通过声波生物表面活性剂分解从大型藻类生产生物氢:一种节能方法

IF 12.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Shabarish S. , Tamilarasan K. , Rajesh Banu J. , Godvin Sharmila V.
{"title":"通过声波生物表面活性剂分解从大型藻类生产生物氢:一种节能方法","authors":"Shabarish S. ,&nbsp;Tamilarasan K. ,&nbsp;Rajesh Banu J. ,&nbsp;Godvin Sharmila V.","doi":"10.1016/j.resenv.2022.100093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An energy-efficient disintegration approach used to produce biohydrogen from marine macroalgae biomass (<em>Chaetomorpha antennina</em>) was demonstrated in this study. The suggested research aimed to explain the function of macroalgae disintegration by sonication (DS) and disintegration by a sonic surfactant (DSS) in biohydrogen production. Biosurfactant dosage (3 <span><math><mi>μ</mi></math></span>L/g TS), sonic intensity (50%) and disintegration duration (30 min) were found to be an optimum conditions for DSS with respect to dissoluted organics release (DOR). Volatile fatty acids (VFA) generation was higher in DSS (1845 mg/L) than DS (864 mg/L) When DS and DSS were compared, DSS had a substantially higher disintegration efficiency (DE) and biohydrogen yield (26%, 147 mL <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>/gCOD) than DS (21.5%, 121 mL <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>/gCOD). Net energy (NE) obtained in DSS (0.044 kWh/kg of biomass) was more than the DS (−0.02 kWh/kg of biomass). DSS had a higher energy ratio of 1.8, while DS had a lower energy ratio of 0.7. Overall, DSS was found to be an energetic way to produce biohydrogen.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34479,"journal":{"name":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100093"},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biohydrogen production from macroalgae via sonic biosurfactant disintegration: An energy efficient approach\",\"authors\":\"Shabarish S. ,&nbsp;Tamilarasan K. ,&nbsp;Rajesh Banu J. ,&nbsp;Godvin Sharmila V.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resenv.2022.100093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>An energy-efficient disintegration approach used to produce biohydrogen from marine macroalgae biomass (<em>Chaetomorpha antennina</em>) was demonstrated in this study. The suggested research aimed to explain the function of macroalgae disintegration by sonication (DS) and disintegration by a sonic surfactant (DSS) in biohydrogen production. Biosurfactant dosage (3 <span><math><mi>μ</mi></math></span>L/g TS), sonic intensity (50%) and disintegration duration (30 min) were found to be an optimum conditions for DSS with respect to dissoluted organics release (DOR). Volatile fatty acids (VFA) generation was higher in DSS (1845 mg/L) than DS (864 mg/L) When DS and DSS were compared, DSS had a substantially higher disintegration efficiency (DE) and biohydrogen yield (26%, 147 mL <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>/gCOD) than DS (21.5%, 121 mL <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>/gCOD). Net energy (NE) obtained in DSS (0.044 kWh/kg of biomass) was more than the DS (−0.02 kWh/kg of biomass). DSS had a higher energy ratio of 1.8, while DS had a lower energy ratio of 0.7. Overall, DSS was found to be an energetic way to produce biohydrogen.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Environment and Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100093\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Environment and Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916122000378\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916122000378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究展示了一种利用大型海藻生物质(Chaetomorpha antennina)高效分解生产生物氢的方法。本研究旨在解释大型藻类的超声分解(DS)和超声表面活性剂(DSS)在生物制氢中的作用。生物表面活性剂用量(3 μL/g TS)、声波强度(50%)和崩解时间(30 min)是DSS溶出有机物(DOR)的最佳条件。DSS的挥发性脂肪酸(VFA)生成量(1845 mg/L)高于DS (864 mg/L)。比较DSS和DSS的降解效率(26%,147 mL H2/gCOD)和生物氢产率(21.5%,121 mL H2/gCOD), DSS的降解效率(26%,147 mL H2/gCOD)显著高于DS (21.5%, 121 mL H2/gCOD)。DSS获得的净能量(0.044 kWh/kg生物质)大于DS (- 0.02 kWh/kg生物质)。DSS的能量比较高,为1.8,而DS的能量比较低,为0.7。总的来说,DSS被认为是一种高效的生产生物氢的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Biohydrogen production from macroalgae via sonic biosurfactant disintegration: An energy efficient approach

Biohydrogen production from macroalgae via sonic biosurfactant disintegration: An energy efficient approach

An energy-efficient disintegration approach used to produce biohydrogen from marine macroalgae biomass (Chaetomorpha antennina) was demonstrated in this study. The suggested research aimed to explain the function of macroalgae disintegration by sonication (DS) and disintegration by a sonic surfactant (DSS) in biohydrogen production. Biosurfactant dosage (3 μL/g TS), sonic intensity (50%) and disintegration duration (30 min) were found to be an optimum conditions for DSS with respect to dissoluted organics release (DOR). Volatile fatty acids (VFA) generation was higher in DSS (1845 mg/L) than DS (864 mg/L) When DS and DSS were compared, DSS had a substantially higher disintegration efficiency (DE) and biohydrogen yield (26%, 147 mL H2/gCOD) than DS (21.5%, 121 mL H2/gCOD). Net energy (NE) obtained in DSS (0.044 kWh/kg of biomass) was more than the DS (−0.02 kWh/kg of biomass). DSS had a higher energy ratio of 1.8, while DS had a lower energy ratio of 0.7. Overall, DSS was found to be an energetic way to produce biohydrogen.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Environment and Sustainability
Resources Environment and Sustainability Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
33 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信