放牧是加州沿海草地生态保护的有效手段——基于8年植被动态的研究

IF 2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Andrew W. Evans, Brian D. Woodward, A. Christy Wyckoff, David Toledo, Sara Duke, Christy Fischer, Claudio Núñez, Rodrigo Sierra-Corona
{"title":"放牧是加州沿海草地生态保护的有效手段——基于8年植被动态的研究","authors":"Andrew W. Evans,&nbsp;Brian D. Woodward,&nbsp;A. Christy Wyckoff,&nbsp;David Toledo,&nbsp;Sara Duke,&nbsp;Christy Fischer,&nbsp;Claudio Núñez,&nbsp;Rodrigo Sierra-Corona","doi":"10.1111/avsc.12736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Questions</h3>\n \n <div>Livestock grazing is an expanding land management tool for habitat and fuel management in California grassland ecosystems, despite mixed conclusions about its effects. Our study investigated the following questions:\n\n <ul>\n \n <li>Does a targeted grazing regime promote grassland functioning by clearing bare ground and reducing dead litter cover?</li>\n \n <li>Does targeted grazing reduce grassland fuels?</li>\n \n <li>Does targeted grazing promote native species cover and diversity?</li>\n \n <li>Does targeted grazing reduce non-native, invasive species cover and diversity?</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>The Santa Lucia Preserve, Carmel, California, USA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Monitoring grazed and ungrazed treatment plots within 17 study sites, we surveyed the effects of a targeted grazing regime on bare ground cover, litter cover and depth, herb height, and diversity and cover of different native and non-native species groups over an eight-year period.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>On average, grazing successfully increased bare ground (by 2.8% cover), decreased litter depth (by 3.5 cm) and cover (by 12%), and decreased herb height (by 3.9 cm). Grazed plots had greater cover of native annual forbs (+1.2% cover), while decreasing invasive <i>Bromus diandrus</i> (by 6.0% cover). There was no difference in either native or non-native species diversity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Targeted grazing can be an appropriate tool to accomplish conservation goals, including biomass management and canopy clearing, while improving native annual forbs without risk to native species as a whole. Further steps in adaptive management must examine how the application of grazing may be altered to further promote native species and to inhibit invasive species.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55494,"journal":{"name":"Applied Vegetation Science","volume":"26 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Livestock grazing is an effective conservation tool for Californian coastal grassland ecology: An eight-year study on vegetation dynamics\",\"authors\":\"Andrew W. Evans,&nbsp;Brian D. Woodward,&nbsp;A. Christy Wyckoff,&nbsp;David Toledo,&nbsp;Sara Duke,&nbsp;Christy Fischer,&nbsp;Claudio Núñez,&nbsp;Rodrigo Sierra-Corona\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/avsc.12736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Questions</h3>\\n \\n <div>Livestock grazing is an expanding land management tool for habitat and fuel management in California grassland ecosystems, despite mixed conclusions about its effects. Our study investigated the following questions:\\n\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>Does a targeted grazing regime promote grassland functioning by clearing bare ground and reducing dead litter cover?</li>\\n \\n <li>Does targeted grazing reduce grassland fuels?</li>\\n \\n <li>Does targeted grazing promote native species cover and diversity?</li>\\n \\n <li>Does targeted grazing reduce non-native, invasive species cover and diversity?</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Santa Lucia Preserve, Carmel, California, USA.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Monitoring grazed and ungrazed treatment plots within 17 study sites, we surveyed the effects of a targeted grazing regime on bare ground cover, litter cover and depth, herb height, and diversity and cover of different native and non-native species groups over an eight-year period.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>On average, grazing successfully increased bare ground (by 2.8% cover), decreased litter depth (by 3.5 cm) and cover (by 12%), and decreased herb height (by 3.9 cm). Grazed plots had greater cover of native annual forbs (+1.2% cover), while decreasing invasive <i>Bromus diandrus</i> (by 6.0% cover). There was no difference in either native or non-native species diversity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Targeted grazing can be an appropriate tool to accomplish conservation goals, including biomass management and canopy clearing, while improving native annual forbs without risk to native species as a whole. Further steps in adaptive management must examine how the application of grazing may be altered to further promote native species and to inhibit invasive species.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Vegetation Science\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Vegetation Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/avsc.12736\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Vegetation Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/avsc.12736","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在加州草原生态系统中,放牧牲畜是一种不断扩大的土地管理工具,用于栖息地和燃料管理,尽管对其影响的结论不一。我们的研究调查了以下问题:有针对性的放牧制度是否通过清除裸地和减少枯死物覆盖来促进草地的功能?有针对性的放牧会减少草地燃料吗?有针对性的放牧是否促进了本地物种的覆盖和多样性?有针对性的放牧是否会减少非本地入侵物种的覆盖和多样性?地点:圣卢西亚自然保护区,卡梅尔,加利福尼亚,美国。方法对17个研究点的放牧和未放牧处理样地进行监测,在8年的时间里,研究了有针对性的放牧制度对裸地覆盖、凋落物覆盖和深度、草本植物高度以及不同本地和非本地物种群多样性和覆盖的影响。结果平均放牧成功地增加了裸地(覆盖面积2.8%),减少了凋落物深度(3.5 cm)和覆盖面积(12%),降低了草本植物高度(3.9 cm)。放牧样地本地一年生草本植物盖度增加1.2%,而入侵凤梨盖度减少6.0%。本地和非本地物种多样性无显著差异。结论有针对性的放牧可以在不影响本地物种整体的情况下,实现包括生物量管理和林冠清理在内的保护目标,同时改善本地一年生牧草。适应性管理的进一步步骤必须研究如何改变放牧的应用,以进一步促进本地物种和抑制入侵物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Livestock grazing is an effective conservation tool for Californian coastal grassland ecology: An eight-year study on vegetation dynamics

