探索教师整合技术的意愿:在线教学与AR/ vr教学的比较

IF 3.4 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yujung Ko, W. Shin
{"title":"探索教师整合技术的意愿:在线教学与AR/ vr教学的比较","authors":"Yujung Ko, W. Shin","doi":"10.1080/1475939X.2023.2237037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The present study compared teachers’ acceptance of online and augmented reality (AR)/virtual reality (VR) technology in instruction, employing an extended technology acceptance model (eTAM). The authors included four influencing factors for teachers’ technology integration (teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge [TPACK], self-efficacy, constructivist beliefs and motivational support) and investigated their impact on teachers’ acceptance of online- and AR/VR-based instruction. The results confirmed that self-efficacy and motivational support impacted perceived ease of use for both technologies. The most salient difference when comparing influencing factors was that constructivist beliefs influenced perceived usefulness in online-based instruction, whereas TPACK did in AR/VR-based instruction.","PeriodicalId":46992,"journal":{"name":"Technology Pedagogy and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring teachers’ intention to integrate technology: a comparison between online- and AR/VR-based instruction\",\"authors\":\"Yujung Ko, W. Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1475939X.2023.2237037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The present study compared teachers’ acceptance of online and augmented reality (AR)/virtual reality (VR) technology in instruction, employing an extended technology acceptance model (eTAM). The authors included four influencing factors for teachers’ technology integration (teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge [TPACK], self-efficacy, constructivist beliefs and motivational support) and investigated their impact on teachers’ acceptance of online- and AR/VR-based instruction. The results confirmed that self-efficacy and motivational support impacted perceived ease of use for both technologies. The most salient difference when comparing influencing factors was that constructivist beliefs influenced perceived usefulness in online-based instruction, whereas TPACK did in AR/VR-based instruction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology Pedagogy and Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology Pedagogy and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2023.2237037\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology Pedagogy and Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2023.2237037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用扩展技术接受模型(eTAM),比较了教师在教学中对在线和增强现实(AR)/虚拟现实(VR)技术的接受程度。作者将教师技术整合的四个影响因素(教师的技术教学和内容知识[TPACK]、自我效能感、建构主义信念和动机支持)纳入研究,并调查了它们对教师接受基于在线和AR/ vr的教学的影响。结果证实,自我效能感和动机支持影响两种技术的感知易用性。在比较影响因素时,最显著的差异是建构主义信念影响在线教学的感知有用性,而TPACK影响AR/ vr教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring teachers’ intention to integrate technology: a comparison between online- and AR/VR-based instruction
ABSTRACT The present study compared teachers’ acceptance of online and augmented reality (AR)/virtual reality (VR) technology in instruction, employing an extended technology acceptance model (eTAM). The authors included four influencing factors for teachers’ technology integration (teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge [TPACK], self-efficacy, constructivist beliefs and motivational support) and investigated their impact on teachers’ acceptance of online- and AR/VR-based instruction. The results confirmed that self-efficacy and motivational support impacted perceived ease of use for both technologies. The most salient difference when comparing influencing factors was that constructivist beliefs influenced perceived usefulness in online-based instruction, whereas TPACK did in AR/VR-based instruction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technology Pedagogy and Education
Technology Pedagogy and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信