缺失“如果”的情况:斯托纳克条件句理论中的可及性关系

IF 1.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Semantics & Pragmatics Pub Date : 2018-06-12 DOI:10.3765/SP.11.8

M. Mandelkern

{"title":"缺失“如果”的情况:斯托纳克条件句理论中的可及性关系","authors":"M. Mandelkern","doi":"10.3765/SP.11.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A part of Stalnaker (1968)’s influential theory of conditionals has been neglected, namely the role for an accessibility relation between worlds. I argue that the accessibility relation does not play the role intended for it in the theory as stated, and propose a minimal revision which solves the problem, and brings the theory in line with the formulation in Stalnaker & Thomason 1970. \n \nEARLY ACCESS","PeriodicalId":45550,"journal":{"name":"Semantics & Pragmatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The case of the missing ‘If’: Accessibility relations in Stalnaker’s theory of conditionals\",\"authors\":\"M. Mandelkern\",\"doi\":\"10.3765/SP.11.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A part of Stalnaker (1968)’s influential theory of conditionals has been neglected, namely the role for an accessibility relation between worlds. I argue that the accessibility relation does not play the role intended for it in the theory as stated, and propose a minimal revision which solves the problem, and brings the theory in line with the formulation in Stalnaker & Thomason 1970. \\n \\nEARLY ACCESS\",\"PeriodicalId\":45550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Semantics & Pragmatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Semantics & Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3765/SP.11.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Semantics & Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3765/SP.11.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

Stalnaker（1968）有影响力的条件句理论的一部分被忽视了，即世界之间可及关系的作用。我认为，可达性关系并没有在所述理论中发挥应有的作用，并提出了一个解决问题的最小修正案，使该理论与Stalnaker和Thomason 1970年的公式一致。早期访问

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The case of the missing ‘If’: Accessibility relations in Stalnaker’s theory of conditionals

A part of Stalnaker (1968)’s influential theory of conditionals has been neglected, namely the role for an accessibility relation between worlds. I argue that the accessibility relation does not play the role intended for it in the theory as stated, and propose a minimal revision which solves the problem, and brings the theory in line with the formulation in Stalnaker & Thomason 1970. EARLY ACCESS

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Semantics & Pragmatics Multiple-

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

50 weeks