取消专家资格:以翻译专家为例

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Margarete Durr
{"title":"取消专家资格:以翻译专家为例","authors":"Margarete Durr","doi":"10.1515/les-2023-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of this article is to problematise the underestimation of the expert translator's competence due to the crisis of meta-narratives of legitimisation that affects experts in general and translators in particular. In the postmodern society, scientific knowledge and technical competence of experts are increasingly depreciated while the ordinary knowledge of non-specialists is experiencing an unprecedented valorisation. Given the exponential growth of the artificial intelligence techniques and the reduction of the translator's competence to the mastery of digital tools, these phenomena are amplifying and aggravating the crisis of meta-narratives, especially as regards translators. The result is imbalance in the discursive space of expertise which highlights the need to define expert competence, and – in particular – the translator's singular competence which is not exclusively linguistic. The author proposes an exhaustive analysis of the causes of the disqualification of the expert translator and suggests some ways to build a meta-narrative that would give the translator legitimacy both in terms of cognitive competence and in terms of social recognition.","PeriodicalId":35136,"journal":{"name":"Lebende Sprachen","volume":"68 1","pages":"58 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La disqualification de l’expert : Le cas de l’expert traducteur\",\"authors\":\"Margarete Durr\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/les-2023-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The aim of this article is to problematise the underestimation of the expert translator's competence due to the crisis of meta-narratives of legitimisation that affects experts in general and translators in particular. In the postmodern society, scientific knowledge and technical competence of experts are increasingly depreciated while the ordinary knowledge of non-specialists is experiencing an unprecedented valorisation. Given the exponential growth of the artificial intelligence techniques and the reduction of the translator's competence to the mastery of digital tools, these phenomena are amplifying and aggravating the crisis of meta-narratives, especially as regards translators. The result is imbalance in the discursive space of expertise which highlights the need to define expert competence, and – in particular – the translator's singular competence which is not exclusively linguistic. The author proposes an exhaustive analysis of the causes of the disqualification of the expert translator and suggests some ways to build a meta-narrative that would give the translator legitimacy both in terms of cognitive competence and in terms of social recognition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lebende Sprachen\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"58 - 74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lebende Sprachen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/les-2023-0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lebende Sprachen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/les-2023-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文的目的是质疑由于合法化的元叙事危机而对专家译者能力的低估,这种危机影响着一般专家,尤其是译者。在后现代社会,专家的科学知识和技术能力日益贬值,而非专家的普通知识正在经历前所未有的增值。鉴于人工智能技术的指数级增长和译者掌握数字工具的能力的下降,这些现象正在放大和加剧元叙事的危机,尤其是对译者而言。其结果是专业知识话语空间的不平衡,这突出了定义专家能力的必要性,尤其是译者的独特能力,而这不仅仅是语言能力。作者对专家译者不合格的原因进行了详尽的分析,并提出了一些构建元叙事的方法,以使译者在认知能力和社会认可方面都具有合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
La disqualification de l’expert : Le cas de l’expert traducteur
Abstract The aim of this article is to problematise the underestimation of the expert translator's competence due to the crisis of meta-narratives of legitimisation that affects experts in general and translators in particular. In the postmodern society, scientific knowledge and technical competence of experts are increasingly depreciated while the ordinary knowledge of non-specialists is experiencing an unprecedented valorisation. Given the exponential growth of the artificial intelligence techniques and the reduction of the translator's competence to the mastery of digital tools, these phenomena are amplifying and aggravating the crisis of meta-narratives, especially as regards translators. The result is imbalance in the discursive space of expertise which highlights the need to define expert competence, and – in particular – the translator's singular competence which is not exclusively linguistic. The author proposes an exhaustive analysis of the causes of the disqualification of the expert translator and suggests some ways to build a meta-narrative that would give the translator legitimacy both in terms of cognitive competence and in terms of social recognition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lebende Sprachen
Lebende Sprachen Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信