VocabLab测试

IF 2.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
E. Peters, T. Velghe, Tinne van Rompaey
{"title":"VocabLab测试","authors":"E. Peters, T. Velghe, Tinne van Rompaey","doi":"10.1075/ITL.17029.PET","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study describes the development of an English and French multiple choice vocabulary test – the\n VocabLab tests – that measure learners’ knowledge at four frequency levels up to the most frequent 5,000\n words: the 2,000-level, 3,000-level, 4,000-level, and the 5,000-level. The two tests aimed to address some of the limitations of\n tests currently in use. First, they are sampled from recent frequency lists. Second, they are geared towards Dutch-speaking\n learners of English and French in Flanders. Third, they attempt to minimize guessing by including an “I don’t know”-option. The\n findings showed that the tests are internally consistent. Mean scores decreased when the words were less frequent, lending\n evidence to the tests’ construct validity. Additionally, the tests seem to be able to discriminate between different proficiency\n levels. As both tests were developed according to the same principles, they can be used to compare learners’ English and French\n vocabulary knowledge.","PeriodicalId":53175,"journal":{"name":"ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics (Belgium)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The VocabLab tests\",\"authors\":\"E. Peters, T. Velghe, Tinne van Rompaey\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ITL.17029.PET\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study describes the development of an English and French multiple choice vocabulary test – the\\n VocabLab tests – that measure learners’ knowledge at four frequency levels up to the most frequent 5,000\\n words: the 2,000-level, 3,000-level, 4,000-level, and the 5,000-level. The two tests aimed to address some of the limitations of\\n tests currently in use. First, they are sampled from recent frequency lists. Second, they are geared towards Dutch-speaking\\n learners of English and French in Flanders. Third, they attempt to minimize guessing by including an “I don’t know”-option. The\\n findings showed that the tests are internally consistent. Mean scores decreased when the words were less frequent, lending\\n evidence to the tests’ construct validity. Additionally, the tests seem to be able to discriminate between different proficiency\\n levels. As both tests were developed according to the same principles, they can be used to compare learners’ English and French\\n vocabulary knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics (Belgium)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics (Belgium)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ITL.17029.PET\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics (Belgium)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ITL.17029.PET","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本研究描述了英语和法语多项选择词汇测试(VocabLab测试)的发展,该测试测量了学习者在四个频率级别的知识,最高可达5000个单词:2000级别、3000级别、4000级别和5000级别。这两项测试旨在解决目前使用的测试的一些局限性。首先,它们是从最近的频率列表中采样的。其次,它们面向法兰德斯的荷兰语英语和法语学习者。第三,他们试图通过包含“我不知道”选项来尽量减少猜测。研究结果表明,这些测试在内部是一致的。当单词不太频繁时,平均得分会下降,这为测试的结构有效性提供了证据。此外,这些测试似乎能够区分不同的熟练程度。由于这两项测试都是根据相同的原则开发的,因此可以用来比较学习者的英语和法语词汇知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The VocabLab tests
This study describes the development of an English and French multiple choice vocabulary test – the VocabLab tests – that measure learners’ knowledge at four frequency levels up to the most frequent 5,000 words: the 2,000-level, 3,000-level, 4,000-level, and the 5,000-level. The two tests aimed to address some of the limitations of tests currently in use. First, they are sampled from recent frequency lists. Second, they are geared towards Dutch-speaking learners of English and French in Flanders. Third, they attempt to minimize guessing by including an “I don’t know”-option. The findings showed that the tests are internally consistent. Mean scores decreased when the words were less frequent, lending evidence to the tests’ construct validity. Additionally, the tests seem to be able to discriminate between different proficiency levels. As both tests were developed according to the same principles, they can be used to compare learners’ English and French vocabulary knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics (Belgium)
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics (Belgium) Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信