将最不发达国家排除在南极制度之外

IF 0.8 Q2 AREA STUDIES
A. Hemmings
{"title":"将最不发达国家排除在南极制度之外","authors":"A. Hemmings","doi":"10.1080/2154896X.2022.2058223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Antarctic regime makes bold claims for its general validity and open access to membership by any state which is a Member of the United Nations. However, the conditionalities around acquiring decision-making status in the regime – ‘conducting substantial scientific research activity there, such as the establishment of a scientific station or the despatch of a scientific expedition’ (Antarctic Treaty) or ‘research or harvesting activities’ (CCAMLR) – have installed a formidable glass ceiling subsequently reinforced by state practice. This has been fatal to the prospects for engagement in the ATS by most Global South states beyond the most powerful and emerging economies. The challenges facing poorer states are modelled through consideration of the most disadvantaged states, the Least Developed Countries (LDCs). This article explains the functional exclusion of the LDCs and explores why they should be given agency in the Antarctic regime. It examines the options for facilitating their participation and thus overcoming the present functional exclusion.","PeriodicalId":52117,"journal":{"name":"Polar Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"88 - 107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The functional exclusion of Least Developed Countries from the Antarctic regime\",\"authors\":\"A. Hemmings\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2154896X.2022.2058223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The Antarctic regime makes bold claims for its general validity and open access to membership by any state which is a Member of the United Nations. However, the conditionalities around acquiring decision-making status in the regime – ‘conducting substantial scientific research activity there, such as the establishment of a scientific station or the despatch of a scientific expedition’ (Antarctic Treaty) or ‘research or harvesting activities’ (CCAMLR) – have installed a formidable glass ceiling subsequently reinforced by state practice. This has been fatal to the prospects for engagement in the ATS by most Global South states beyond the most powerful and emerging economies. The challenges facing poorer states are modelled through consideration of the most disadvantaged states, the Least Developed Countries (LDCs). This article explains the functional exclusion of the LDCs and explores why they should be given agency in the Antarctic regime. It examines the options for facilitating their participation and thus overcoming the present functional exclusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polar Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"88 - 107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polar Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2022.2058223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polar Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2022.2058223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:南极制度大胆宣称其普遍有效性,并允许任何联合国会员国加入。然而,在该政权中获得决策地位的条件——“在那里进行大量的科学研究活动,例如建立科学站或派遣科学考察队”(《南极条约》)或“研究或收获活动”(南极海生委),安装了一个巨大的玻璃天花板,随后国家实践加强了这一天花板。这对最强大和新兴经济体之外的大多数全球南方国家参与ATS的前景是致命的。较贫穷国家面临的挑战是通过考虑最弱势的国家,即最不发达国家来模拟的。这篇文章解释了最不发达国家在功能上的排斥,并探讨了为什么应该在南极制度中给予它们代理权。它审查了为他们的参与提供便利的各种选择,从而克服目前的职能排斥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The functional exclusion of Least Developed Countries from the Antarctic regime
ABSTRACT The Antarctic regime makes bold claims for its general validity and open access to membership by any state which is a Member of the United Nations. However, the conditionalities around acquiring decision-making status in the regime – ‘conducting substantial scientific research activity there, such as the establishment of a scientific station or the despatch of a scientific expedition’ (Antarctic Treaty) or ‘research or harvesting activities’ (CCAMLR) – have installed a formidable glass ceiling subsequently reinforced by state practice. This has been fatal to the prospects for engagement in the ATS by most Global South states beyond the most powerful and emerging economies. The challenges facing poorer states are modelled through consideration of the most disadvantaged states, the Least Developed Countries (LDCs). This article explains the functional exclusion of the LDCs and explores why they should be given agency in the Antarctic regime. It examines the options for facilitating their participation and thus overcoming the present functional exclusion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polar Journal
Polar Journal Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Antarctica and the Arctic are of crucial importance to global security. Their governance and the patterns of human interactions there are increasingly contentious; mining, tourism, bioprospecting, and fishing are but a few of the many issues of contention, while environmental concerns such as melting ice sheets have a global impact. The Polar Journal is a forum for the scholarly discussion of polar issues from a social science and humanities perspective and brings together the considerable number of specialists and policy makers working on these crucial regions across multiple disciplines. The journal welcomes papers on polar affairs from all fields of the social sciences and the humanities and is especially interested in publishing policy-relevant research. Each issue of the journal either features articles from different disciplines on polar affairs or is a topical theme from a range of scholarly approaches. Topics include: • Polar governance and policy • Polar history, heritage, and culture • Polar economics • Polar politics • Music, art, and literature of the polar regions • Polar tourism • Polar geography and geopolitics • Polar psychology • Polar archaeology Manuscript types accepted: • Regular articles • Research reports • Opinion pieces • Book Reviews • Conference Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信