意外的支持能促进环境政策的可接受性吗？范数源与强度的实验研究
IF 1.8
Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
引用次数: 0
摘要
两个实验测试了美国保守派和自由派的环境政策可接受性如何受到操纵政策规范支持水平（少数群体与多数群体）和来源（群体内与群体外）的影响。来自928名MechanicalTurk用户的结果（研究1:N=268，研究2:N=660）表明，在评估组内政策（参与者希望自己的政治团体支持）时，与组内支持相比，沟通组外支持提高了可接受性。外群常模具有积极的间接影响，因为推断出群内人比群外人更支持政策。相反，在评估外群政策时，通过推断出群外人比群内人更支持，群内沟通的支持间接产生了比群外沟通的支持更高的可接受性。这种影响主要发生在具有强烈意识形态认同的个人身上，并且与支持水平无关（少数人与多数人）。结果表明，两党对环境政策的支持可以通过战略沟通有关政治团体的规范信息来实现。本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。
Can unexpected support promote environmental policy acceptability? An experimental investigation of norm source and strength
Two experiments tested how environmental policy acceptability of US conservatives and liberals was influenced by manipulating the level (minority vs. majority) and source (in-group vs. outgroup) of normative support for policy. Results from 928 MechanicalTurk users (Study 1: N = 268, Study 2: N = 660) indicated that when evaluating an in-group policy (that participants expect their own political group to support), communicating outgroup support increases acceptability compared with communicating in-group support. The outgroup norm has a positive indirect effect via the inference that the in-group is even more supportive of the policy than the outgroup is. In contrast, when evaluating an outgroup policy, communicating in-group support indirectly yields higher acceptability than communicating outgroup support, via the inference that the outgroup is more supportive than the in-group is. This effect mainly occurred for individuals with strong ideological identification and was independent of level of support (minority vs. majority). Results indicate that bipartisan support for environmental policies can be achieved by strategic communication of normative information about political groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。
去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Social and Political Psychology
Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
43
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Social and Political Psychology (JSPP) is a peer-reviewed open-access journal (without author fees), published online. It publishes articles at the intersection of social and political psychology that substantially advance the understanding of social problems, their reduction, and the promotion of social justice. It also welcomes work that focuses on socio-political issues from related fields of psychology (e.g., peace psychology, community psychology, cultural psychology, environmental psychology, media psychology, economic psychology) and encourages submissions with interdisciplinary perspectives. JSPP is comprehensive and integrative in its approach. It publishes high-quality work from different epistemological, methodological, theoretical, and cultural perspectives and from different regions across the globe. It provides a forum for innovation, questioning of assumptions, and controversy and debate. JSPP aims to give creative impetuses for academic scholarship and for applications in education, policymaking, professional practice, and advocacy and social action. It intends to transcend the methodological and meta-theoretical divisions and paradigm clashes that characterize the field of social and political psychology, and to counterbalance the current overreliance on the hypothetico-deductive model of science, quantitative methodology, and individualistic explanations by also publishing work following alternative traditions (e.g., qualitative and mixed-methods research, participatory action research, critical psychology, social representations, narrative, and discursive approaches). Because it is published online, JSPP can avoid a bias against research that requires more space to be presented adequately.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
