数据收集平台对开放式回应质量的影响

IF 1.6 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
E. E. T. Horr, J. Heimlich
{"title":"数据收集平台对开放式回应质量的影响","authors":"E. E. T. Horr, J. Heimlich","doi":"10.1080/10645578.2018.1503877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although the validity of collecting quantitative data using electronic platforms has been widely accepted, there has been concern that qualitative data collected on an electronic platform may not provide the same depth and richness in response quality as data collected using the pen-and-paper format. This article compares the quality of responses to open-ended questions collected using the pen-and-paper platform with responses collected using an electronic platform. Data for a program evaluation study were collected using either the pen-and-paper platform, an iPad, or an iPad Mini at a series of after-hours events for adults at the Center of Science and Industry, a Midwest science center. Metrics were designed to calculate a comprehensive response score consisting of the breadth of information and the richness of detail in open-ended item responses, allowing us to compare the overall response quality between the three platforms. Results indicate that qualitative data collected using electronic devices are as broad and detailed as data collected using traditional pen-and-paper techniques.","PeriodicalId":45516,"journal":{"name":"Visitor Studies","volume":"21 1","pages":"121 - 134"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10645578.2018.1503877","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Platform Used for Data Collection on Open-Ended Response Quality\",\"authors\":\"E. E. T. Horr, J. Heimlich\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10645578.2018.1503877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Although the validity of collecting quantitative data using electronic platforms has been widely accepted, there has been concern that qualitative data collected on an electronic platform may not provide the same depth and richness in response quality as data collected using the pen-and-paper format. This article compares the quality of responses to open-ended questions collected using the pen-and-paper platform with responses collected using an electronic platform. Data for a program evaluation study were collected using either the pen-and-paper platform, an iPad, or an iPad Mini at a series of after-hours events for adults at the Center of Science and Industry, a Midwest science center. Metrics were designed to calculate a comprehensive response score consisting of the breadth of information and the richness of detail in open-ended item responses, allowing us to compare the overall response quality between the three platforms. Results indicate that qualitative data collected using electronic devices are as broad and detailed as data collected using traditional pen-and-paper techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visitor Studies\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"121 - 134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10645578.2018.1503877\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visitor Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2018.1503877\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visitor Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2018.1503877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要尽管使用电子平台收集定量数据的有效性已被广泛接受,但人们担心,在电子平台上收集的定性数据可能无法提供与使用纸笔格式收集的数据相同的深度和丰富的响应质量。本文比较了使用纸笔平台收集的开放式问题回答和使用电子平台收集的回答的质量。在中西部科学中心科学与工业中心为成年人举办的一系列下班后活动中,使用纸笔平台、iPad或iPad Mini收集了一项项目评估研究的数据。指标旨在计算由开放式项目回答中信息的广度和细节的丰富性组成的综合回答得分,使我们能够比较三个平台之间的总体回答质量。结果表明,使用电子设备收集的定性数据与使用传统纸笔技术收集的数据一样广泛和详细。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Platform Used for Data Collection on Open-Ended Response Quality
Abstract Although the validity of collecting quantitative data using electronic platforms has been widely accepted, there has been concern that qualitative data collected on an electronic platform may not provide the same depth and richness in response quality as data collected using the pen-and-paper format. This article compares the quality of responses to open-ended questions collected using the pen-and-paper platform with responses collected using an electronic platform. Data for a program evaluation study were collected using either the pen-and-paper platform, an iPad, or an iPad Mini at a series of after-hours events for adults at the Center of Science and Industry, a Midwest science center. Metrics were designed to calculate a comprehensive response score consisting of the breadth of information and the richness of detail in open-ended item responses, allowing us to compare the overall response quality between the three platforms. Results indicate that qualitative data collected using electronic devices are as broad and detailed as data collected using traditional pen-and-paper techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Visitor Studies
Visitor Studies HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
13.30%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信