图书馆员单次教学评估:一种评估教学绩效的新模式

IF 0.6 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Jacalyn E. Bryan, Darla Asher, Elana Karshmer
{"title":"图书馆员单次教学评估:一种评估教学绩效的新模式","authors":"Jacalyn E. Bryan, Darla Asher, Elana Karshmer","doi":"10.1080/10691316.2018.1527268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract It is essential that the tool used to evaluate librarians’ teaching is appropriate to the type of teaching and methodologies being utilized. In many cases, academic librarians are evaluated using the same tool as their nonlibrary counterparts. The purpose of this study was to determine whether academic libraries have specific methods and/or forms for evaluating librarians’ teaching of one-shot sessions. The goal of this research was to create an evaluation form specific to one-shot library instruction. This new assessment tool was informed by the data collected and also reflects professional guidelines and best practices.","PeriodicalId":44684,"journal":{"name":"College & Undergraduate Libraries","volume":"25 1","pages":"350 - 371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10691316.2018.1527268","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing librarians’ teaching of one-shot sessions: A new model for evaluating instructional performance\",\"authors\":\"Jacalyn E. Bryan, Darla Asher, Elana Karshmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10691316.2018.1527268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract It is essential that the tool used to evaluate librarians’ teaching is appropriate to the type of teaching and methodologies being utilized. In many cases, academic librarians are evaluated using the same tool as their nonlibrary counterparts. The purpose of this study was to determine whether academic libraries have specific methods and/or forms for evaluating librarians’ teaching of one-shot sessions. The goal of this research was to create an evaluation form specific to one-shot library instruction. This new assessment tool was informed by the data collected and also reflects professional guidelines and best practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"College & Undergraduate Libraries\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"350 - 371\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10691316.2018.1527268\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"College & Undergraduate Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2018.1527268\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"College & Undergraduate Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2018.1527268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

摘要用于评估图书馆员教学的工具与所使用的教学类型和方法相适应是至关重要的。在许多情况下,学术图书馆员使用与非图书馆同行相同的工具进行评估。本研究的目的是确定学术图书馆是否有具体的方法和/或形式来评估图书馆员的一次性课程教学。这项研究的目的是创建一个针对一次性图书馆教学的评估表。这一新的评估工具以收集的数据为依据,也反映了专业指导方针和最佳做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing librarians’ teaching of one-shot sessions: A new model for evaluating instructional performance
Abstract It is essential that the tool used to evaluate librarians’ teaching is appropriate to the type of teaching and methodologies being utilized. In many cases, academic librarians are evaluated using the same tool as their nonlibrary counterparts. The purpose of this study was to determine whether academic libraries have specific methods and/or forms for evaluating librarians’ teaching of one-shot sessions. The goal of this research was to create an evaluation form specific to one-shot library instruction. This new assessment tool was informed by the data collected and also reflects professional guidelines and best practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
College & Undergraduate Libraries
College & Undergraduate Libraries INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: College & Undergraduate Libraries enables libraries serving primarily undergraduate students to enhance the range of services, resources, and facilities offered to their constituents while also contributing to staff professional development. Whether focusing on public services, technical services, management, or technology, the journal highlights the fact that undergraduate libraries must collaborate with agencies both on and off campus in order to survive and thrive. In addition to numerous columns on current topics, typical contents include research-based articles, case studies, reports of best practices, an occasional literature review or product review, and opinion pieces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信