风沙输运:平均跃变长度和高度的标度及其对质量通量标度的影响

IF 3.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Thomas Pähtz , Katharina Tholen
{"title":"风沙输运:平均跃变长度和高度的标度及其对质量通量标度的影响","authors":"Thomas Pähtz ,&nbsp;Katharina Tholen","doi":"10.1016/j.aeolia.2021.100730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Wind tunnel measurements of the mean saltation length </span><em>L</em> and of different proxies of the mean saltation height <em>H</em> in saturated aeolian sand transport indicate that <em>L</em> and <em>H</em><span> are relatively insensitive to both the wind speed and grain diameter </span><em>d</em>. The latter result is currently unexplained and contradicts the theoretical prediction <span><math><mrow><mi>L</mi><mo>∝</mo><mi>H</mi><mo>∝</mo><mi>d</mi></mrow></math></span>. This prediction is based on the assumption that the characteristic velocity <span><math><mrow><msqrt><mrow><mover><mrow><mi>g</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>̃</mo></mrow></mover><mi>d</mi></mrow></msqrt></mrow></math></span><span> of bed grains ejected by the splash of an impacting grain controls the average saltation kinematics. Here, we show that a recent analytical saltation model that considers only rebounds of saltating grains, but neglects splash ejection, is consistent with the measurements. The model suggests that the buffer layer of the inner turbulent boundary layer, which connects the viscous sublayer with the log-layer, is partially responsible for the insensitivity of </span><em>L</em> and <em>H</em> to <em>d</em>. In combination, the measurements and model therefore indicate that splash ejection, though important to sustain saltation, does not significantly affect the average saltation kinematics. This finding represents a strong argument against the Ungar and Haff (1987)-scaling and in favor of the Durán et al. (2011)-scaling of the saturated saltation mass flux, with implications for ripple formation on Mars. Furthermore, it supports the recent controversial claim that this flux is insensitive to soil cohesion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49246,"journal":{"name":"Aeolian Research","volume":"52 ","pages":"Article 100730"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aeolia.2021.100730","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aeolian sand transport: Scaling of mean saltation length and height and implications for mass flux scaling\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Pähtz ,&nbsp;Katharina Tholen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aeolia.2021.100730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Wind tunnel measurements of the mean saltation length </span><em>L</em> and of different proxies of the mean saltation height <em>H</em> in saturated aeolian sand transport indicate that <em>L</em> and <em>H</em><span> are relatively insensitive to both the wind speed and grain diameter </span><em>d</em>. The latter result is currently unexplained and contradicts the theoretical prediction <span><math><mrow><mi>L</mi><mo>∝</mo><mi>H</mi><mo>∝</mo><mi>d</mi></mrow></math></span>. This prediction is based on the assumption that the characteristic velocity <span><math><mrow><msqrt><mrow><mover><mrow><mi>g</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>̃</mo></mrow></mover><mi>d</mi></mrow></msqrt></mrow></math></span><span> of bed grains ejected by the splash of an impacting grain controls the average saltation kinematics. Here, we show that a recent analytical saltation model that considers only rebounds of saltating grains, but neglects splash ejection, is consistent with the measurements. The model suggests that the buffer layer of the inner turbulent boundary layer, which connects the viscous sublayer with the log-layer, is partially responsible for the insensitivity of </span><em>L</em> and <em>H</em> to <em>d</em>. In combination, the measurements and model therefore indicate that splash ejection, though important to sustain saltation, does not significantly affect the average saltation kinematics. This finding represents a strong argument against the Ungar and Haff (1987)-scaling and in favor of the Durán et al. (2011)-scaling of the saturated saltation mass flux, with implications for ripple formation on Mars. Furthermore, it supports the recent controversial claim that this flux is insensitive to soil cohesion.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aeolian Research\",\"volume\":\"52 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100730\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aeolia.2021.100730\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aeolian Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875963721000677\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aeolian Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875963721000677","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

风洞测量结果表明,饱和风沙输沙过程中平均跃迁长度L和平均跃迁高度H对风速和粒径d均不敏感,后者的结果目前无法解释,与理论预测L∝H∝d相矛盾。这一预测是基于这样一个假设,即由撞击颗粒飞溅喷出的床层颗粒的特征速度g / d控制着平均跳跃运动学。在这里,我们表明,最近的分析跳跃模型,只考虑弹跳颗粒的反弹,但忽略飞溅喷射,是一致的测量。该模型表明,连接粘性亚层和对数层的内湍流边界层缓冲层是L和H对d不敏感的部分原因。因此,测量和模型结合表明,飞溅弹射虽然对维持跳跃很重要,但对平均跳跃运动学没有显著影响。这一发现有力地反驳了Ungar和Haff(1987)的尺度,而支持Durán等人(2011)的饱和跃动质量通量的尺度,并暗示了火星上涟漪的形成。此外,它支持了最近有争议的说法,即这种通量对土壤黏聚力不敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aeolian sand transport: Scaling of mean saltation length and height and implications for mass flux scaling

Wind tunnel measurements of the mean saltation length L and of different proxies of the mean saltation height H in saturated aeolian sand transport indicate that L and H are relatively insensitive to both the wind speed and grain diameter d. The latter result is currently unexplained and contradicts the theoretical prediction LHd. This prediction is based on the assumption that the characteristic velocity g̃d of bed grains ejected by the splash of an impacting grain controls the average saltation kinematics. Here, we show that a recent analytical saltation model that considers only rebounds of saltating grains, but neglects splash ejection, is consistent with the measurements. The model suggests that the buffer layer of the inner turbulent boundary layer, which connects the viscous sublayer with the log-layer, is partially responsible for the insensitivity of L and H to d. In combination, the measurements and model therefore indicate that splash ejection, though important to sustain saltation, does not significantly affect the average saltation kinematics. This finding represents a strong argument against the Ungar and Haff (1987)-scaling and in favor of the Durán et al. (2011)-scaling of the saturated saltation mass flux, with implications for ripple formation on Mars. Furthermore, it supports the recent controversial claim that this flux is insensitive to soil cohesion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aeolian Research
Aeolian Research GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Aeolian Research includes the following topics: • Fundamental Aeolian processes, including sand and dust entrainment, transport and deposition of sediment • Modeling and field studies of Aeolian processes • Instrumentation/measurement in the field and lab • Practical applications including environmental impacts and erosion control • Aeolian landforms, geomorphology and paleoenvironments • Dust-atmosphere/cloud interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信