什么保护联邦统计机构的自主权？对保护美国官方统计数据独立性和客观性的现行程序的评估

IF 1.5 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS

Statistics and Public Policy Pub Date : 2023-03-10 DOI:10.1080/2330443x.2023.2188062

C. Citro, Jonathan Auerbach, Katherine Smith Evans, E. Groshen, J. Landefeld, J. Mulrow, Tom Petska, Steve Pierson, N. Potok, C. Rothwell, John Thompson, James L. Woodworth, Edward Wu

{"title":"什么保护联邦统计机构的自主权？对保护美国官方统计数据独立性和客观性的现行程序的评估","authors":"C. Citro, Jonathan Auerbach, Katherine Smith Evans, E. Groshen, J. Landefeld, J. Mulrow, Tom Petska, Steve Pierson, N. Potok, C. Rothwell, John Thompson, James L. Woodworth, Edward Wu","doi":"10.1080/2330443x.2023.2188062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Abstract We assess the professional autonomy of the 13 principal U.S. federal statistical agencies. We define six components or measures of such autonomy and evaluate each of the 13 principal statistical agencies according to each measure. Our assessment yields three main findings: 1. Challenges to the objectivity, credibility, and utility of federal statistics arise largely as a consequence of insufficient autonomy. 2. There is remarkable variation in autonomy protections and a surprising lack of statutory protections for many agencies for many of the proposed measures. 3. Many existing autonomy rules and guidelines are weakened by unclear or unactionable","PeriodicalId":43397,"journal":{"name":"Statistics and Public Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Protects the Autonomy of the Federal Statistical Agencies? An Assessment of the Procedures in Place to Protect the Independence and Objectivity of Official U.S. Statistics\",\"authors\":\"C. Citro, Jonathan Auerbach, Katherine Smith Evans, E. Groshen, J. Landefeld, J. Mulrow, Tom Petska, Steve Pierson, N. Potok, C. Rothwell, John Thompson, James L. Woodworth, Edward Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2330443x.2023.2188062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Abstract We assess the professional autonomy of the 13 principal U.S. federal statistical agencies. We define six components or measures of such autonomy and evaluate each of the 13 principal statistical agencies according to each measure. Our assessment yields three main findings: 1. Challenges to the objectivity, credibility, and utility of federal statistics arise largely as a consequence of insufficient autonomy. 2. There is remarkable variation in autonomy protections and a surprising lack of statutory protections for many agencies for many of the proposed measures. 3. Many existing autonomy rules and guidelines are weakened by unclear or unactionable\",\"PeriodicalId\":43397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistics and Public Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistics and Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2330443x.2023.2188062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2330443x.2023.2188062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要我们评估了美国13个主要联邦统计机构的专业自主权。我们定义了这种自主权的六个组成部分或衡量标准，并根据每个衡量标准对13个主要统计机构中的每一个进行评估。我们的评估得出了三个主要结论：1。联邦统计数据的客观性、可信度和实用性面临挑战，主要是由于自主权不足。2.在自治保护方面存在显著差异，许多拟议措施中许多机构缺乏法定保护，这令人惊讶。3.许多现有的自治规则和指导方针因不明确或无法实施而被削弱

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

What Protects the Autonomy of the Federal Statistical Agencies? An Assessment of the Procedures in Place to Protect the Independence and Objectivity of Official U.S. Statistics

The Abstract We assess the professional autonomy of the 13 principal U.S. federal statistical agencies. We define six components or measures of such autonomy and evaluate each of the 13 principal statistical agencies according to each measure. Our assessment yields three main findings: 1. Challenges to the objectivity, credibility, and utility of federal statistics arise largely as a consequence of insufficient autonomy. 2. There is remarkable variation in autonomy protections and a surprising lack of statutory protections for many agencies for many of the proposed measures. 3. Many existing autonomy rules and guidelines are weakened by unclear or unactionable

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Statistics and Public Policy SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS-

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

6.20%

发文量

审稿时长

32 weeks