印度潜在能源基础设施和政策措施对气候和空气污染的影响

IF 5.8 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Brinda Yarlagadda , Steven J. Smith , Bryan K. Mignone , Dharik Mallapragada , Cynthia A. Randles , Jon Sampedro
{"title":"印度潜在能源基础设施和政策措施对气候和空气污染的影响","authors":"Brinda Yarlagadda ,&nbsp;Steven J. Smith ,&nbsp;Bryan K. Mignone ,&nbsp;Dharik Mallapragada ,&nbsp;Cynthia A. Randles ,&nbsp;Jon Sampedro","doi":"10.1016/j.egycc.2021.100067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>India is a rapidly developing economy with interrelated air quality, sustainable development, and climate change mitigation goals. There are unique challenges to achieving each of these goals as well as potential tradeoffs among them. This study examines the implications of possible future energy, climate, and air pollution control policies and measures in India through 2050. We take a scenario approach using the GCAM global energy-climate-land model combined with the Hector simple climate model and the TM5-FASST air quality source-receptor model to examine energy, climate and air quality outcomes. Reducing use of traditional biomass in buildings can reduce primary carbonaceous particulate emissions well below 2015 levels. However, policies that are more ambitious than current plans would likely be required to reduce SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions well below 2015 levels. Among single policy cases considered, pricing of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and expansion of natural gas infrastructure have the largest impacts on overall energy system changes relative to the reference scenario. Ambitious air pollution control and GHG policies lead to the largest reductions in air pollution concentrations and radiative forcing, respectively. However, ambitious air pollution control and GHG policies differ in the extent to which they support or impede other policy objectives. Forcing increases due to reduced aerosols from ambitious air pollution policies can be mitigated, at least in part, by applying air pollution control and GHG policies together.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72914,"journal":{"name":"Energy and climate change","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100067"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278721000441/pdfft?md5=f2e2c1e0e1564bd7644ec1b96271959a&pid=1-s2.0-S2666278721000441-main.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Climate and air pollution implications of potential energy infrastructure and policy measures in India\",\"authors\":\"Brinda Yarlagadda ,&nbsp;Steven J. Smith ,&nbsp;Bryan K. Mignone ,&nbsp;Dharik Mallapragada ,&nbsp;Cynthia A. Randles ,&nbsp;Jon Sampedro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.egycc.2021.100067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>India is a rapidly developing economy with interrelated air quality, sustainable development, and climate change mitigation goals. There are unique challenges to achieving each of these goals as well as potential tradeoffs among them. This study examines the implications of possible future energy, climate, and air pollution control policies and measures in India through 2050. We take a scenario approach using the GCAM global energy-climate-land model combined with the Hector simple climate model and the TM5-FASST air quality source-receptor model to examine energy, climate and air quality outcomes. Reducing use of traditional biomass in buildings can reduce primary carbonaceous particulate emissions well below 2015 levels. However, policies that are more ambitious than current plans would likely be required to reduce SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions well below 2015 levels. Among single policy cases considered, pricing of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and expansion of natural gas infrastructure have the largest impacts on overall energy system changes relative to the reference scenario. Ambitious air pollution control and GHG policies lead to the largest reductions in air pollution concentrations and radiative forcing, respectively. However, ambitious air pollution control and GHG policies differ in the extent to which they support or impede other policy objectives. Forcing increases due to reduced aerosols from ambitious air pollution policies can be mitigated, at least in part, by applying air pollution control and GHG policies together.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy and climate change\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100067\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278721000441/pdfft?md5=f2e2c1e0e1564bd7644ec1b96271959a&pid=1-s2.0-S2666278721000441-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy and climate change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278721000441\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and climate change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278721000441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

印度是一个快速发展的经济体,其空气质量、可持续发展和减缓气候变化的目标相互关联。实现每一个目标都面临着独特的挑战,同时也存在着潜在的权衡。本研究探讨了到2050年印度可能的未来能源、气候和空气污染控制政策和措施的影响。我们采用情景方法,利用GCAM全球能源-气候-陆地模型结合Hector简单气候模型和tm5 - fast空气质量源-受体模型来检验能源、气候和空气质量结果。减少建筑物中传统生物质的使用可以将初级碳颗粒排放量减少到远低于2015年的水平。然而,要将二氧化硫和氮氧化物的排放量减少到远低于2015年的水平,可能需要出台比目前计划更雄心勃勃的政策。在考虑的单一政策案例中,相对于参考情景,温室气体(GHG)排放定价和天然气基础设施扩张对整体能源系统变化的影响最大。雄心勃勃的空气污染控制和温室气体政策分别导致空气污染浓度和辐射强迫的最大降幅。然而,雄心勃勃的空气污染控制和温室气体政策在支持或阻碍其他政策目标的程度上有所不同。通过同时实施空气污染控制和温室气体政策,可以至少部分地减轻雄心勃勃的空气污染政策导致的气溶胶减少所造成的强迫增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Climate and air pollution implications of potential energy infrastructure and policy measures in India

India is a rapidly developing economy with interrelated air quality, sustainable development, and climate change mitigation goals. There are unique challenges to achieving each of these goals as well as potential tradeoffs among them. This study examines the implications of possible future energy, climate, and air pollution control policies and measures in India through 2050. We take a scenario approach using the GCAM global energy-climate-land model combined with the Hector simple climate model and the TM5-FASST air quality source-receptor model to examine energy, climate and air quality outcomes. Reducing use of traditional biomass in buildings can reduce primary carbonaceous particulate emissions well below 2015 levels. However, policies that are more ambitious than current plans would likely be required to reduce SO2 and NOx emissions well below 2015 levels. Among single policy cases considered, pricing of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and expansion of natural gas infrastructure have the largest impacts on overall energy system changes relative to the reference scenario. Ambitious air pollution control and GHG policies lead to the largest reductions in air pollution concentrations and radiative forcing, respectively. However, ambitious air pollution control and GHG policies differ in the extent to which they support or impede other policy objectives. Forcing increases due to reduced aerosols from ambitious air pollution policies can be mitigated, at least in part, by applying air pollution control and GHG policies together.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and climate change
Energy and climate change Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信