不同生态型的地下三叶草(Trifolium subterraneum ssp.yanninicum)是一种耐涝的一年生牧草,对淹水后缺水的反应各不相同

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Gereltsetseg Enkhbat, Yoshiaki Inukai, Phillip G. H. Nichols, Jiayin Pang, William Erskine, Kevin J. Foster, Megan H. Ryan
{"title":"不同生态型的地下三叶草(Trifolium subterraneum ssp.yanninicum)是一种耐涝的一年生牧草,对淹水后缺水的反应各不相同","authors":"Gereltsetseg Enkhbat,&nbsp;Yoshiaki Inukai,&nbsp;Phillip G. H. Nichols,&nbsp;Jiayin Pang,&nbsp;William Erskine,&nbsp;Kevin J. Foster,&nbsp;Megan H. Ryan","doi":"10.1111/aab.12856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The pasture legume <i>Trifolium subterraneum</i> ssp. <i>yanninicum</i> L. is waterlogging tolerant, but water-deficit (WD) susceptible. The interactive effect of waterlogged (WL) and WD (soil moisture fluctuation [SMF]) results in a severe stress impact. We studied three diverse ecotypes to identify traits associated with adaptation to SMF. Ecotypes were established in a glasshouse with two treatments imposed at 21 days: well-watered (WW–WW; 80% field capacity [FC]) and WL to WD (WL–WD). For WL–WD, pots were WL for 28 days (Harvest I), and then transitioned to WD (drained to 40% FC) and maintained for 10 days (Harvest II). For shoot relative growth rates (RGR) at Harvest I, WL had relatively little impact, although there was a greater reduction for Ecotype A (80% of WW) than Ecotypes B (92%) and C (87%). However, between Harvests I and II, the impact of WL–WD varied among ecotypes with Ecotype A being less affected (75% of WW–WW) than Ecotypes B (57%) and C (63%). For root RGR at Harvest I, WL resulted in a greater reduction for Ecotype A (52% of WW) than Ecotypes B (77%) and C (74%), while for WL–WD between Harvests I and II, Ecotype A showed a large increase (117% of WW–WW) compared to Ecotypes B (95%) and C (87%). In conclusion, the response to WD following WL varied among ecotypes, which demonstrates contrasting adaptation responses to SMF unrelated to WL tolerance. High yield under WL together with capacity for rapid growth post-WL in a drying soil profile could enhance adaptation to SMF.</p>","PeriodicalId":7977,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Applied Biology","volume":"183 3","pages":"287-301"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aab.12856","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to water-deficit following waterlogging varies among ecotypes of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum ssp. yanninicum), a waterlogging-tolerant annual pasture legume\",\"authors\":\"Gereltsetseg Enkhbat,&nbsp;Yoshiaki Inukai,&nbsp;Phillip G. H. Nichols,&nbsp;Jiayin Pang,&nbsp;William Erskine,&nbsp;Kevin J. Foster,&nbsp;Megan H. Ryan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aab.12856\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The pasture legume <i>Trifolium subterraneum</i> ssp. <i>yanninicum</i> L. is waterlogging tolerant, but water-deficit (WD) susceptible. The interactive effect of waterlogged (WL) and WD (soil moisture fluctuation [SMF]) results in a severe stress impact. We studied three diverse ecotypes to identify traits associated with adaptation to SMF. Ecotypes were established in a glasshouse with two treatments imposed at 21 days: well-watered (WW–WW; 80% field capacity [FC]) and WL to WD (WL–WD). For WL–WD, pots were WL for 28 days (Harvest I), and then transitioned to WD (drained to 40% FC) and maintained for 10 days (Harvest II). For shoot relative growth rates (RGR) at Harvest I, WL had relatively little impact, although there was a greater reduction for Ecotype A (80% of WW) than Ecotypes B (92%) and C (87%). However, between Harvests I and II, the impact of WL–WD varied among ecotypes with Ecotype A being less affected (75% of WW–WW) than Ecotypes B (57%) and C (63%). For root RGR at Harvest I, WL resulted in a greater reduction for Ecotype A (52% of WW) than Ecotypes B (77%) and C (74%), while for WL–WD between Harvests I and II, Ecotype A showed a large increase (117% of WW–WW) compared to Ecotypes B (95%) and C (87%). In conclusion, the response to WD following WL varied among ecotypes, which demonstrates contrasting adaptation responses to SMF unrelated to WL tolerance. High yield under WL together with capacity for rapid growth post-WL in a drying soil profile could enhance adaptation to SMF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Applied Biology\",\"volume\":\"183 3\",\"pages\":\"287-301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aab.12856\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Applied Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aab.12856\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Applied Biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aab.12856","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牧草三叶草。杨柳耐涝,但对水分亏缺敏感。淹水(WL)和WD(土壤水分波动[SMF])的相互作用导致了严重的应力影响。我们研究了三种不同的生态型,以确定与SMF适应相关的性状。在温室中建立了生态型,在21岁时进行了两次处理 天数:充分浇水(WW–WW;80%田间容量[FC])和WL至WD(WL–WD)。对于WL–WD,花盆为WL 28 天(收获I),然后过渡到WD(排水至40%FC)并保持10天 天(收获II)。对于Harvest I的地上部相对生长率(RGR),WL的影响相对较小,尽管生态型a(WW的80%)的降低幅度大于生态型B(92%)和C(87%)。然而,在收获I和II之间,WL–WD的影响在不同生态型之间有所不同,其中生态型A的影响(WW–WW的75%)小于生态型B(57%)和C(63%)。就收获期I的根RGR而言,WL导致生态型a(WW的52%)比生态型B(77%)和C(74%)减少得更多,而对于收获期I和II之间的WL–WD,生态型a与生态型B和C(95%)相比大幅增加(WW–WW的117%)。总之,不同生态型对WL后WD的反应各不相同,这表明对SMF的适应反应与WL耐受无关。在干旱土壤剖面中,WL下的高产以及WL后的快速生长能力可以增强对SMF的适应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Response to water-deficit following waterlogging varies among ecotypes of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum ssp. yanninicum), a waterlogging-tolerant annual pasture legume

