时间的流逝不是幻觉：它是投影

IF 0.8 2区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2023-09-05 DOI:10.1017/S0031819123000207

Adrian Bardon

{"title":"时间的流逝不是幻觉：它是投影","authors":"Adrian Bardon","doi":"10.1017/S0031819123000207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This essay aims to review and clarify an emerging consensus among philosophers of time: that belief in the passage of time is not a matter of illusion but rather the result of a variety of cognitive error. I argue that this error is best described in terms of psychological projection, properly understood. A close analysis of varieties of projection reveals how well this phenomenon accounts for belief in dynamic temporal passage and the objective becoming of events. A projectivist account of belief in the passage of time is, in actuality, already predominant in contemporary philosophy of time; but the language of illusion still used by many theorists is hampering recognition of the nature of the solution as well as the recent progress towards consensus.","PeriodicalId":54197,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY","volume":"98 1","pages":"485 - 506"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Passage of Time is Not an Illusion: It's a Projection\",\"authors\":\"Adrian Bardon\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0031819123000207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This essay aims to review and clarify an emerging consensus among philosophers of time: that belief in the passage of time is not a matter of illusion but rather the result of a variety of cognitive error. I argue that this error is best described in terms of psychological projection, properly understood. A close analysis of varieties of projection reveals how well this phenomenon accounts for belief in dynamic temporal passage and the objective becoming of events. A projectivist account of belief in the passage of time is, in actuality, already predominant in contemporary philosophy of time; but the language of illusion still used by many theorists is hampering recognition of the nature of the solution as well as the recent progress towards consensus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"485 - 506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819123000207\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819123000207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文旨在回顾和澄清时间哲学家之间正在形成的共识：对时间流逝的信念不是幻觉，而是各种认知错误的结果。我认为，这种错误最好用心理投射的方式来描述，并得到正确的理解。对各种投影的仔细分析揭示了这种现象在多大程度上解释了对动态时间流逝和事件客观化的信念。事实上，在当代时间哲学中，对时间流逝信念的投射主义描述已经占主导地位；但许多理论家仍在使用幻觉的语言，这阻碍了人们对解决方案本质的认识，以及最近达成共识的进展。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Passage of Time is Not an Illusion: It's a Projection

Abstract This essay aims to review and clarify an emerging consensus among philosophers of time: that belief in the passage of time is not a matter of illusion but rather the result of a variety of cognitive error. I argue that this error is best described in terms of psychological projection, properly understood. A close analysis of varieties of projection reveals how well this phenomenon accounts for belief in dynamic temporal passage and the objective becoming of events. A projectivist account of belief in the passage of time is, in actuality, already predominant in contemporary philosophy of time; but the language of illusion still used by many theorists is hampering recognition of the nature of the solution as well as the recent progress towards consensus.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Philosophy is the journal of the Royal Institute of Philosophy, which was founded in 1925 to build bridges between specialist philosophers and a wider educated public. The journal continues to fulfil a dual role: it is one of the leading academic journals of philosophy, but it also serves the philosophical interests of specialists in other fields (law, language, literature and the arts, medicine, politics, religion, science, education, psychology, history) and those of the informed general reader. Contributors are required to avoid needless technicality of language and presentation. The institutional subscription includes two supplements.