Livestock grazing is an effective conservation tool for Californian coastal grassland ecology: An eight-year study on vegetation dynamics

Questions

Livestock grazing is an expanding land management tool for habitat and fuel management in California grassland ecosystems, despite mixed conclusions about its effects. Our study investigated the following questions:
  • Does a targeted grazing regime promote grassland functioning by clearing bare ground and reducing dead litter cover?
  • Does targeted grazing reduce grassland fuels?
  • Does targeted grazing promote native species cover and diversity?
  • Does targeted grazing reduce non-native, invasive species cover and diversity?

Location

The Santa Lucia Preserve, Carmel, California, USA.

Methods

Monitoring grazed and ungrazed treatment plots within 17 study sites, we surveyed the effects of a targeted grazing regime on bare ground cover, litter cover and depth, herb height, and diversity and cover of different native and non-native species groups over an eight-year period.

Results

On average, grazing successfully increased bare ground (by 2.8% cover), decreased litter depth (by 3.5 cm) and cover (by 12%), and decreased herb height (by 3.9 cm). Grazed plots had greater cover of native annual forbs (+1.2% cover), while decreasing invasive Bromus diandrus (by 6.0% cover). There was no difference in either native or non-native species diversity.

Conclusions

Targeted grazing can be an appropriate tool to accomplish conservation goals, including biomass management and canopy clearing, while improving native annual forbs without risk to native species as a whole. Further steps in adaptive management must examine how the application of grazing may be altered to further promote native species and to inhibit invasive species.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Vegetation Science
Applied Vegetation Science 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.70%
发文量
67
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Vegetation Science focuses on community-level topics relevant to human interaction with vegetation, including global change, nature conservation, nature management, restoration of plant communities and of natural habitats, and the planning of semi-natural and urban landscapes. Vegetation survey, modelling and remote-sensing applications are welcome. Papers on vegetation science which do not fit to this scope (do not have an applied aspect and are not vegetation survey) should be directed to our associate journal, the Journal of Vegetation Science. Both journals publish papers on the ecology of a single species only if it plays a key role in structuring plant communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信