S. Dunsiger, B. Bock, S. Horowitz, R. Lantini, E. Jennings, H. Thind
{"title":"瑜伽戒烟试验中招募和保留广告的效果","authors":"S. Dunsiger, B. Bock, S. Horowitz, R. Lantini, E. Jennings, H. Thind","doi":"10.1080/19325037.2022.2071782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Few cessation studies have examined their recruitment methods to determine the most effective methods for enrollment and retention. Purpose Data from a randomized controlled trial of yoga for smoking cessation was used to evaluate recruitment methods (e.g., radio, referral) and their relationship to enrollment, participant characteristics, and retention at end of treatment (EOT). Methods Screening data from 1065 adults were analyzed for recruitment method, eligibility, randomization, and retention through EOT using Analysis of Variance and Chi-squared tests. Costs per enrolled participant were calculated. Results Rates of participant accrual from screening through randomization differed by recruitment method (p < .05), although there were no differences in retention post-randomization. Among randomized participants, the majority were recruited via radio (44%) and the least number via newspaper (5%). There were differences in baseline psychosocial (i.e., nicotine dependence, readiness to quit) and demographic (i.e., age, employment) characteristics of randomized participants (n = 227, 55.5% women) across recruitment methods. Differences in costs between recruitment methods (p < .001) were noted. Discussion Recruitment methods differed substantially in their cost and ability to attract individuals who would ultimately enroll. Translation to Health Education Practice: This investigation highlights the need to combine different recruitment methods to attract diverse individuals into cessation treatments. A AJHE Self-Study quiz is online for this article via the SHAPE America Online Institute (SAOI) http://portal.shapeamerica.org/trn-Webinars","PeriodicalId":46846,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Education","volume":"53 1","pages":"228 - 236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advertising Effectiveness for Recruitment and Retention in a Trial of Yoga for Smoking Cessation\",\"authors\":\"S. Dunsiger, B. Bock, S. Horowitz, R. Lantini, E. Jennings, H. Thind\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19325037.2022.2071782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background Few cessation studies have examined their recruitment methods to determine the most effective methods for enrollment and retention. Purpose Data from a randomized controlled trial of yoga for smoking cessation was used to evaluate recruitment methods (e.g., radio, referral) and their relationship to enrollment, participant characteristics, and retention at end of treatment (EOT). Methods Screening data from 1065 adults were analyzed for recruitment method, eligibility, randomization, and retention through EOT using Analysis of Variance and Chi-squared tests. Costs per enrolled participant were calculated. Results Rates of participant accrual from screening through randomization differed by recruitment method (p < .05), although there were no differences in retention post-randomization. Among randomized participants, the majority were recruited via radio (44%) and the least number via newspaper (5%). There were differences in baseline psychosocial (i.e., nicotine dependence, readiness to quit) and demographic (i.e., age, employment) characteristics of randomized participants (n = 227, 55.5% women) across recruitment methods. Differences in costs between recruitment methods (p < .001) were noted. Discussion Recruitment methods differed substantially in their cost and ability to attract individuals who would ultimately enroll. Translation to Health Education Practice: This investigation highlights the need to combine different recruitment methods to attract diverse individuals into cessation treatments. A AJHE Self-Study quiz is online for this article via the SHAPE America Online Institute (SAOI) http://portal.shapeamerica.org/trn-Webinars\",\"PeriodicalId\":46846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health Education\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"228 - 236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2022.2071782\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2022.2071782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Advertising Effectiveness for Recruitment and Retention in a Trial of Yoga for Smoking Cessation
ABSTRACT Background Few cessation studies have examined their recruitment methods to determine the most effective methods for enrollment and retention. Purpose Data from a randomized controlled trial of yoga for smoking cessation was used to evaluate recruitment methods (e.g., radio, referral) and their relationship to enrollment, participant characteristics, and retention at end of treatment (EOT). Methods Screening data from 1065 adults were analyzed for recruitment method, eligibility, randomization, and retention through EOT using Analysis of Variance and Chi-squared tests. Costs per enrolled participant were calculated. Results Rates of participant accrual from screening through randomization differed by recruitment method (p < .05), although there were no differences in retention post-randomization. Among randomized participants, the majority were recruited via radio (44%) and the least number via newspaper (5%). There were differences in baseline psychosocial (i.e., nicotine dependence, readiness to quit) and demographic (i.e., age, employment) characteristics of randomized participants (n = 227, 55.5% women) across recruitment methods. Differences in costs between recruitment methods (p < .001) were noted. Discussion Recruitment methods differed substantially in their cost and ability to attract individuals who would ultimately enroll. Translation to Health Education Practice: This investigation highlights the need to combine different recruitment methods to attract diverse individuals into cessation treatments. A AJHE Self-Study quiz is online for this article via the SHAPE America Online Institute (SAOI) http://portal.shapeamerica.org/trn-Webinars
期刊介绍:
AJHE is sponsored by the American Association for Health Education of the American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance. The mission of the American Association for Health Education(AAHE) is to advance the profession by serving health educators and others who strive to promote the health of all people through education and other systematic strategies.AAHE addresses the following priorities •Develop and promulgate standards, resources and services regarding health education to professionals and non-professionals •Foster the development of national research priorities in health education and promotion. Provide mechanisms for the translation and interaction between theory, research and practice.