公司治理结构、政治联系与税收优惠的转移定价

Kenny Ardillah, Yola Vanesa
{"title":"公司治理结构、政治联系与税收优惠的转移定价","authors":"Kenny Ardillah, Yola Vanesa","doi":"10.29259/sijdeb.v6i1.51-72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research examines and analyzes the effect of corporate governance structures, political connections, and transfer pricing on tax aggressiveness (CETR and BTD). The theory used in this research is agency theory. The sample of this research is manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for 2014-2018. The sampling method used in this research was purposive sampling and used multiple linear regression as the data analysis method. The results of the study using the cash effective tax rates (CETR) proxy show that the independent board has a positive effect on tax aggressiveness, the audit committee has a negative effect on tax aggressiveness, political connections do not affect tax aggressiveness, and transfer pricing does not affect tax aggressiveness. The result of research with a proxy book-tax difference (BTD) shows that independent commissioners do not influence tax aggressiveness, audit committees positively affect tax aggressiveness, political connections do not affect tax aggressiveness, and transfer pricing does not affect tax aggressiveness. The implication of this research reveals that the companies should follow tax regulations made by the government to do tax planning under applicable laws.","PeriodicalId":32395,"journal":{"name":"Sriwijaya International Journal of Dynamic Economics and Business","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate Governance Structure, Political Connections, and Transfer Pricing on Tax Aggressiveness\",\"authors\":\"Kenny Ardillah, Yola Vanesa\",\"doi\":\"10.29259/sijdeb.v6i1.51-72\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research examines and analyzes the effect of corporate governance structures, political connections, and transfer pricing on tax aggressiveness (CETR and BTD). The theory used in this research is agency theory. The sample of this research is manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for 2014-2018. The sampling method used in this research was purposive sampling and used multiple linear regression as the data analysis method. The results of the study using the cash effective tax rates (CETR) proxy show that the independent board has a positive effect on tax aggressiveness, the audit committee has a negative effect on tax aggressiveness, political connections do not affect tax aggressiveness, and transfer pricing does not affect tax aggressiveness. The result of research with a proxy book-tax difference (BTD) shows that independent commissioners do not influence tax aggressiveness, audit committees positively affect tax aggressiveness, political connections do not affect tax aggressiveness, and transfer pricing does not affect tax aggressiveness. The implication of this research reveals that the companies should follow tax regulations made by the government to do tax planning under applicable laws.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sriwijaya International Journal of Dynamic Economics and Business\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sriwijaya International Journal of Dynamic Economics and Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29259/sijdeb.v6i1.51-72\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sriwijaya International Journal of Dynamic Economics and Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29259/sijdeb.v6i1.51-72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察并分析了公司治理结构、政治关系和转让定价对税收侵略性的影响(ctr和BTD)。本研究使用的理论是代理理论。本研究的样本为2014-2018年在印尼证券交易所上市的制造业公司。本研究采用的抽样方法为目的抽样,采用多元线性回归作为数据分析方法。使用现金有效税率(CETR)代理的研究结果表明,独立董事会对税收侵略性有积极影响,审计委员会对税收侵略性有消极影响,政治关系不影响税收侵略性,转让定价不影响税收侵略性。具有代理帐税差异(BTD)的研究结果表明,独立专员不影响税收侵略性,审计委员会正向影响税收侵略性,政治关系不影响税收侵略性,转让定价不影响税收侵略性。本研究的启示是,企业应遵循政府制定的税收法规,在适用的法律下进行税收筹划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Corporate Governance Structure, Political Connections, and Transfer Pricing on Tax Aggressiveness
This research examines and analyzes the effect of corporate governance structures, political connections, and transfer pricing on tax aggressiveness (CETR and BTD). The theory used in this research is agency theory. The sample of this research is manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for 2014-2018. The sampling method used in this research was purposive sampling and used multiple linear regression as the data analysis method. The results of the study using the cash effective tax rates (CETR) proxy show that the independent board has a positive effect on tax aggressiveness, the audit committee has a negative effect on tax aggressiveness, political connections do not affect tax aggressiveness, and transfer pricing does not affect tax aggressiveness. The result of research with a proxy book-tax difference (BTD) shows that independent commissioners do not influence tax aggressiveness, audit committees positively affect tax aggressiveness, political connections do not affect tax aggressiveness, and transfer pricing does not affect tax aggressiveness. The implication of this research reveals that the companies should follow tax regulations made by the government to do tax planning under applicable laws.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信