自我报告的恐惧、心理僵化和阿片类药物剂量与疼痛的关系

Brandon Scott, T. Virden, Krista Perdue
{"title":"自我报告的恐惧、心理僵化和阿片类药物剂量与疼痛的关系","authors":"Brandon Scott, T. Virden, Krista Perdue","doi":"10.11648/J.PBS.20211005.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the past two decades, research on the treatment of chronic pain with opioid medication has attempted to understand the complex relationship between psychological factors, subjective pain experience, and prescription opioid use. Specifically, fear and psychological inflexibility factors have been explored in relation to both pain sensation and opioid dose. The current study aims to explore and enhance the understandings of brief, subjective self-report measures of fear in relation to opioid dose, subjective fear, self-reported pain, and psychological inflexibility processes. This study examined whether (1) a quadratic relationship would exist between pain scores and opioid dose; (2) individuals with higher opioid dosages would have higher psychological inflexibility scores and subjective fear of pain scores; (3) subjective fear scores, in concert with psychological inflexibility pain measures, would be predictive of pain scores, and (4) subjective fear scores would positively correlate to psychological inflexibility pain measures. The final sample consisted of 202 respondents of an online survey for chronic pain. Survey measures included the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire (CPG), the Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS), Subjective Fear of Pain when in Low Pain (FlowP), and when in No Pain (FnoP). Opioid dosage for each participant was converted to the standardized Morphine Milligram Equivalent (MME). A significant quadratic relationship between the CPG and MME was found (p=0.016). MME scores were ns in relation to Subjective Fear of Pain scores or PIPS. FlowP and FnoP, however, did predict overall pain scores for participants (p<0.001). Overall pain scores also showed a positive moderate relationship with overall PIPS scores (r(200)=0.673, p<0.001). FlowP and PIPS together explained 45.7% of the variance of pain scores (F(2,199) = 83.640, p=0.003, R=0.676, R2=0.457) with FnoP and PIPS explaining slightly less at 44.8% (F(2,187)=76.002, p<0.001, R=0.670, R2=0.448). FlowP, however, showed slightly stronger correlations to overall PIPS scores (r(200)=0.648, p<0.001) when compared to FnoP (r(188)=0.589, p<0.001). These findings support previous research indicating a quadratic relationship between pain and opioid dose. Higher pain scores were correlated to higher scores on PIPS and subjective fear of pain questions. Of benefit, the subjective fear of pain questions showed some minor predictability when used as a two-question predictor of pain. Our results not only support previous research underlying the relationship between opioid dose and pain but expand on insight into the use of short-form, fear-related questions to predict psychometrics such as psychological inflexibility and pain sensation.","PeriodicalId":93047,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and behavioral sciences (New York, N.Y. 2012)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-reported Fear, Psychological Inflexibility and Opioid Dose in Relation to Pain\",\"authors\":\"Brandon Scott, T. Virden, Krista Perdue\",\"doi\":\"10.11648/J.PBS.20211005.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Within the past two decades, research on the treatment of chronic pain with opioid medication has attempted to understand the complex relationship between psychological factors, subjective pain experience, and prescription opioid use. Specifically, fear and psychological inflexibility factors have been explored in relation to both pain sensation and opioid dose. The current study aims to explore and enhance the understandings of brief, subjective self-report measures of fear in relation to opioid dose, subjective fear, self-reported pain, and psychological inflexibility processes. This study examined whether (1) a quadratic relationship would exist between pain scores and opioid dose; (2) individuals with higher opioid dosages would have higher psychological inflexibility scores and subjective fear of pain scores; (3) subjective fear scores, in concert with psychological inflexibility pain measures, would be predictive of pain scores, and (4) subjective fear scores would positively correlate to psychological inflexibility pain measures. The final sample consisted of 202 respondents of an online survey for chronic pain. Survey measures included the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire (CPG), the Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS), Subjective Fear of Pain when in Low Pain (FlowP), and when in No Pain (FnoP). Opioid dosage for each participant was converted to the standardized Morphine Milligram Equivalent (MME). A significant quadratic relationship between the CPG and MME was found (p=0.016). MME scores were ns in relation to Subjective Fear of Pain scores or PIPS. FlowP and FnoP, however, did predict overall pain scores for participants (p<0.001). Overall pain scores also showed a positive moderate relationship with overall PIPS scores (r(200)=0.673, p<0.001). FlowP and PIPS together explained 45.7% of the variance of pain scores (F(2,199) = 