conceptions and lesson plans. We developed a survey and a rubric, in relation to the most recent standards and practices in U.S for the teaching and learning of math, to measure conceptions of how math is well-taught, and to measure the quality of a lesson plan. We designed and implemented a series of activities based on most recent reform-based standards and practices in a math methods course. The results showed significant change in PTs’ (n = 68) conceptions, however, there was not any significant relationship between their conceptions and their capability of designing reform-based lesson plans. While significant change occurred both in PTs’ conceptions and lesson-planning styles, the scores indicated that they were not yet fully convinced, nor fully capable. Suggestions and implications for teacher educators are discussed.","PeriodicalId":36817,"journal":{"name":"Investigations in Mathematics Learning","volume":"13 1","pages":"107 - 124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19477503.2020.1847988","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transforming Preservice Teachers’ Conceptions and Lesson Plan Designs for Teaching Mathematics from a Direct-Teaching Approach to a Reform-Based Approach\",\"authors\":\"Ozgul Kartal, W. Tillett\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19477503.2020.1847988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study investigated preservice teachers’ (PTs) conceptions of how math is well-taught, their ability to design lessons that employ reform-based practices, and relations between their conceptions and lesson plans. We developed a survey and a rubric, in relation to the most recent standards and practices in U.S for the teaching and learning of math, to measure conceptions of how math is well-taught, and to measure the quality of a lesson plan. We designed and implemented a series of activities based on most recent reform-based standards and practices in a math methods course. The results showed significant change in PTs’ (n = 68) conceptions, however, there was not any significant relationship between their conceptions and their capability of designing reform-based lesson plans. While significant change occurred both in PTs’ conceptions and lesson-planning styles, the scores indicated that they were not yet fully convinced, nor fully capable. Suggestions and implications for teacher educators are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigations in Mathematics Learning\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"107 - 124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19477503.2020.1847988\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigations in Mathematics Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2020.1847988\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigations in Mathematics Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2020.1847988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本研究调查了职前教师(PTs)对如何教好数学的概念,他们设计采用基于改革的实践的课程的能力,以及他们的概念和课程计划之间的关系。我们根据美国数学教学的最新标准和实践,制定了一项调查和一个标准,以衡量如何教好数学的概念,并衡量课程计划的质量。在数学方法课程中,我们根据最新的改革标准和实践设计并实施了一系列活动。结果显示,学生(n = 68)的观念发生了显著变化,但他们的观念与设计改革教案的能力之间没有显著的关系。虽然学生的观念和课程规划风格都发生了重大变化,但分数表明他们还没有完全相信,也没有完全有能力。讨论了对教师教育工作者的建议和启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transforming Preservice Teachers’ Conceptions and Lesson Plan Designs for Teaching Mathematics from a Direct-Teaching Approach to a Reform-Based Approach
ABSTRACT This study investigated preservice teachers’ (PTs) conceptions of how math is well-taught, their ability to design lessons that employ reform-based practices, and relations between their conceptions and lesson plans. We developed a survey and a rubric, in relation to the most recent standards and practices in U.S for the teaching and learning of math, to measure conceptions of how math is well-taught, and to measure the quality of a lesson plan. We designed and implemented a series of activities based on most recent reform-based standards and practices in a math methods course. The results showed significant change in PTs’ (n = 68) conceptions, however, there was not any significant relationship between their conceptions and their capability of designing reform-based lesson plans. While significant change occurred both in PTs’ conceptions and lesson-planning styles, the scores indicated that they were not yet fully convinced, nor fully capable. Suggestions and implications for teacher educators are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Investigations in Mathematics Learning
Investigations in Mathematics Learning Mathematics-Mathematics (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信