老年患者左耳关闭与ACOD:按倾向评分配对的分析

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Berenice Caneiro-Queija, Rodrigo Estévez-Loureiro, Sergio Raposeiras-Roubín, Emad Abu-Assi, Rocío González-Ferreiro, I. Cruz-González, Alejandro Diego-Nieto, Antonio A. de Miguel-Castro, Guillermo Bastos-Fernández, J. A. Baz-Alonso, Guilles O’Hara, Josep Rodés-Cabau y, Andrés Íñiguez-Romo
{"title":"老年患者左耳关闭与ACOD:按倾向评分配对的分析","authors":"Berenice Caneiro-Queija, Rodrigo Estévez-Loureiro, Sergio Raposeiras-Roubín, Emad Abu-Assi, Rocío González-Ferreiro, I. Cruz-González, Alejandro Diego-Nieto, Antonio A. de Miguel-Castro, Guillermo Bastos-Fernández, J. A. Baz-Alonso, Guilles O’Hara, Josep Rodés-Cabau y, Andrés Íñiguez-Romo","doi":"10.24875/recic.m22000316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and objectives: Information comparing left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) to direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) therapy is scarce. Our aim is to compare the clinical outcomes between LAAC and DOACs on an elderly population (> 80 years of age). Methods: We retrospectively collected 1144 octogenarian patients with atrial fibrillation from 3 different tertiary hospitals. A total of 970 patients received DOACs and 174 patients were treated with LAAC. At baseline, both groups had similar cardiovascular risk factors. The LAAC group had more history of bleeding, anemia or previous cancer. We conducted a propensity score matching study and obtained 2 different paired groups of 58 patients with similar baseline risk factors, comorbidities, and risk scores who received DOACs or were treated with LAAC. The outcomes of the therapeutic strategy used (DOACs or LAAC) were assessed using the Cox regression analysis. ARTICLE IN PRESS Cómo citar este artículo: Caneiro-Queija B, et al. Cierre de orejuela izquierda frente a ACOD en pacientes mayores: análisis con emparejamiento por puntuación de propensión. REC Interv Cardiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.24875/RECIC.M22000316 2 B. Caneiro-Queija et al. REC Interv Cardiol. 20XX;XX(X):XX-XX","PeriodicalId":34295,"journal":{"name":"REC Interventional Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cierre de orejuela izquierda frente a ACOD en pacientes mayores: an�lisis con emparejamiento por puntuaci�n de propensi�n\",\"authors\":\"Berenice Caneiro-Queija, Rodrigo Estévez-Loureiro, Sergio Raposeiras-Roubín, Emad Abu-Assi, Rocío González-Ferreiro, I. Cruz-González, Alejandro Diego-Nieto, Antonio A. de Miguel-Castro, Guillermo Bastos-Fernández, J. A. Baz-Alonso, Guilles O’Hara, Josep Rodés-Cabau y, Andrés Íñiguez-Romo\",\"doi\":\"10.24875/recic.m22000316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction and objectives: Information comparing left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) to direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) therapy is scarce. Our aim is to compare the clinical outcomes between LAAC and DOACs on an elderly population (> 80 years of age). Methods: We retrospectively collected 1144 octogenarian patients with atrial fibrillation from 3 different tertiary hospitals. A total of 970 patients received DOACs and 174 patients were treated with LAAC. At baseline, both groups had similar cardiovascular risk factors. The LAAC group had more history of bleeding, anemia or previous cancer. We conducted a propensity score matching study and obtained 2 different paired groups of 58 patients with similar baseline risk factors, comorbidities, and risk scores who received DOACs or were treated with LAAC. The outcomes of the therapeutic strategy used (DOACs or LAAC) were assessed using the Cox regression analysis. ARTICLE IN PRESS Cómo citar este artículo: Caneiro-Queija B, et al. Cierre de orejuela izquierda frente a ACOD en pacientes mayores: análisis con emparejamiento por puntuación de propensión. REC Interv Cardiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.24875/RECIC.M22000316 2 B. Caneiro-Queija et al. REC Interv Cardiol. 20XX;XX(X):XX-XX\",\"PeriodicalId\":34295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REC Interventional Cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REC Interventional Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24875/recic.m22000316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REC Interventional Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/recic.m22000316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言和目的:比较左心耳封堵术(LAAC)和直接口服抗凝治疗(DOAC)的信息很少。我们的目的是比较LAAC和DOAC在老年人群(>80岁)中的临床结果。方法:我们回顾性地收集了来自3家不同的三级医院的1144名八旬心房颤动患者。共有970名患者接受DOAC治疗,174名患者接受LAAC治疗。在基线时,两组的心血管危险因素相似。LAAC组有更多出血、贫血或既往癌症病史。我们进行了一项倾向评分匹配研究,获得了两组不同的配对患者,每组58名,基线风险因素、合并症和风险评分相似,接受DOAC或接受LAAC治疗的患者。使用Cox回归分析评估所用治疗策略(DOAC或LAAC)的结果。新闻中心的文章:Caneiro Queija B等人。REC介入心脏病学。2022https://doi.org/10.24875/RECIC.M220003162 B.Caneiro Queija等人REC Interv Cardiol。20XX;XX(X):XX-XX
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cierre de orejuela izquierda frente a ACOD en pacientes mayores: an�lisis con emparejamiento por puntuaci�n de propensi�n
Introduction and objectives: Information comparing left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) to direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) therapy is scarce. Our aim is to compare the clinical outcomes between LAAC and DOACs on an elderly population (> 80 years of age). Methods: We retrospectively collected 1144 octogenarian patients with atrial fibrillation from 3 different tertiary hospitals. A total of 970 patients received DOACs and 174 patients were treated with LAAC. At baseline, both groups had similar cardiovascular risk factors. The LAAC group had more history of bleeding, anemia or previous cancer. We conducted a propensity score matching study and obtained 2 different paired groups of 58 patients with similar baseline risk factors, comorbidities, and risk scores who received DOACs or were treated with LAAC. The outcomes of the therapeutic strategy used (DOACs or LAAC) were assessed using the Cox regression analysis. ARTICLE IN PRESS Cómo citar este artículo: Caneiro-Queija B, et al. Cierre de orejuela izquierda frente a ACOD en pacientes mayores: análisis con emparejamiento por puntuación de propensión. REC Interv Cardiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.24875/RECIC.M22000316 2 B. Caneiro-Queija et al. REC Interv Cardiol. 20XX;XX(X):XX-XX
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
REC Interventional Cardiology
REC Interventional Cardiology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
28.60%
发文量
87
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信