主权的阴影:理解国际政治中的主权

Apekshya Shah
{"title":"主权的阴影:理解国际政治中的主权","authors":"Apekshya Shah","doi":"10.3126/JOIA.V2I1.22574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Correction: On 29th June 2020, the author's name was changed from Apkeshya Shah TO Apekshya Shah. \nThis paper analyses the concept of Westphalian sovereignty and its practices among states, particularly in the bilateral relationship between Nepal and India. The notion of Westphalian sovereignty, basically a principle of non-intervention in the internal matters of other states, has been a contested concept since the beginning of its inception. Despite numerous international agreements, system-affecting and system-influencing countries have not refrained from meddling into the internal affairs of system-ineffectual states. Taking the issue of alleged Indian interference in Nepal's internal affairs into consideration, this paper examines levels and degrees of correction in accusations and assertions. And if it is correct then how can we understand it better. The first part of the paper discusses the conceptual frame of state sovereignty and its evolution over time. Then, the issue of the exercise of sovereignty is explored and, concurrently, the compromise of state sovereignty is also explained before analysing Nepal-India relations. Next, the Nepal-India relations are analysed.","PeriodicalId":81668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of international affairs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3126/JOIA.V2I1.22574","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shades of Sovereignty: Understanding Sovereignty in International Politics\",\"authors\":\"Apekshya Shah\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/JOIA.V2I1.22574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Correction: On 29th June 2020, the author's name was changed from Apkeshya Shah TO Apekshya Shah. \\nThis paper analyses the concept of Westphalian sovereignty and its practices among states, particularly in the bilateral relationship between Nepal and India. The notion of Westphalian sovereignty, basically a principle of non-intervention in the internal matters of other states, has been a contested concept since the beginning of its inception. Despite numerous international agreements, system-affecting and system-influencing countries have not refrained from meddling into the internal affairs of system-ineffectual states. Taking the issue of alleged Indian interference in Nepal's internal affairs into consideration, this paper examines levels and degrees of correction in accusations and assertions. And if it is correct then how can we understand it better. The first part of the paper discusses the conceptual frame of state sovereignty and its evolution over time. Then, the issue of the exercise of sovereignty is explored and, concurrently, the compromise of state sovereignty is also explained before analysing Nepal-India relations. Next, the Nepal-India relations are analysed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of international affairs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3126/JOIA.V2I1.22574\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of international affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/JOIA.V2I1.22574\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of international affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/JOIA.V2I1.22574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

更正:2020年6月29日,提交人的名字从Apkeshya Shah改为Apekhya Shah。本文分析了威斯特伐利亚主权的概念及其在国家间的实践,特别是在尼泊尔和印度的双边关系中。威斯特伐利亚主权的概念,基本上是一项不干涉其他国家内政的原则,自成立以来一直是一个有争议的概念。尽管有许多国际协议,但影响制度和影响制度的国家都没有避免干涉制度无效国家的内政。考虑到所谓印度干涉尼泊尔内政的问题,本文审查了指控和断言的纠正程度和程度。如果它是正确的,那么我们如何才能更好地理解它。本文的第一部分讨论了国家主权的概念框架及其随时间的演变。然后,在分析尼印关系之前,探讨了行使主权的问题,同时也解释了国家主权的妥协。其次,分析了尼泊尔与印度的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shades of Sovereignty: Understanding Sovereignty in International Politics
Correction: On 29th June 2020, the author's name was changed from Apkeshya Shah TO Apekshya Shah. This paper analyses the concept of Westphalian sovereignty and its practices among states, particularly in the bilateral relationship between Nepal and India. The notion of Westphalian sovereignty, basically a principle of non-intervention in the internal matters of other states, has been a contested concept since the beginning of its inception. Despite numerous international agreements, system-affecting and system-influencing countries have not refrained from meddling into the internal affairs of system-ineffectual states. Taking the issue of alleged Indian interference in Nepal's internal affairs into consideration, this paper examines levels and degrees of correction in accusations and assertions. And if it is correct then how can we understand it better. The first part of the paper discusses the conceptual frame of state sovereignty and its evolution over time. Then, the issue of the exercise of sovereignty is explored and, concurrently, the compromise of state sovereignty is also explained before analysing Nepal-India relations. Next, the Nepal-India relations are analysed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信