观察STEM课堂的包容性:有和没有智力和发育障碍的学生的学术和社会参与

Emily M. Kuntz, E. Carter, Kaitlyn Cassady, Victoria F. Knight
{"title":"观察STEM课堂的包容性:有和没有智力和发育障碍的学生的学术和社会参与","authors":"Emily M. Kuntz, E. Carter, Kaitlyn Cassady, Victoria F. Knight","doi":"10.1352/2326-6988-10.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Calls to support inclusive educational experiences for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) have been longstanding. General education STEM classes may provide a rich context for promoting the inclusion of these students within a relevant curricular area. To assess inclusive class participation, we directly observed 15 secondary students with IDD—along with a comparison group of their classmates without disabilities—in STEM-related classes. We focused on academic, social, and contextual measures. Although some similarities were found in the academic and social participation of students and their classmates, key differences were observed in the areas of what they learned, who they conversed with, and how they learned. We present recommendations for future research and practice aimed at strengthening inclusive educational experiences.","PeriodicalId":93183,"journal":{"name":"Inclusion (Washington, D.C.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observing Inclusion in STEM Classes: Academic and Social Participation of Students With and Without Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities\",\"authors\":\"Emily M. Kuntz, E. Carter, Kaitlyn Cassady, Victoria F. Knight\",\"doi\":\"10.1352/2326-6988-10.1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Calls to support inclusive educational experiences for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) have been longstanding. General education STEM classes may provide a rich context for promoting the inclusion of these students within a relevant curricular area. To assess inclusive class participation, we directly observed 15 secondary students with IDD—along with a comparison group of their classmates without disabilities—in STEM-related classes. We focused on academic, social, and contextual measures. Although some similarities were found in the academic and social participation of students and their classmates, key differences were observed in the areas of what they learned, who they conversed with, and how they learned. We present recommendations for future research and practice aimed at strengthening inclusive educational experiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inclusion (Washington, D.C.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inclusion (Washington, D.C.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-10.1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inclusion (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-10.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

长期以来,人们一直呼吁为智力和发育障碍学生提供包容性教育。通识教育STEM课程可以为促进这些学生融入相关课程领域提供丰富的背景。为了评估包容性课堂参与,我们直接观察了15名患有缺乏症的中学生,以及一组没有残疾的同学,他们在stem相关课堂上进行了对比。我们关注的是学术、社会和背景方面的措施。尽管在学生和他们的同学的学术和社会参与方面发现了一些相似之处,但在他们学习的内容,他们与谁交谈以及他们如何学习等方面观察到关键的差异。我们对未来的研究和实践提出了建议,旨在加强包容性教育经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Observing Inclusion in STEM Classes: Academic and Social Participation of Students With and Without Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
Calls to support inclusive educational experiences for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) have been longstanding. General education STEM classes may provide a rich context for promoting the inclusion of these students within a relevant curricular area. To assess inclusive class participation, we directly observed 15 secondary students with IDD—along with a comparison group of their classmates without disabilities—in STEM-related classes. We focused on academic, social, and contextual measures. Although some similarities were found in the academic and social participation of students and their classmates, key differences were observed in the areas of what they learned, who they conversed with, and how they learned. We present recommendations for future research and practice aimed at strengthening inclusive educational experiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信