简·奥斯丁的美国化:近期《爱玛》改编中的民主原则

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Ars Aeterna Pub Date : 2017-06-27 DOI:10.1515/aa-2017-0004
E. Jelínková
{"title":"简·奥斯丁的美国化:近期《爱玛》改编中的民主原则","authors":"E. Jelínková","doi":"10.1515/aa-2017-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract When they first reached an American readership, Jane Austen’s novels enjoyed mixed reactions among intellectuals. The main charge levelled against Jane Austen’s fiction was that it conflicted with the democratic principles American society was based on. The next century brought about an explosion in the attention paid to Jane Austen, whether via adaptations, spinoffs, biopics, musicals, detective fiction, scholarly texts, societies or even websites. Most of these creative extensions of Jane Austen’s ideas (and her personality) seem to embrace contemporary American values and sensibilities and therefore, logically, make attempts at revising some of the less palatable aspects of the English society of the Regency era. This paper focuses on two prime examples of such a revisionist approach to Jane Austen’s most classconscious novel, Emma, in Douglas McGrath’s eponymous 1996 film adaptation and in Clueless, Amy Heckerling’s 1995 satirical film based on the same novel.","PeriodicalId":37754,"journal":{"name":"Ars Aeterna","volume":"9 1","pages":"29 - 34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jane Austen Americanized: The democratic principle in recent adaptations of Emma\",\"authors\":\"E. Jelínková\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/aa-2017-0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract When they first reached an American readership, Jane Austen’s novels enjoyed mixed reactions among intellectuals. The main charge levelled against Jane Austen’s fiction was that it conflicted with the democratic principles American society was based on. The next century brought about an explosion in the attention paid to Jane Austen, whether via adaptations, spinoffs, biopics, musicals, detective fiction, scholarly texts, societies or even websites. Most of these creative extensions of Jane Austen’s ideas (and her personality) seem to embrace contemporary American values and sensibilities and therefore, logically, make attempts at revising some of the less palatable aspects of the English society of the Regency era. This paper focuses on two prime examples of such a revisionist approach to Jane Austen’s most classconscious novel, Emma, in Douglas McGrath’s eponymous 1996 film adaptation and in Clueless, Amy Heckerling’s 1995 satirical film based on the same novel.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ars Aeterna\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"29 - 34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ars Aeterna\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/aa-2017-0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ars Aeterna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/aa-2017-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简·奥斯丁的小说首次进入美国读者群时,知识分子的反应不一。对简·奥斯汀小说的主要指控是它与美国社会所依据的民主原则相冲突。在接下来的一个世纪里,无论是通过改编、衍生作品、传记片、音乐剧、侦探小说、学术文本、社团甚至网站,人们对简·奥斯汀的关注都出现了爆炸式增长。简·奥斯丁的思想(和她的个性)的这些创造性延伸似乎都包含了当代美国人的价值观和情感,因此,从逻辑上讲,他们试图修正摄政时代英国社会中一些不那么令人愉快的方面。本文主要关注的是对简·奥斯汀最具阶级意识的小说《艾玛》采用这种修正主义方法的两个主要例子,分别是道格拉斯·麦格拉思1996年改编的同名电影和艾米·海克林1995年改编的讽刺电影《独领天下》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Jane Austen Americanized: The democratic principle in recent adaptations of Emma
Abstract When they first reached an American readership, Jane Austen’s novels enjoyed mixed reactions among intellectuals. The main charge levelled against Jane Austen’s fiction was that it conflicted with the democratic principles American society was based on. The next century brought about an explosion in the attention paid to Jane Austen, whether via adaptations, spinoffs, biopics, musicals, detective fiction, scholarly texts, societies or even websites. Most of these creative extensions of Jane Austen’s ideas (and her personality) seem to embrace contemporary American values and sensibilities and therefore, logically, make attempts at revising some of the less palatable aspects of the English society of the Regency era. This paper focuses on two prime examples of such a revisionist approach to Jane Austen’s most classconscious novel, Emma, in Douglas McGrath’s eponymous 1996 film adaptation and in Clueless, Amy Heckerling’s 1995 satirical film based on the same novel.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ars Aeterna
Ars Aeterna Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: The multidisciplinary journal focused on the questions of art and its importance in the contemporary world for the development of culture, mutual understanding, and the human Self.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信