社会网络对综合报告采用和实施的影响——英国视角

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Fiona Robertson
{"title":"社会网络对综合报告采用和实施的影响——英国视角","authors":"Fiona Robertson","doi":"10.1108/JGR-08-2020-0080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose This paper sought to investigate social network influences on UK Integrated Reporting ( ) adoption and implementation. Design/methodology/approach The study was based on in-depth semi-structured interviews with 36 senior executives actively involved in within 17 organisations. Findings Main social network influences on adoption externally were report design consultants, and to a lesser extent, external auditors, primarily to legitimize . Internal influences were board support for , with the main driver being the mind-set of the CFO/Chairman to drive sustainability throughout the organisation, or to regain societal trust. Social network influences aiding further diffusion at the implementation stage came from three external sources: business networks; report design consultants; and external auditor. Internal influences in driving diffusion within organisations were identified in five functional areas, with Finance, Sustainability and Communications functions exerting greatest external influence on the diffusion of . Research Limitations This research study was limited by the small sample of organisations that participated, although significant efforts were made to ensure that the sample incorporated the majority of early adopter UK organisations who demonstrated best practice in . Therefore, the findings are specific to the research context and do not represent statistical generalisations. Practical implications Empirical evidence identifying social network influences from a practitioner perspective provide recommendations as to how may be further diffused in the future. Social Implications creates the potential to significantly improve the long-term health of corporations and the external environment they impact through consideration of the three indivisible and integrated dimensions of sustainable development, the economy, society, and the environment and can contribute to a sustainable society by providing the opportunity for organizations to respond to the UN Sustainable Development Goals. This highlights the significance of research which aims to gain insights into social network influences which can assist in the adoption and implementation of . Originality/value This is the first comprehensive study of social network influences on the adoption and implementation practices in UK. It incorporates recommendations to improve the likelihood of subsequent adoption and diffusion of based on the findings.","PeriodicalId":45268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Responsibility","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Network Influences on Integrated Reporting adoption and implementation – A UK Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Fiona Robertson\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/JGR-08-2020-0080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Purpose This paper sought to investigate social network influences on UK Integrated Reporting ( ) adoption and implementation. Design/methodology/approach The study was based on in-depth semi-structured interviews with 36 senior executives actively involved in within 17 organisations. Findings Main social network influences on adoption externally were report design consultants, and to a lesser extent, external auditors, primarily to legitimize . Internal influences were board support for , with the main driver being the mind-set of the CFO/Chairman to drive sustainability throughout the organisation, or to regain societal trust. Social network influences aiding further diffusion at the implementation stage came from three external sources: business networks; report design consultants; and external auditor. Internal influences in driving diffusion within organisations were identified in five functional areas, with Finance, Sustainability and Communications functions exerting greatest external influence on the diffusion of . Research Limitations This research study was limited by the small sample of organisations that participated, although significant efforts were made to ensure that the sample incorporated the majority of early adopter UK organisations who demonstrated best practice in . Therefore, the findings are specific to the research context and do not represent statistical generalisations. Practical implications Empirical evidence identifying social network influences from a practitioner perspective provide recommendations as to how may be further diffused in the future. Social Implications creates the potential to significantly improve the long-term health of corporations and the external environment they impact through consideration of the three indivisible and integrated dimensions of sustainable development, the economy, society, and the environment and can contribute to a sustainable society by providing the opportunity for organizations to respond to the UN Sustainable Development Goals. This highlights the significance of research which aims to gain insights into social network influences which can assist in the adoption and implementation of . Originality/value This is the first comprehensive study of social network influences on the adoption and implementation practices in UK. It incorporates recommendations to improve the likelihood of subsequent adoption and diffusion of based on the findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Responsibility\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Responsibility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-08-2020-0080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Responsibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-08-2020-0080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要目的研究社会网络对英国综合报告采用和实施的影响。设计/方法/方法该研究基于对17个组织中36名高级管理人员的深入半结构化访谈。社会网络对采用的外部影响主要是报告设计顾问,其次是外部审计师,主要是合法化。内部影响是董事会的支持,主要驱动因素是首席财务官/董事长的心态,以推动整个组织的可持续性,或重新获得社会信任。在实施阶段帮助进一步扩散的社会网络影响来自三个外部来源:商业网络;报告设计顾问;还有外部审计员。在推动组织内部传播的内部影响被确定为五个功能领域,财务、可持续发展和通信功能对传播的外部影响最大。本研究受到参与组织的小样本的限制,尽管做出了重大努力,以确保样本纳入了大多数早期采用者英国组织,这些组织在…因此,这些发现是特定于研究背景的,并不代表统计上的概括。实践意义从实践者的角度确定社会网络影响的经验证据为未来如何进一步扩散提供了建议。社会影响通过考虑可持续发展的三个不可分割和综合的维度,即经济、社会和环境,创造了显著改善企业长期健康状况及其所影响的外部环境的潜力,并可以通过为组织提供响应联合国可持续发展目标的机会,为可持续社会做出贡献。这凸显了研究的重要性,该研究旨在深入了解社会网络的影响,从而有助于采用和实施。原创性/价值这是英国首次全面研究社交网络对采用和实施实践的影响。它根据调查结果提出了建议,以提高后续通过和传播的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Network Influences on Integrated Reporting adoption and implementation – A UK Perspective
Abstract Purpose This paper sought to investigate social network influences on UK Integrated Reporting ( ) adoption and implementation. Design/methodology/approach The study was based on in-depth semi-structured interviews with 36 senior executives actively involved in within 17 organisations. Findings Main social network influences on adoption externally were report design consultants, and to a lesser extent, external auditors, primarily to legitimize . Internal influences were board support for , with the main driver being the mind-set of the CFO/Chairman to drive sustainability throughout the organisation, or to regain societal trust. Social network influences aiding further diffusion at the implementation stage came from three external sources: business networks; report design consultants; and external auditor. Internal influences in driving diffusion within organisations were identified in five functional areas, with Finance, Sustainability and Communications functions exerting greatest external influence on the diffusion of . Research Limitations This research study was limited by the small sample of organisations that participated, although significant efforts were made to ensure that the sample incorporated the majority of early adopter UK organisations who demonstrated best practice in . Therefore, the findings are specific to the research context and do not represent statistical generalisations. Practical implications Empirical evidence identifying social network influences from a practitioner perspective provide recommendations as to how may be further diffused in the future. Social Implications creates the potential to significantly improve the long-term health of corporations and the external environment they impact through consideration of the three indivisible and integrated dimensions of sustainable development, the economy, society, and the environment and can contribute to a sustainable society by providing the opportunity for organizations to respond to the UN Sustainable Development Goals. This highlights the significance of research which aims to gain insights into social network influences which can assist in the adoption and implementation of . Originality/value This is the first comprehensive study of social network influences on the adoption and implementation practices in UK. It incorporates recommendations to improve the likelihood of subsequent adoption and diffusion of based on the findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
18.80%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信