异丙硫醇在大米洗涤和蒸煮过程中的还原作用

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Myung-Huk Kim, Mihyun Cho, Soboleva An, M. Im
{"title":"异丙硫醇在大米洗涤和蒸煮过程中的还原作用","authors":"Myung-Huk Kim, Mihyun Cho, Soboleva An, M. Im","doi":"10.11002/kjfp.2022.30.3.472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n This study used gas chromatography combined with the microelectron capture\n detection method to determine the most effective washing and cooking methods for\n removing isoprothiolane from rice. The initial isoprothiolane concentrations in\n brown and polished rice, before washing, were 17.03 mg/kg and 1.67 mg/kg,\n respectively. Residual concentrations declined with more washing cycles\n (19.3-59.3% for brown rice; 43.1-66.5% for polished rice); and by\n increasing the temperature of the washing water from 5°C to 40°C\n (56.6-63.1% for brown rice; 67.1-74.9% for polished rice).\n Hand-washing samples using gentle stirring or harsh rubbing reduced pesticide\n concentrations by 63.1-71.6% for brown rice, versus 75.4-87.4% for\n polished rice. Reduction in isoprothiolane concentrations varied based on the\n rice cooker type and whether the rice was pre-soaked. Immediate cooking using an\n electric- or pressure-cooker showed 78.5% and 78.4%\n reduction in brown rice, compared with 94.0% and 94.0% for\n polished rice, respectively. Pre-cooking immersion for 30 min showed similar\n reductions of 83.4% and 83.4% in brown rice, versus 95.8%\n and 95.8% in polished rice. The results of this study suggest that the\n most effective method for removing residual isoprothiolane from both brown rice\n and polished rice was to wash six times (with vigorous rubbing during the 2nd\n and 3rd washing) in 7-fold water at 40°C, followed by immersion for 30\n min before cooking. Regardless of the type of rice cooker, heating is sufficient\n to remove an average of 83.4% and 95.8% of isoprothiolane from\n brown rice and polished rice, respectively.\n","PeriodicalId":17875,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Food Preservation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduction effects of isoprothiolane during rice washing and\\n cooking\",\"authors\":\"Myung-Huk Kim, Mihyun Cho, Soboleva An, M. Im\",\"doi\":\"10.11002/kjfp.2022.30.3.472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n This study used gas chromatography combined with the microelectron capture\\n detection method to determine the most effective washing and cooking methods for\\n removing isoprothiolane from rice. The initial isoprothiolane concentrations in\\n brown and polished rice, before washing, were 17.03 mg/kg and 1.67 mg/kg,\\n respectively. Residual concentrations declined with more washing cycles\\n (19.3-59.3% for brown rice; 43.1-66.5% for polished rice); and by\\n increasing the temperature of the washing water from 5°C to 40°C\\n (56.6-63.1% for brown rice; 67.1-74.9% for polished rice).\\n Hand-washing samples using gentle stirring or harsh rubbing reduced pesticide\\n concentrations by 63.1-71.6% for brown rice, versus 75.4-87.4% for\\n polished rice. Reduction in isoprothiolane concentrations varied based on the\\n rice cooker type and whether the rice was pre-soaked. Immediate cooking using an\\n electric- or pressure-cooker showed 78.5% and 78.4%\\n reduction in brown rice, compared with 94.0% and 94.0% for\\n polished rice, respectively. Pre-cooking immersion for 30 min showed similar\\n reductions of 83.4% and 83.4% in brown rice, versus 95.8%\\n and 95.8% in polished rice. The results of this study suggest that the\\n most effective method for removing residual isoprothiolane from both brown rice\\n and polished rice was to wash six times (with vigorous rubbing during the 2nd\\n and 3rd washing) in 7-fold water at 40°C, followed by immersion for 30\\n min before cooking. Regardless of the type of rice cooker, heating is sufficient\\n to remove an average of 83.4% and 95.8% of isoprothiolane from\\n brown rice and polished rice, respectively.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":17875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Food Preservation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Food Preservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2022.30.3.472\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Food Preservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2022.30.3.472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用气相色谱法和微机电捕获检测法相结合的方法,确定了去除大米中异丙硫醇的最有效的洗涤和烹饪方法。糙米和精米在洗涤前的初始异硫平浓度分别为17.03 mg/kg和1.67 mg/kg。残留浓度随着洗涤周期的增加而下降(糙米为19.3-59.3%;精米为43.1-66.5%);并通过将洗涤水的温度从5°C提高到40°C(糙米为56.6-63.1%;精米为67.1-74.9%)。使用温和搅拌或剧烈摩擦的洗手样本使糙米的农药浓度降低了63.1-71.6%,而精米的农药浓度为75.4-87.4%。异丙胺浓度的降低因电饭煲类型和大米是否预浸泡而异。使用电饭锅或高压锅立即烹饪,糙米的含量分别减少了78.5%和78.4%,而精米的含量分别为94.0%和94.0%。预煮浸泡30分钟后,糙米的降幅相似,分别为83.4%和83.4%,而精米的降幅分别为95.8%和95.8%。这项研究的结果表明,从糙米和糙米中去除残留异丙硫醇的最有效方法是在40°C的7倍水中洗涤6次(在第二次和第三次洗涤过程中用力摩擦),然后在烹饪前浸泡30分钟。无论电饭煲的类型如何,加热都足以分别从糙米和精米中平均去除83.4%和95.8%的异丙环丁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reduction effects of isoprothiolane during rice washing and cooking
This study used gas chromatography combined with the microelectron capture detection method to determine the most effective washing and cooking methods for removing isoprothiolane from rice. The initial isoprothiolane concentrations in brown and polished rice, before washing, were 17.03 mg/kg and 1.67 mg/kg, respectively. Residual concentrations declined with more washing cycles (19.3-59.3% for brown rice; 43.1-66.5% for polished rice); and by increasing the temperature of the washing water from 5°C to 40°C (56.6-63.1% for brown rice; 67.1-74.9% for polished rice). Hand-washing samples using gentle stirring or harsh rubbing reduced pesticide concentrations by 63.1-71.6% for brown rice, versus 75.4-87.4% for polished rice. Reduction in isoprothiolane concentrations varied based on the rice cooker type and whether the rice was pre-soaked. Immediate cooking using an electric- or pressure-cooker showed 78.5% and 78.4% reduction in brown rice, compared with 94.0% and 94.0% for polished rice, respectively. Pre-cooking immersion for 30 min showed similar reductions of 83.4% and 83.4% in brown rice, versus 95.8% and 95.8% in polished rice. The results of this study suggest that the most effective method for removing residual isoprothiolane from both brown rice and polished rice was to wash six times (with vigorous rubbing during the 2nd and 3rd washing) in 7-fold water at 40°C, followed by immersion for 30 min before cooking. Regardless of the type of rice cooker, heating is sufficient to remove an average of 83.4% and 95.8% of isoprothiolane from brown rice and polished rice, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Food Preservation
Korean Journal of Food Preservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: This journal aims to promote and encourage the advancement of quantitative improvement for the storage, processing and distribution of food and its related disciplines, theory and research on its application. Topics covered include: Food Preservation and Packaging Food and Food Material distribution Fresh-cut Food Manufacturing Food processing Technology Food Functional Properties Food Quality / Safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信