83.640, p=0.003, R=0.676, R2=0.457) with FnoP and PIPS explaining slightly less at 44.8% (F(2,187)=76.002, p<0.001, R=0.670, R2=0.448). FlowP, however, showed slightly stronger correlations to overall PIPS scores (r(200)=0.648, p<0.001) when compared to FnoP (r(188)=0.589, p<0.001). These findings support previous research indicating a quadratic relationship between pain and opioid dose. Higher pain scores were correlated to higher scores on PIPS and subjective fear of pain questions. Of benefit, the subjective fear of pain questions showed some minor predictability when used as a two-question predictor of pain. Our results not only support previous research underlying the relationship between opioid dose and pain but expand on insight into the use of short-form, fear-related questions to predict psychometrics such as psychological inflexibility and pain sensation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology and behavioral sciences (New York, N.Y. 2012)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology and behavioral sciences (New York, N.Y. 2012)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.PBS.20211005.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and behavioral sciences (New York, N.Y. 2012)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.PBS.20211005.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的二十年中,阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛的研究试图了解心理因素、主观疼痛体验和处方阿片类药物使用之间的复杂关系。具体而言,恐惧和心理不灵活性因素已被探索与疼痛感觉和阿片类药物剂量的关系。本研究旨在探索和加强对阿片类药物剂量、主观恐惧、自我报告疼痛和心理不灵活性过程中恐惧的简短、主观自我报告测量的理解。本研究考察了(1)疼痛评分与阿片类药物剂量之间是否存在二次关系;(2)阿片类药物剂量越大,个体的心理不灵活性评分和主观疼痛恐惧评分越高;(3)主观恐惧得分与心理不灵活性疼痛测量具有显著的预测作用;(4)主观恐惧得分与心理不灵活性疼痛测量具有显著的正相关。最后的样本包括202名慢性疼痛在线调查的受访者。调查方法包括慢性疼痛等级问卷(CPG)、疼痛心理不灵活性量表(PIPS)、低痛时的疼痛主观恐惧(FlowP)和无痛时的疼痛主观恐惧(FnoP)。每个参与者的阿片类药物剂量被转换为标准化吗啡毫克当量(MME)。CPG与MME呈显著的二次关系(p=0.016)。MME评分与主观疼痛恐惧评分(PIPS)的关系为ns。然而,FlowP和FnoP确实预测了参与者的总体疼痛评分(p<0.001)。总体疼痛评分与总体PIPS评分也呈中等正相关(r(200)=0.673, p<0.001)。FlowP和PIPS共同解释45.7%的疼痛评分方差(F(2199)= 83.640, p=0.003, R=0.676, R2=0.457), FnoP和PIPS共同解释44.8%的疼痛评分方差(F(2187)=76.002, p<0.001, R=0.670, R2=0.448)。然而,与FnoP (r(188)=0.589, p<0.001)相比,FlowP与总体PIPS评分的相关性略强(r(200)=0.648, p<0.001)。这些发现支持了先前的研究,表明疼痛和阿片类药物剂量之间存在二次关系。较高的疼痛得分与较高的PIPS和主观疼痛恐惧问题得分相关。有益的是,当作为两个问题的疼痛预测器时,主观的疼痛恐惧问题显示出一些轻微的可预测性。我们的结果不仅支持了先前关于阿片类药物剂量与疼痛之间关系的研究,而且扩展了对使用简短的、与恐惧相关的问题来预测心理测量学(如心理不灵活性和疼痛感觉)的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-reported Fear, Psychological Inflexibility and Opioid Dose in Relation to Pain
Within the past two decades, research on the treatment of chronic pain with opioid medication has attempted to understand the complex relationship between psychological factors, subjective pain experience, and prescription opioid use. Specifically, fear and psychological inflexibility factors have been explored in relation to both pain sensation and opioid dose. The current study aims to explore and enhance the understandings of brief, subjective self-report measures of fear in relation to opioid dose, subjective fear, self-reported pain, and psychological inflexibility processes. This study examined whether (1) a quadratic relationship would exist between pain scores and opioid dose; (2) individuals with higher opioid dosages would have higher psychological inflexibility scores and subjective fear of pain scores; (3) subjective fear scores, in concert with psychological inflexibility pain measures, would be predictive of pain scores, and (4) subjective fear scores would positively correlate to psychological inflexibility pain measures. The final sample consisted of 202 respondents of an online survey for chronic pain. Survey measures included the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire (CPG), the Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS), Subjective Fear of Pain when in Low Pain (FlowP), and when in No Pain (FnoP). Opioid dosage for each participant was converted to the standardized Morphine Milligram Equivalent (MME). A significant quadratic relationship between the CPG and MME was found (p=0.016). MME scores were ns in relation to Subjective Fear of Pain scores or PIPS. FlowP and FnoP, however, did predict overall pain scores for participants (p<0.001). Overall pain scores also showed a positive moderate relationship with overall PIPS scores (r(200)=0.673, p<0.001). FlowP and PIPS together explained 45.7% of the variance of pain scores (F(2,199) = 83.640, p=0.003, R=0.676, R2=0.457) with FnoP and PIPS explaining slightly less at 44.8% (F(2,187)=76.002, p<0.001, R=0.670, R2=0.448). FlowP, however, showed slightly stronger correlations to overall PIPS scores (r(200)=0.648, p<0.001) when compared to FnoP (r(188)=0.589, p<0.001). These findings support previous research indicating a quadratic relationship between pain and opioid dose. Higher pain scores were correlated to higher scores on PIPS and subjective fear of pain questions. Of benefit, the subjective fear of pain questions showed some minor predictability when used as a two-question predictor of pain. Our results not only support previous research underlying the relationship between opioid dose and pain but expand on insight into the use of short-form, fear-related questions to predict psychometrics such as psychological inflexibility and pain sensation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信