Andrew W. Evans, Brian D. Woodward, A. Christy Wyckoff, David Toledo, Sara Duke, Christy Fischer, Claudio Núñez, Rodrigo Sierra-Corona
{"title":"放牧是加州沿海草地生态保护的有效手段——基于8年植被动态的研究","authors":"Andrew W. Evans, Brian D. Woodward, A. Christy Wyckoff, David Toledo, Sara Duke, Christy Fischer, Claudio Núñez, Rodrigo Sierra-Corona","doi":"10.1111/avsc.12736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Questions</h3>\n \n <div>Livestock grazing is an expanding land management tool for habitat and fuel management in California grassland ecosystems, despite mixed conclusions about its effects. Our study investigated the following questions:\n\n <ul>\n \n <li>Does a targeted grazing regime promote grassland functioning by clearing bare ground and reducing dead litter cover?</li>\n \n <li>Does targeted grazing reduce grassland fuels?</li>\n \n <li>Does targeted grazing promote native species cover and diversity?</li>\n \n <li>Does targeted grazing reduce non-native, invasive species cover and diversity?</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>The Santa Lucia Preserve, Carmel, California, USA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Monitoring grazed and ungrazed treatment plots within 17 study sites, we surveyed the effects of a targeted grazing regime on bare ground cover, litter cover and depth, herb height, and diversity and cover of different native and non-native species groups over an eight-year period.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>On average, grazing successfully increased bare ground (by 2.8% cover), decreased litter depth (by 3.5 cm) and cover (by 12%), and decreased herb height (by 3.9 cm). Grazed plots had greater cover of native annual forbs (+1.2% cover), while decreasing invasive <i>Bromus diandrus</i> (by 6.0% cover). There was no difference in either native or non-native species diversity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Targeted grazing can be an appropriate tool to accomplish conservation goals, including biomass management and canopy clearing, while improving native annual forbs without risk to native species as a whole. Further steps in adaptive management must examine how the application of grazing may be altered to further promote native species and to inhibit invasive species.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55494,"journal":{"name":"Applied Vegetation Science","volume":"26 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Livestock grazing is an effective conservation tool for Californian coastal grassland ecology: An eight-year study on vegetation dynamics\",\"authors\":\"Andrew W. Evans, Brian D. Woodward, A. Christy Wyckoff, David Toledo, Sara Duke, Christy Fischer, Claudio Núñez, Rodrigo Sierra-Corona\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/avsc.12736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Questions</h3>\\n \\n <div>Livestock grazing is an expanding land management tool for habitat and fuel management in California grassland ecosystems, despite mixed conclusions about its effects. Our study investigated the following questions:\\n\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>Does a targeted grazing regime promote grassland functioning by clearing bare ground and reducing dead litter cover?</li>\\n \\n <li>Does targeted grazing reduce grassland fuels?</li>\\n \\n <li>Does targeted grazing promote native species cover and diversity?</li>\\n \\n <li>Does targeted grazing reduce non-native, invasive species cover and diversity?</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Santa Lucia Preserve, Carmel, California, USA.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Monitoring grazed and ungrazed treatment plots within 17 study sites, we surveyed the effects of a targeted grazing regime on bare ground cover, litter cover and depth, herb height, and diversity and cover of different native and non-native species groups over an eight-year period.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>On average, grazing successfully increased bare ground (by 2.8% cover), decreased litter depth (by 3.5 cm) and cover (by 12%), and decreased herb height (by 3.9 cm). Grazed plots had greater cover of native annual forbs (+1.2% cover), while decreasing invasive <i>Bromus diandrus</i> (by 6.0% cover). There was no difference in either native or non-native species diversity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Targeted grazing can be an appropriate tool to accomplish conservation goals, including biomass management and canopy clearing, while improving native annual forbs without risk to native species as a whole. Further steps in adaptive management must examine how the application of grazing may be altered to further promote native species and to inhibit invasive species.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Vegetation Science\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Vegetation Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/avsc.12736\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Vegetation Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/avsc.12736","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Livestock grazing is an effective conservation tool for Californian coastal grassland ecology: An eight-year study on vegetation dynamics
Questions
Livestock grazing is an expanding land management tool for habitat and fuel management in California grassland ecosystems, despite mixed conclusions about its effects. Our study investigated the following questions:
Does a targeted grazing regime promote grassland functioning by clearing bare ground and reducing dead litter cover?
Does targeted grazing reduce grassland fuels?
Does targeted grazing promote native species cover and diversity?
Does targeted grazing reduce non-native, invasive species cover and diversity?
Location
The Santa Lucia Preserve, Carmel, California, USA.
Methods
Monitoring grazed and ungrazed treatment plots within 17 study sites, we surveyed the effects of a targeted grazing regime on bare ground cover, litter cover and depth, herb height, and diversity and cover of different native and non-native species groups over an eight-year period.
Results
On average, grazing successfully increased bare ground (by 2.8% cover), decreased litter depth (by 3.5 cm) and cover (by 12%), and decreased herb height (by 3.9 cm). Grazed plots had greater cover of native annual forbs (+1.2% cover), while decreasing invasive Bromus diandrus (by 6.0% cover). There was no difference in either native or non-native species diversity.
Conclusions
Targeted grazing can be an appropriate tool to accomplish conservation goals, including biomass management and canopy clearing, while improving native annual forbs without risk to native species as a whole. Further steps in adaptive management must examine how the application of grazing may be altered to further promote native species and to inhibit invasive species.
期刊介绍:
Applied Vegetation Science focuses on community-level topics relevant to human interaction with vegetation, including global change, nature conservation, nature management, restoration of plant communities and of natural habitats, and the planning of semi-natural and urban landscapes. Vegetation survey, modelling and remote-sensing applications are welcome. Papers on vegetation science which do not fit to this scope (do not have an applied aspect and are not vegetation survey) should be directed to our associate journal, the Journal of Vegetation Science. Both journals publish papers on the ecology of a single species only if it plays a key role in structuring plant communities.