感知压力量表:来自TCT和irt的心理测量分析

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Cecilia Reyna, Débora Jeanette Mola, Pablo Sebastián Correa
{"title":"感知压力量表:来自TCT和irt的心理测量分析","authors":"Cecilia Reyna,&nbsp;Débora Jeanette Mola,&nbsp;Pablo Sebastián Correa","doi":"10.1016/j.anyes.2019.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>The Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen et al., 1983) (PSS) is one of the scales most frequently used to measure stress. Its psychometric properties have been studied with samples from different countries, although there is no complete agreement on its dimensionality. In addition, few studies have used IRT. Taking into account the need to obtain evidence on the psychometric properties of the scale (extended and short version) in our context, we analyzed the structural validity and precision of the measurements from CTT and IRT in a sample of citizens from Córdoba, Argentina.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and method</h3><p>Participated 279 citizens (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->279, <em>M</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->36.61 years old, <em>SD</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->13.97). The Spanish version of the Perceived Stress Scales was used.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model of two correlated factors and the bifactor model showed adequate global adjustments in both versions of the PSS, although in the second one some items showed non-significant loads. The analysis of internal consistency showed adequate indexes in both versions. The results derived from the IRT indicate that the items of the two dimensions of the scale fit appropriately to a graduated response model, the estimated parameters show that the items estimate a wide range of values of the latent traits and that they discriminate between people with different levels of trait. In turn, high correlations between statistical derived from CTT and IRT were observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The evidence obtained makes the scale a useful and reliable instrument to be used in our context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45616,"journal":{"name":"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress","volume":"25 2","pages":"Pages 138-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Escala de Estrés Percibido: análisis psicométrico desde la TCT y la TRI\",\"authors\":\"Cecilia Reyna,&nbsp;Débora Jeanette Mola,&nbsp;Pablo Sebastián Correa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anyes.2019.04.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>The Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen et al., 1983) (PSS) is one of the scales most frequently used to measure stress. Its psychometric properties have been studied with samples from different countries, although there is no complete agreement on its dimensionality. In addition, few studies have used IRT. Taking into account the need to obtain evidence on the psychometric properties of the scale (extended and short version) in our context, we analyzed the structural validity and precision of the measurements from CTT and IRT in a sample of citizens from Córdoba, Argentina.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and method</h3><p>Participated 279 citizens (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->279, <em>M</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->36.61 years old, <em>SD</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->13.97). The Spanish version of the Perceived Stress Scales was used.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model of two correlated factors and the bifactor model showed adequate global adjustments in both versions of the PSS, although in the second one some items showed non-significant loads. The analysis of internal consistency showed adequate indexes in both versions. The results derived from the IRT indicate that the items of the two dimensions of the scale fit appropriately to a graduated response model, the estimated parameters show that the items estimate a wide range of values of the latent traits and that they discriminate between people with different levels of trait. In turn, high correlations between statistical derived from CTT and IRT were observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The evidence obtained makes the scale a useful and reliable instrument to be used in our context.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 138-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134793718301283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134793718301283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

引言和目标感知压力量表(Cohen et al., 1983) (PSS)是最常用来测量压力的量表之一。它的心理测量特性已经用来自不同国家的样本进行了研究,尽管在它的维度上还没有完全一致。此外,很少有研究使用IRT。考虑到需要在我们的背景下获得关于量表(扩展版和简短版)心理测量特性的证据,我们分析了来自阿根廷Córdoba的公民样本中CTT和IRT测量的结构有效性和精度。调查对象279人(n = 279, M = 36.61, SD = 13.97)。使用西班牙语版本的感知压力量表。结果验证性因子分析表明,两个版本的PSS中,两个相关因素模型和双因素模型均显示出充分的整体调整,而第二个版本的PSS中,一些项目显示出不显著的负荷。内部一致性分析表明,两个版本的指标都足够。IRT结果表明,量表的两个维度的项目与逐级反应模型拟合较好,估计的参数表明,这些项目对潜在特质的估计范围较广,并且它们对不同特质水平的人有区别。反过来,观察到从CTT和IRT得出的统计数据之间的高度相关性。结论所获得的证据表明,该量表是一种有用的、可靠的工具,可以在我们的背景下使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Escala de Estrés Percibido: análisis psicométrico desde la TCT y la TRI

Introduction and objectives

The Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen et al., 1983) (PSS) is one of the scales most frequently used to measure stress. Its psychometric properties have been studied with samples from different countries, although there is no complete agreement on its dimensionality. In addition, few studies have used IRT. Taking into account the need to obtain evidence on the psychometric properties of the scale (extended and short version) in our context, we analyzed the structural validity and precision of the measurements from CTT and IRT in a sample of citizens from Córdoba, Argentina.

Materials and method

Participated 279 citizens (n = 279, M = 36.61 years old, SD = 13.97). The Spanish version of the Perceived Stress Scales was used.

Results

Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model of two correlated factors and the bifactor model showed adequate global adjustments in both versions of the PSS, although in the second one some items showed non-significant loads. The analysis of internal consistency showed adequate indexes in both versions. The results derived from the IRT indicate that the items of the two dimensions of the scale fit appropriately to a graduated response model, the estimated parameters show that the items estimate a wide range of values of the latent traits and that they discriminate between people with different levels of trait. In turn, high correlations between statistical derived from CTT and IRT were observed.

Conclusions

The evidence obtained makes the scale a useful and reliable instrument to be used in our context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress
Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信