在“大衰退”之后:将“健全”的成年人排除在美国的食品津贴之外

Karen D’Angelo, K. Libal, N. Seymour, Renee Hamel
{"title":"在“大衰退”之后:将“健全”的成年人排除在美国的食品津贴之外","authors":"Karen D’Angelo, K. Libal, N. Seymour, Renee Hamel","doi":"10.1080/15588742.2017.1344604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A little-known provision to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), excluding those who are “able-bodied adults without dependents” (ABAWDs) from accessing long-term benefits without conforming to work requirements or eligibility guidelines, was recently reinstated at federal and state levels. States have considerable discretion in implementing the ABAWD provision, resulting in differential access to SNAP benefits. This article provides an analysis of the historical and political context of the ABAWD provision and its relevance to social work. An examination of several states’ different approaches to implementing the ABAWD rule underscores the limits of this policy and the consequent need for social work engagement and advocacy.","PeriodicalId":91762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of policy practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"452 - 471"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15588742.2017.1344604","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"After the “Great Recession”: Excluding “Able-Bodied” Adults from Food Entitlements in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Karen D’Angelo, K. Libal, N. Seymour, Renee Hamel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15588742.2017.1344604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT A little-known provision to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), excluding those who are “able-bodied adults without dependents” (ABAWDs) from accessing long-term benefits without conforming to work requirements or eligibility guidelines, was recently reinstated at federal and state levels. States have considerable discretion in implementing the ABAWD provision, resulting in differential access to SNAP benefits. This article provides an analysis of the historical and political context of the ABAWD provision and its relevance to social work. An examination of several states’ different approaches to implementing the ABAWD rule underscores the limits of this policy and the consequent need for social work engagement and advocacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of policy practice\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"452 - 471\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15588742.2017.1344604\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of policy practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15588742.2017.1344604\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of policy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15588742.2017.1344604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

最近,联邦和州恢复了一项鲜为人知的补充营养援助计划(SNAP)条款,该条款将那些“没有家属的健全成年人”(abawd)排除在不符合工作要求或资格指南的情况下获得长期福利。各州在实施ABAWD条款方面有相当大的自由裁量权,导致对SNAP福利的不同获取。本文分析了ABAWD规定的历史和政治背景及其与社会工作的相关性。对几个州实施ABAWD规则的不同方法的检查强调了该政策的局限性以及随之而来的社会工作参与和倡导的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
After the “Great Recession”: Excluding “Able-Bodied” Adults from Food Entitlements in the United States
ABSTRACT A little-known provision to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), excluding those who are “able-bodied adults without dependents” (ABAWDs) from accessing long-term benefits without conforming to work requirements or eligibility guidelines, was recently reinstated at federal and state levels. States have considerable discretion in implementing the ABAWD provision, resulting in differential access to SNAP benefits. This article provides an analysis of the historical and political context of the ABAWD provision and its relevance to social work. An examination of several states’ different approaches to implementing the ABAWD rule underscores the limits of this policy and the consequent need for social work engagement and advocacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信