Sp2PS:CAM图像的光谱和空间评价修剪得分

IF 3.4 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
D. Renza, D. Ballesteros
{"title":"Sp2PS:CAM图像的光谱和空间评价修剪得分","authors":"D. Renza, D. Ballesteros","doi":"10.3390/informatics10030072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CNN models can have millions of parameters, which makes them unattractive for some applications that require fast inference times or small memory footprints. To overcome this problem, one alternative is to identify and remove weights that have a small impact on the loss function of the algorithm, which is known as pruning. Typically, pruning methods are compared in terms of performance (e.g., accuracy), model size and inference speed. However, it is unusual to evaluate whether a pruned model preserves regions of importance in an image when performing inference. Consequently, we propose a metric to assess the impact of a pruning method based on images obtained by model interpretation (specifically, class activation maps). These images are spatially and spectrally compared and integrated by the harmonic mean for all samples in the test dataset. The results show that although the accuracy in a pruned model may remain relatively constant, the areas of attention for decision making are not necessarily preserved. Furthermore, the performance of pruning methods can be easily compared as a function of the proposed metric.","PeriodicalId":37100,"journal":{"name":"Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sp2PS: Pruning Score by Spectral and Spatial Evaluation of CAM Images\",\"authors\":\"D. Renza, D. Ballesteros\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/informatics10030072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CNN models can have millions of parameters, which makes them unattractive for some applications that require fast inference times or small memory footprints. To overcome this problem, one alternative is to identify and remove weights that have a small impact on the loss function of the algorithm, which is known as pruning. Typically, pruning methods are compared in terms of performance (e.g., accuracy), model size and inference speed. However, it is unusual to evaluate whether a pruned model preserves regions of importance in an image when performing inference. Consequently, we propose a metric to assess the impact of a pruning method based on images obtained by model interpretation (specifically, class activation maps). These images are spatially and spectrally compared and integrated by the harmonic mean for all samples in the test dataset. The results show that although the accuracy in a pruned model may remain relatively constant, the areas of attention for decision making are not necessarily preserved. Furthermore, the performance of pruning methods can be easily compared as a function of the proposed metric.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10030072\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10030072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

CNN模型可以有数百万个参数,这使得它们对一些需要快速推理时间或小内存占用的应用程序没有吸引力。为了克服这个问题,一种替代方法是识别和删除对算法的损失函数有小影响的权重,这被称为修剪。通常,修剪方法在性能(例如,准确性)、模型大小和推理速度方面进行比较。然而,在执行推理时,评估修剪模型是否保留图像中的重要区域是不寻常的。因此,我们提出了一个度量来评估基于模型解释获得的图像(特别是类激活图)的修剪方法的影响。这些图像在空间和频谱上进行比较,并通过测试数据集中所有样本的谐波平均值进行积分。结果表明,尽管修剪模型的精度可能保持相对恒定,但决策的注意区域不一定保留。此外,可以很容易地将修剪方法的性能作为所提出度量的函数进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sp2PS: Pruning Score by Spectral and Spatial Evaluation of CAM Images
CNN models can have millions of parameters, which makes them unattractive for some applications that require fast inference times or small memory footprints. To overcome this problem, one alternative is to identify and remove weights that have a small impact on the loss function of the algorithm, which is known as pruning. Typically, pruning methods are compared in terms of performance (e.g., accuracy), model size and inference speed. However, it is unusual to evaluate whether a pruned model preserves regions of importance in an image when performing inference. Consequently, we propose a metric to assess the impact of a pruning method based on images obtained by model interpretation (specifically, class activation maps). These images are spatially and spectrally compared and integrated by the harmonic mean for all samples in the test dataset. The results show that although the accuracy in a pruned model may remain relatively constant, the areas of attention for decision making are not necessarily preserved. Furthermore, the performance of pruning methods can be easily compared as a function of the proposed metric.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Informatics
Informatics Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
88
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信