罗斯之谜与智利宪法问题:另一种解读

Diego Pardo Álvarez
{"title":"罗斯之谜与智利宪法问题:另一种解读","authors":"Diego Pardo Álvarez","doi":"10.5354/0718-4735.2017.47962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolTomando como punto de partida el puzle constitucional de Alf Ross, Miriam Henriquez y George Lambeth defienden la validez de la modificacion de la potestad de reforma establecida en el capitulo XV de la Constitucion chilena. En el presente trabajo se critica la elaboracion de Henriquez y Lambeth, se introduce una aproximacion alternativa al puzle y se analizan ciertos aspectos del debate constitucional a la luz de tal interpretacion. EnglishTaking as a starting point Alf Ross’ constitutional puzzle, Miriam Henriquez and George Lambeth defend the validity of the modification of the amending power established in chapter XV of the Chilean Constitution. This paper critizes Henriquez’s and Lambeth’s elaboration, introduces an alternative approach to the puzzle and analyzes, in the light of such interpretation, certain aspects of the chilean constitutional debate","PeriodicalId":31642,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","volume":"1 1","pages":"81-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El puzle de Ross y el problema constitucional chileno: Una lectura alternativa\",\"authors\":\"Diego Pardo Álvarez\",\"doi\":\"10.5354/0718-4735.2017.47962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"espanolTomando como punto de partida el puzle constitucional de Alf Ross, Miriam Henriquez y George Lambeth defienden la validez de la modificacion de la potestad de reforma establecida en el capitulo XV de la Constitucion chilena. En el presente trabajo se critica la elaboracion de Henriquez y Lambeth, se introduce una aproximacion alternativa al puzle y se analizan ciertos aspectos del debate constitucional a la luz de tal interpretacion. EnglishTaking as a starting point Alf Ross’ constitutional puzzle, Miriam Henriquez and George Lambeth defend the validity of the modification of the amending power established in chapter XV of the Chilean Constitution. This paper critizes Henriquez’s and Lambeth’s elaboration, introduces an alternative approach to the puzzle and analyzes, in the light of such interpretation, certain aspects of the chilean constitutional debate\",\"PeriodicalId\":31642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"81-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5354/0718-4735.2017.47962\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0718-4735.2017.47962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

米里亚姆·恩里克斯和乔治·兰贝斯以阿尔夫·罗斯的宪法之谜为起点,捍卫了《智利宪法》第十五章规定的改革权力修正案的有效性。本文批评了恩里克斯和兰贝斯的阐述,介绍了一种替代拼图的方法,并根据这种解释分析了宪法辩论的某些方面。米里亚姆·恩里克斯和乔治·兰贝斯以阿尔夫·罗斯的宪法之谜为起点,为修改《智利宪法》第十五章规定的修正权的有效性辩护。本文批评了恩里克斯和兰贝斯的阐述,介绍了解决这一难题的另一种方法,并根据这种解释分析了智利宪法辩论的某些方面
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
El puzle de Ross y el problema constitucional chileno: Una lectura alternativa
espanolTomando como punto de partida el puzle constitucional de Alf Ross, Miriam Henriquez y George Lambeth defienden la validez de la modificacion de la potestad de reforma establecida en el capitulo XV de la Constitucion chilena. En el presente trabajo se critica la elaboracion de Henriquez y Lambeth, se introduce una aproximacion alternativa al puzle y se analizan ciertos aspectos del debate constitucional a la luz de tal interpretacion. EnglishTaking as a starting point Alf Ross’ constitutional puzzle, Miriam Henriquez and George Lambeth defend the validity of the modification of the amending power established in chapter XV of the Chilean Constitution. This paper critizes Henriquez’s and Lambeth’s elaboration, introduces an alternative approach to the puzzle and analyzes, in the light of such interpretation, certain aspects of the chilean constitutional debate
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信