合作的民族志:在联合研究中导航权力关系

O. Aijazi, Emily Amburgey, Bina Limbu, M. Suji, James Binks, Courtney Balaz-Munn, K. Rankin, S. Shneiderman
{"title":"合作的民族志:在联合研究中导航权力关系","authors":"O. Aijazi, Emily Amburgey, Bina Limbu, M. Suji, James Binks, Courtney Balaz-Munn, K. Rankin, S. Shneiderman","doi":"10.1353/cla.2021.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:We came together to write a paper on the devaluation of field researcher labor as an entry point into the broader domain of research ethics to unpack what collaboration may mean in settings of incommensurable inequality. These motivations were grounded in the materialities of our involvement within an international research project focused on post-earthquake reconstruction processes in Nepal since 2015. However, since we started writing this piece, some of us felt that the paper did not adequately reflect their experiences, others felt it put them in the hot seat too quickly, and some thought that it mimicked the faulty modes of collaboration we wanted to unsettle in the first place. Realizing the power dynamics within our own writing collective, we stepped away from a centralized narrative to make room for our diverse, sometimes complementary, sometimes contradictory experiences. The paper is a bricolage of reflections that focus on issues such as the division of labor, coauthorship, and community engagement. We use these reflections as a way to think critically about the current juncture of transnational, collaborative research and propose a series of open-ended reflections that prompt the problematization of the inequities, tensions, and emotional labor inherent in collaborative work.","PeriodicalId":88456,"journal":{"name":"Collaborative anthropologies","volume":"13 1","pages":"56 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/cla.2021.0003","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ethnography of Collaboration: Navigating Power Relationships in Joint Research\",\"authors\":\"O. Aijazi, Emily Amburgey, Bina Limbu, M. Suji, James Binks, Courtney Balaz-Munn, K. Rankin, S. Shneiderman\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cla.2021.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:We came together to write a paper on the devaluation of field researcher labor as an entry point into the broader domain of research ethics to unpack what collaboration may mean in settings of incommensurable inequality. These motivations were grounded in the materialities of our involvement within an international research project focused on post-earthquake reconstruction processes in Nepal since 2015. However, since we started writing this piece, some of us felt that the paper did not adequately reflect their experiences, others felt it put them in the hot seat too quickly, and some thought that it mimicked the faulty modes of collaboration we wanted to unsettle in the first place. Realizing the power dynamics within our own writing collective, we stepped away from a centralized narrative to make room for our diverse, sometimes complementary, sometimes contradictory experiences. The paper is a bricolage of reflections that focus on issues such as the division of labor, coauthorship, and community engagement. We use these reflections as a way to think critically about the current juncture of transnational, collaborative research and propose a series of open-ended reflections that prompt the problematization of the inequities, tensions, and emotional labor inherent in collaborative work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Collaborative anthropologies\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"56 - 99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/cla.2021.0003\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Collaborative anthropologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cla.2021.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collaborative anthropologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cla.2021.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要:我们共同撰写了一篇关于实地研究人员劳动贬值的论文,作为进入更广泛的研究伦理领域的切入点,以揭示在不可通约的不平等背景下合作可能意味着什么。这些动机是基于我们参与的一个国际研究项目的实质性内容,该项目专注于2015年以来尼泊尔地震后重建过程。然而,自从我们开始写这篇文章以来,我们中的一些人觉得这篇文章没有充分反映他们的经历,另一些人觉得这篇文章过快地把他们置于困境,还有一些人认为这篇文章模仿了我们一开始就想要动摇的错误的合作模式。意识到我们自己的写作集体的力量动态,我们离开了一个集中的叙述,为我们的多样化,有时互补,有时矛盾的经验腾出空间。这篇论文是对劳动分工、合著和社区参与等问题的反思的大杂烩。我们将这些反思作为一种批判性思考跨国合作研究的当前节点的方式,并提出一系列开放式反思,这些反思促进了协作工作中固有的不平等、紧张和情绪劳动的问题化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Ethnography of Collaboration: Navigating Power Relationships in Joint Research
Abstract:We came together to write a paper on the devaluation of field researcher labor as an entry point into the broader domain of research ethics to unpack what collaboration may mean in settings of incommensurable inequality. These motivations were grounded in the materialities of our involvement within an international research project focused on post-earthquake reconstruction processes in Nepal since 2015. However, since we started writing this piece, some of us felt that the paper did not adequately reflect their experiences, others felt it put them in the hot seat too quickly, and some thought that it mimicked the faulty modes of collaboration we wanted to unsettle in the first place. Realizing the power dynamics within our own writing collective, we stepped away from a centralized narrative to make room for our diverse, sometimes complementary, sometimes contradictory experiences. The paper is a bricolage of reflections that focus on issues such as the division of labor, coauthorship, and community engagement. We use these reflections as a way to think critically about the current juncture of transnational, collaborative research and propose a series of open-ended reflections that prompt the problematization of the inequities, tensions, and emotional labor inherent in collaborative work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信