低收入和中等收入国家社会营销干预措施综述(2010-2019年)

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
D. Schmidtke, K. Kubacki, S. Rundle‐Thiele
{"title":"低收入和中等收入国家社会营销干预措施综述(2010-2019年)","authors":"D. Schmidtke, K. Kubacki, S. Rundle‐Thiele","doi":"10.1108/JSOCM-10-2020-0210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to review social marketing interventions reported in peer-reviewed literature from 2010 to 2019 that were conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This paper seeks to further contribute to understanding on the health of the social marketing field, synthesising studies to examine the extent of use of social marketing’s core principles.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA total of 17 interventions, discussed in 31 papers, were identified in the review. Social marketing interventions were assessed against eight elements (social marketing benchmark criteria): behavioural objectives, customer orientation, theory, insight, exchange, competition, segmentation and methods mix.\n\n\nFindings\nEvidence in this review found that most interventions yielded positive outcomes. This supports social marketing’s efficacy in addressing the United Nations sustainable development goals within LMIC contexts. None of the social marketing interventions used all eight benchmark criteria. The study found that there was limited use of insight, competition and segmentation principles followed in social marketing interventions in LMICs. Finally, although present in a number of studies, theory and customer orientation were not applied to the full extent needed.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nFindings indicate the social marketing field will greatly benefit from capacity building and training. Too few interventions labelled as social marketing are able to clearly apply and report application of social marketing’s fundamental principles, which is limiting programme effectiveness.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo date evidence reviews draw on interventions applied in high-income countries demonstrating extent of application of fundamental social marketing principles positively linked to behaviour change. This study extends the assessment of social marketing principles, delivering assessment of eight benchmarks encompassing insight and theory in an LMIC setting, demonstrating gaps in application and clear examples of application across all benchmarks to deliver a guide that people new to the social marketing field can follow.\n","PeriodicalId":51732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Marketing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of social marketing interventions in low- and middle-income countries (2010–2019)\",\"authors\":\"D. Schmidtke, K. Kubacki, S. Rundle‐Thiele\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/JSOCM-10-2020-0210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to review social marketing interventions reported in peer-reviewed literature from 2010 to 2019 that were conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This paper seeks to further contribute to understanding on the health of the social marketing field, synthesising studies to examine the extent of use of social marketing’s core principles.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nA total of 17 interventions, discussed in 31 papers, were identified in the review. Social marketing interventions were assessed against eight elements (social marketing benchmark criteria): behavioural objectives, customer orientation, theory, insight, exchange, competition, segmentation and methods mix.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nEvidence in this review found that most interventions yielded positive outcomes. This supports social marketing’s efficacy in addressing the United Nations sustainable development goals within LMIC contexts. None of the social marketing interventions used all eight benchmark criteria. The study found that there was limited use of insight, competition and segmentation principles followed in social marketing interventions in LMICs. Finally, although present in a number of studies, theory and customer orientation were not applied to the full extent needed.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nFindings indicate the social marketing field will greatly benefit from capacity building and training. Too few interventions labelled as social marketing are able to clearly apply and report application of social marketing’s fundamental principles, which is limiting programme effectiveness.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nTo date evidence reviews draw on interventions applied in high-income countries demonstrating extent of application of fundamental social marketing principles positively linked to behaviour change. This study extends the assessment of social marketing principles, delivering assessment of eight benchmarks encompassing insight and theory in an LMIC setting, demonstrating gaps in application and clear examples of application across all benchmarks to deliver a guide that people new to the social marketing field can follow.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":51732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Marketing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-10-2020-0210\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-10-2020-0210","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

本研究旨在回顾2010年至2019年同行评议文献中报道的在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)进行的社会营销干预。本文旨在进一步促进对健康的社会营销领域的理解,综合研究,以检查社会营销的核心原则的使用程度。设计/方法/方法本综述共确定了31篇论文中讨论的17种干预措施。社会营销干预是根据八个要素(社会营销基准标准)进行评估的:行为目标、客户导向、理论、洞察力、交流、竞争、细分和方法组合。本综述的证据表明,大多数干预措施产生了积极的结果。这支持了社会营销在中低收入国家背景下实现联合国可持续发展目标方面的功效。没有一项社会营销干预使用了全部8个基准标准。研究发现,在中低收入国家的社会营销干预中,洞察力、竞争和细分原则的使用有限。最后,虽然在一些研究中出现,但理论和顾客导向并没有得到充分的应用。研究局限/启示研究结果表明,社会营销领域将从能力建设和培训中受益匪浅。很少有贴上社会营销标签的干预措施能够清楚地应用和报告社会营销基本原则的应用,这限制了方案的有效性。原创性/价值迄今为止,证据审查借鉴了在高收入国家实施的干预措施,表明与行为改变积极相关的基本社会营销原则的应用程度。本研究扩展了对社会营销原则的评估,提供了八个基准的评估,包括LMIC环境下的洞察力和理论,展示了应用中的差距,并明确了所有基准的应用示例,为社会营销领域的新手提供了指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A review of social marketing interventions in low- and middle-income countries (2010–2019)
Purpose This study aims to review social marketing interventions reported in peer-reviewed literature from 2010 to 2019 that were conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This paper seeks to further contribute to understanding on the health of the social marketing field, synthesising studies to examine the extent of use of social marketing’s core principles. Design/methodology/approach A total of 17 interventions, discussed in 31 papers, were identified in the review. Social marketing interventions were assessed against eight elements (social marketing benchmark criteria): behavioural objectives, customer orientation, theory, insight, exchange, competition, segmentation and methods mix. Findings Evidence in this review found that most interventions yielded positive outcomes. This supports social marketing’s efficacy in addressing the United Nations sustainable development goals within LMIC contexts. None of the social marketing interventions used all eight benchmark criteria. The study found that there was limited use of insight, competition and segmentation principles followed in social marketing interventions in LMICs. Finally, although present in a number of studies, theory and customer orientation were not applied to the full extent needed. Research limitations/implications Findings indicate the social marketing field will greatly benefit from capacity building and training. Too few interventions labelled as social marketing are able to clearly apply and report application of social marketing’s fundamental principles, which is limiting programme effectiveness. Originality/value To date evidence reviews draw on interventions applied in high-income countries demonstrating extent of application of fundamental social marketing principles positively linked to behaviour change. This study extends the assessment of social marketing principles, delivering assessment of eight benchmarks encompassing insight and theory in an LMIC setting, demonstrating gaps in application and clear examples of application across all benchmarks to deliver a guide that people new to the social marketing field can follow.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
29.20%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信