COVID-19疫苗诱导的慢性假阳性快速血浆反应素(RPR)试验

COVID Pub Date : 2023-08-30 DOI:10.3390/covid3090090
E. Williams, Devin J. Kennedy, Michael E. Hoffer, J. M. Carreño, F. Krammer, S. Pallikkuth, S. Pahwa
{"title":"COVID-19疫苗诱导的慢性假阳性快速血浆反应素(RPR)试验","authors":"E. Williams, Devin J. Kennedy, Michael E. Hoffer, J. M. Carreño, F. Krammer, S. Pallikkuth, S. Pahwa","doi":"10.3390/covid3090090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"False positive reactive plasmin reagin (RPR) reactivity following a COVID-19 vaccine has been reported, and it is therefore conceivable that individuals who receive frequent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccinations may exhibit durable RPR responses. Here, we sought to investigate the extent to which repeated mRNA COVID-19 vaccines can elicit chronic false RPR reactivity in a longitudinal cohort. Participants (n = 119) in an IRB-approved (#20201026), longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 cohort study were screened for RPR reactivity via manual RPR card assays. Samples with reactive results underwent additional testing, including follow-on RPR screening at additional timepoints, confirmatory fluorescent treponemal antibody (FTA-ABS) testing and anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) testing. Medical histories were collected. We observed (n = 2) screen-positive RPR results (1.7% [2/119]) following booster vaccination, for which two individuals exhibited chronic, vaccine-induced RPR reactivity for up to 9 months following booster vaccination. Both participants were ANA-negative. It is imperative for clinicians to be mindful of the potential immunologic interference of COVID-19 vaccines with standard infectious disease assays, including RPR testing. Detailed medical histories and clinical contexts, including recent vaccination, should be reviewed prior to proceeding with distressing and invasive workups.","PeriodicalId":72714,"journal":{"name":"COVID","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chronic False Positive Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) Tests Induced by COVID-19 Vaccination\",\"authors\":\"E. Williams, Devin J. Kennedy, Michael E. Hoffer, J. M. Carreño, F. Krammer, S. Pallikkuth, S. Pahwa\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/covid3090090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"False positive reactive plasmin reagin (RPR) reactivity following a COVID-19 vaccine has been reported, and it is therefore conceivable that individuals who receive frequent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccinations may exhibit durable RPR responses. Here, we sought to investigate the extent to which repeated mRNA COVID-19 vaccines can elicit chronic false RPR reactivity in a longitudinal cohort. Participants (n = 119) in an IRB-approved (#20201026), longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 cohort study were screened for RPR reactivity via manual RPR card assays. Samples with reactive results underwent additional testing, including follow-on RPR screening at additional timepoints, confirmatory fluorescent treponemal antibody (FTA-ABS) testing and anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) testing. Medical histories were collected. We observed (n = 2) screen-positive RPR results (1.7% [2/119]) following booster vaccination, for which two individuals exhibited chronic, vaccine-induced RPR reactivity for up to 9 months following booster vaccination. Both participants were ANA-negative. It is imperative for clinicians to be mindful of the potential immunologic interference of COVID-19 vaccines with standard infectious disease assays, including RPR testing. Detailed medical histories and clinical contexts, including recent vaccination, should be reviewed prior to proceeding with distressing and invasive workups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COVID\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COVID\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/covid3090090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COVID","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/covid3090090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据报道,在接种COVID-19疫苗后,反应性纤溶酶反应蛋白(RPR)反应性出现假阳性,因此可以想象,频繁接种2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗的个体可能会表现出持久的RPR反应。在此,我们试图在纵向队列中研究重复mRNA COVID-19疫苗可在多大程度上引发慢性假RPR反应性。在irb批准的纵向SARS-CoV-2队列研究(#20201026)中,参与者(n = 119)通过人工RPR卡测定筛选RPR反应性。对反应性结果的样本进行额外的检测,包括在额外的时间点进行后续的RPR筛选、确认性荧光螺旋体抗体(FTA-ABS)检测和抗核抗体(ANA)检测。收集病史。我们观察到(n = 2)强化疫苗接种后RPR筛查阳性(1.7%[2/119]),其中2人在强化疫苗接种后表现出慢性疫苗诱导的RPR反应长达9个月。两名参与者均为ana阴性。临床医生必须注意COVID-19疫苗与标准传染病检测(包括RPR检测)的潜在免疫干扰。详细的病史和临床背景,包括最近的疫苗接种,应在进行痛苦和侵入性检查之前进行审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chronic False Positive Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) Tests Induced by COVID-19 Vaccination
False positive reactive plasmin reagin (RPR) reactivity following a COVID-19 vaccine has been reported, and it is therefore conceivable that individuals who receive frequent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccinations may exhibit durable RPR responses. Here, we sought to investigate the extent to which repeated mRNA COVID-19 vaccines can elicit chronic false RPR reactivity in a longitudinal cohort. Participants (n = 119) in an IRB-approved (#20201026), longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 cohort study were screened for RPR reactivity via manual RPR card assays. Samples with reactive results underwent additional testing, including follow-on RPR screening at additional timepoints, confirmatory fluorescent treponemal antibody (FTA-ABS) testing and anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) testing. Medical histories were collected. We observed (n = 2) screen-positive RPR results (1.7% [2/119]) following booster vaccination, for which two individuals exhibited chronic, vaccine-induced RPR reactivity for up to 9 months following booster vaccination. Both participants were ANA-negative. It is imperative for clinicians to be mindful of the potential immunologic interference of COVID-19 vaccines with standard infectious disease assays, including RPR testing. Detailed medical histories and clinical contexts, including recent vaccination, should be reviewed prior to proceeding with distressing and invasive workups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信