在社会研究中支持小学职前教师的学术语言发展

Q2 Social Sciences
Melissa Wrenn, J. Stanley
{"title":"在社会研究中支持小学职前教师的学术语言发展","authors":"Melissa Wrenn, J. Stanley","doi":"10.1080/01626620.2021.1987352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this action research study, we investigated pre-service teachers’ (n = 39) perceptions of academic language and strategies in order to support their abilities to plan and teach elementary social studies. Using mixed methods triangulation design, we analyzed edTPA SCORES, pre-assessments, post-assessments, videos of teaching, field notes, self-reflections, and other artifacts. Data analysis occurred in two phases. In Phase 1, we analyzed the success of each action research cycle and determined how to adjust instruction. In Phase 2, we conducted retrospective analysis that began with structural coding of the assessments and included a constant comparative analysis of the themes against quantitative data. Results indicate that as participants developed increased meta-language, became critically aware of their own strengths and weaknesses in planning and modeling academic language, and broadened their definitions of academic language. Additionally, we identified several strategies that supported participants’ growth for each theme.","PeriodicalId":52183,"journal":{"name":"Action in Teacher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting Elementary Pre-Service Teachers’ Academic Language Development in Social Studies\",\"authors\":\"Melissa Wrenn, J. Stanley\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01626620.2021.1987352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this action research study, we investigated pre-service teachers’ (n = 39) perceptions of academic language and strategies in order to support their abilities to plan and teach elementary social studies. Using mixed methods triangulation design, we analyzed edTPA SCORES, pre-assessments, post-assessments, videos of teaching, field notes, self-reflections, and other artifacts. Data analysis occurred in two phases. In Phase 1, we analyzed the success of each action research cycle and determined how to adjust instruction. In Phase 2, we conducted retrospective analysis that began with structural coding of the assessments and included a constant comparative analysis of the themes against quantitative data. Results indicate that as participants developed increased meta-language, became critically aware of their own strengths and weaknesses in planning and modeling academic language, and broadened their definitions of academic language. Additionally, we identified several strategies that supported participants’ growth for each theme.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Action in Teacher Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Action in Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2021.1987352\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Action in Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2021.1987352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本行动研究中,我们调查了职前教师(n = 39)对学术语言和策略的感知,以支持他们计划和教授基础社会研究的能力。使用混合方法三角设计,我们分析了edTPA分数、预评估、后评估、教学视频、实地笔记、自我反思和其他人工制品。数据分析分两个阶段进行。在第一阶段,我们分析了每个行动研究周期的成功,并确定了如何调整教学。在第二阶段,我们进行了回顾性分析,从评估的结构编码开始,包括对定量数据的主题进行持续的比较分析。结果表明,随着参与者发展了更多的元语言,他们开始批判性地意识到自己在规划和建模学术语言方面的优势和劣势,并拓宽了他们对学术语言的定义。此外,我们确定了支持每个主题参与者成长的几种策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supporting Elementary Pre-Service Teachers’ Academic Language Development in Social Studies
ABSTRACT In this action research study, we investigated pre-service teachers’ (n = 39) perceptions of academic language and strategies in order to support their abilities to plan and teach elementary social studies. Using mixed methods triangulation design, we analyzed edTPA SCORES, pre-assessments, post-assessments, videos of teaching, field notes, self-reflections, and other artifacts. Data analysis occurred in two phases. In Phase 1, we analyzed the success of each action research cycle and determined how to adjust instruction. In Phase 2, we conducted retrospective analysis that began with structural coding of the assessments and included a constant comparative analysis of the themes against quantitative data. Results indicate that as participants developed increased meta-language, became critically aware of their own strengths and weaknesses in planning and modeling academic language, and broadened their definitions of academic language. Additionally, we identified several strategies that supported participants’ growth for each theme.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Action in Teacher Education
Action in Teacher Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信