探索CMMN在知识密集型过程建模中的适用性:建模师的经验评估

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Ioannis Routis, Cleopatra Bardaki, Mara Nikolaidou, Georgia Dede, Dimosthenis Anagnostopoulos
{"title":"探索CMMN在知识密集型过程建模中的适用性:建模师的经验评估","authors":"Ioannis Routis,&nbsp;Cleopatra Bardaki,&nbsp;Mara Nikolaidou,&nbsp;Georgia Dede,&nbsp;Dimosthenis Anagnostopoulos","doi":"10.1002/kpm.1738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Knowledge-intensive processes (KiPs) have emerged characterizing tasks that are data-driven, change dynamically and depend on the knowledge and experience of knowledge workers. Case Management Model and Notation (CMMN) language was introduced for modeling unstructured, agile human-centric processes. As the available Business Process Modeling (BPM) methods and practices are not adequate for modeling KiPs, this paper presents an empirical study of the applicability of CMMN to modeling KiPs. After experienced modelers designed the models of three KiPs scenarios utilizing CMMN, their perceptions were collected assessing the support of CMMN to the KiPs characteristics. Specifically, the modelers assessed the support of the newly introduced CMMN notation elements to the KiPs characteristics. Three of them, that is, knowledge-driven, unpredictable, and goal-oriented, were highlighted as the ones that get the greater support by CMMN when it comes to modeling KiPs; the participating modelers suggested that the applicability of CMMN to modeling KiPs is mostly reinforced by the Sentries element. Considering that in a knowledge-driven economy, organizations are called to transform their way of thinking and manage KiPs, we value the modelers' opinions since they shall apply such practices in the future. This research is a first step to assess whether CMMN may be a “fit” for modeling KiPs. When considering the potential of CMMN for KiPs modeling, the perceptions of such real CMMN users are also first indications of the CMMN future in terms of application.</p>","PeriodicalId":46428,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge and Process Management","volume":"30 1","pages":"33-54"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring CMMN applicability to knowledge-intensive process modeling: An empirical evaluation by modelers\",\"authors\":\"Ioannis Routis,&nbsp;Cleopatra Bardaki,&nbsp;Mara Nikolaidou,&nbsp;Georgia Dede,&nbsp;Dimosthenis Anagnostopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/kpm.1738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Knowledge-intensive processes (KiPs) have emerged characterizing tasks that are data-driven, change dynamically and depend on the knowledge and experience of knowledge workers. Case Management Model and Notation (CMMN) language was introduced for modeling unstructured, agile human-centric processes. As the available Business Process Modeling (BPM) methods and practices are not adequate for modeling KiPs, this paper presents an empirical study of the applicability of CMMN to modeling KiPs. After experienced modelers designed the models of three KiPs scenarios utilizing CMMN, their perceptions were collected assessing the support of CMMN to the KiPs characteristics. Specifically, the modelers assessed the support of the newly introduced CMMN notation elements to the KiPs characteristics. Three of them, that is, knowledge-driven, unpredictable, and goal-oriented, were highlighted as the ones that get the greater support by CMMN when it comes to modeling KiPs; the participating modelers suggested that the applicability of CMMN to modeling KiPs is mostly reinforced by the Sentries element. Considering that in a knowledge-driven economy, organizations are called to transform their way of thinking and manage KiPs, we value the modelers' opinions since they shall apply such practices in the future. This research is a first step to assess whether CMMN may be a “fit” for modeling KiPs. When considering the potential of CMMN for KiPs modeling, the perceptions of such real CMMN users are also first indications of the CMMN future in terms of application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knowledge and Process Management\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"33-54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knowledge and Process Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/kpm.1738\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge and Process Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/kpm.1738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

知识密集型过程(KiPs)已经出现,其特征是数据驱动的、动态变化的、依赖于知识工作者的知识和经验的任务。引入了案例管理模型和符号(CMMN)语言,用于对非结构化的、敏捷的以人为中心的流程进行建模。由于现有的业务流程建模(BPM)方法和实践不足以对kip进行建模,本文对CMMN在kip建模中的适用性进行了实证研究。经验丰富的建模者利用CMMN设计了三个KiPs情景的模型后,收集了他们的看法,评估了CMMN对KiPs特征的支持。具体来说,建模者评估了新引入的CMMN符号元素对KiPs特征的支持。其中,知识驱动型、不可预测型和目标导向型是CMMN在kip建模中最支持的三种模式;参与的建模者认为CMMN对kip建模的适用性主要是通过Sentries元素来增强的。考虑到在知识驱动的经济中,组织被要求转变他们的思维方式和管理知识产权,我们重视建模者的意见,因为他们将在未来应用这些实践。这项研究是评估CMMN是否“适合”建模kip的第一步。在考虑CMMN对KiPs建模的潜力时,这些真正的CMMN用户的感知也是CMMN在应用方面的未来的第一个迹象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring CMMN applicability to knowledge-intensive process modeling: An empirical evaluation by modelers

Knowledge-intensive processes (KiPs) have emerged characterizing tasks that are data-driven, change dynamically and depend on the knowledge and experience of knowledge workers. Case Management Model and Notation (CMMN) language was introduced for modeling unstructured, agile human-centric processes. As the available Business Process Modeling (BPM) methods and practices are not adequate for modeling KiPs, this paper presents an empirical study of the applicability of CMMN to modeling KiPs. After experienced modelers designed the models of three KiPs scenarios utilizing CMMN, their perceptions were collected assessing the support of CMMN to the KiPs characteristics. Specifically, the modelers assessed the support of the newly introduced CMMN notation elements to the KiPs characteristics. Three of them, that is, knowledge-driven, unpredictable, and goal-oriented, were highlighted as the ones that get the greater support by CMMN when it comes to modeling KiPs; the participating modelers suggested that the applicability of CMMN to modeling KiPs is mostly reinforced by the Sentries element. Considering that in a knowledge-driven economy, organizations are called to transform their way of thinking and manage KiPs, we value the modelers' opinions since they shall apply such practices in the future. This research is a first step to assess whether CMMN may be a “fit” for modeling KiPs. When considering the potential of CMMN for KiPs modeling, the perceptions of such real CMMN users are also first indications of the CMMN future in terms of application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
16.20%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Knowledge and Process Management aims to provide essential information to executives responsible for driving performance improvement in their business or for introducing new ideas to business through thought leadership. The journal meets executives" needs for practical information on the lessons learned from other organizations in the areas of: - knowledge management - organizational learning - core competences - process management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信