新的开始,重复:对教育领导力的持续探索

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
I. Bogotch, Scott C. Bauer, Eleanor Su-Keene
{"title":"新的开始,重复:对教育领导力的持续探索","authors":"I. Bogotch, Scott C. Bauer, Eleanor Su-Keene","doi":"10.30828/REAL/2019.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this scholarly essay is to offer a number of logics of academic arguments as follows:  leadership as contested/seductive theories, leadership as an organizing activity, and leadership as praxis. Each academic argument presents its own theoretical, communicative and practical challenges, often necessitating a beginning again in search of leadership’s ontological status; that is, in what sense is leadership real?  Methodologically, the authors rely on asking pragmatic and constructivist questions (i.e. what difference does it make?) regarding problematic relationships among diverse researchers and between themselves and practitioners. With some amount of courage and a great deal of ignorance, the authors jump into the rabbit hole of relational sociology, leaving answers as next steps to the wisdom of our readers","PeriodicalId":41311,"journal":{"name":"Research in Educational Administration & Leadership","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Beginnings, Repeated: The Continuing Search for Educational Leadership\",\"authors\":\"I. Bogotch, Scott C. Bauer, Eleanor Su-Keene\",\"doi\":\"10.30828/REAL/2019.1.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this scholarly essay is to offer a number of logics of academic arguments as follows:  leadership as contested/seductive theories, leadership as an organizing activity, and leadership as praxis. Each academic argument presents its own theoretical, communicative and practical challenges, often necessitating a beginning again in search of leadership’s ontological status; that is, in what sense is leadership real?  Methodologically, the authors rely on asking pragmatic and constructivist questions (i.e. what difference does it make?) regarding problematic relationships among diverse researchers and between themselves and practitioners. With some amount of courage and a great deal of ignorance, the authors jump into the rabbit hole of relational sociology, leaving answers as next steps to the wisdom of our readers\",\"PeriodicalId\":41311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Educational Administration & Leadership\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Educational Administration & Leadership\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30828/REAL/2019.1.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Educational Administration & Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30828/REAL/2019.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇学术论文的目的是提供一些学术论点的逻辑如下:领导力作为有争议的/诱人的理论,领导力作为一种组织活动,领导力作为实践。每个学术论点都提出了自己的理论、交流和实践挑战,往往需要重新开始寻找领导力的本体论地位;也就是说,领导力在什么意义上是真实的?在方法上,作者依赖于提出实用主义和建构主义的问题(即,它有什么不同?)关于不同研究人员之间以及他们自己和从业者之间的问题关系。带着一定的勇气和大量的无知,作者跳进关系社会学的兔子洞,留下答案作为下一步的智慧留给我们的读者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New Beginnings, Repeated: The Continuing Search for Educational Leadership
The purpose of this scholarly essay is to offer a number of logics of academic arguments as follows:  leadership as contested/seductive theories, leadership as an organizing activity, and leadership as praxis. Each academic argument presents its own theoretical, communicative and practical challenges, often necessitating a beginning again in search of leadership’s ontological status; that is, in what sense is leadership real?  Methodologically, the authors rely on asking pragmatic and constructivist questions (i.e. what difference does it make?) regarding problematic relationships among diverse researchers and between themselves and practitioners. With some amount of courage and a great deal of ignorance, the authors jump into the rabbit hole of relational sociology, leaving answers as next steps to the wisdom of our readers
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Educational Administration & Leadership
Research in Educational Administration & Leadership EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信