Response to water-deficit following waterlogging varies among ecotypes of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum ssp. yanninicum), a waterlogging-tolerant annual pasture legume

The pasture legume Trifolium subterraneum ssp. yanninicum L. is waterlogging tolerant, but water-deficit (WD) susceptible. The interactive effect of waterlogged (WL) and WD (soil moisture fluctuation [SMF]) results in a severe stress impact. We studied three diverse ecotypes to identify traits associated with adaptation to SMF. Ecotypes were established in a glasshouse with two treatments imposed at 21 days: well-watered (WW–WW; 80% field capacity [FC]) and WL to WD (WL–WD). For WL–WD, pots were WL for 28 days (Harvest I), and then transitioned to WD (drained to 40% FC) and maintained for 10 days (Harvest II). For shoot relative growth rates (RGR) at Harvest I, WL had relatively little impact, although there was a greater reduction for Ecotype A (80% of WW) than Ecotypes B (92%) and C (87%). However, between Harvests I and II, the impact of WL–WD varied among ecotypes with Ecotype A being less affected (75% of WW–WW) than Ecotypes B (57%) and C (63%). For root RGR at Harvest I, WL resulted in a greater reduction for Ecotype A (52% of WW) than Ecotypes B (77%) and C (74%), while for WL–WD between Harvests I and II, Ecotype A showed a large increase (117% of WW–WW) compared to Ecotypes B (95%) and C (87%). In conclusion, the response to WD following WL varied among ecotypes, which demonstrates contrasting adaptation responses to SMF unrelated to WL tolerance. High yield under WL together with capacity for rapid growth post-WL in a drying soil profile could enhance adaptation to SMF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Applied Biology
Annals of Applied Biology 生物-农业综合
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Applied Biology is an international journal sponsored by the Association of Applied Biologists. The journal publishes original research papers on all aspects of applied research on crop production, crop protection and the cropping ecosystem. The journal is published both online and in six printed issues per year. Annals papers must contribute substantially to the advancement of knowledge and may, among others, encompass the scientific disciplines of: Agronomy Agrometeorology Agrienvironmental sciences Applied genomics Applied metabolomics Applied proteomics Biodiversity Biological control Climate change Crop ecology Entomology Genetic manipulation Molecular biology Mycology Nematology Pests Plant pathology Plant breeding & genetics Plant physiology Post harvest biology Soil science Statistics Virology Weed biology Annals also welcomes reviews of interest in these subject areas. Reviews should be critical surveys of the field and offer new insights. All papers are subject to peer review. Papers must usually contribute substantially to the advancement of knowledge in applied biology but short papers discussing techniques or substantiated results, and reviews of current knowledge of interest to applied biologists will be considered for publication. Papers or reviews must not be offered to any other journal for prior or simultaneous publication and normally average seven printed pages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信