{"title":"Scopus或Web of Science为尼日利亚一所大学的药学研究提供文献计量资料","authors":"N. Boshoff, M. Akanmu","doi":"10.7553/83-2-1682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous comparisons between Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) paid little attention to universities in African countries. This study investigated the effect of using different data sources on the bibliometric profile of Obafemi Awolowo University in Nigeria, focusing on the Faculty of Pharmacy for the period 1990-2013. In addition to data from Scopus and WoS, the analysis included articles from the curriculum vitae (CVs) of the faculty staff. The combined dataset (Scopus, WoS and CV data) provided answers to the central question: What differences can be observed in the bibliometric profile of research when comparing the Scopus and WoS output to the total article output? Although Scopus and WoS differed in size, the results of each showed a similar pattern. Notable differences were found with regard to indicators of research collaboration. WoS in particular appeared to be biased towards international collaboration. Additional sources of articles (beyond WoS and Scopus) are required to assess adequately research performance at faculty level for a university in a developing country. The quality aspect of those additional sources cannot be ignored.","PeriodicalId":43496,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scopus or Web of Science for a bibliometric profile of pharmacy research at a Nigerian university\",\"authors\":\"N. Boshoff, M. Akanmu\",\"doi\":\"10.7553/83-2-1682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Previous comparisons between Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) paid little attention to universities in African countries. This study investigated the effect of using different data sources on the bibliometric profile of Obafemi Awolowo University in Nigeria, focusing on the Faculty of Pharmacy for the period 1990-2013. In addition to data from Scopus and WoS, the analysis included articles from the curriculum vitae (CVs) of the faculty staff. The combined dataset (Scopus, WoS and CV data) provided answers to the central question: What differences can be observed in the bibliometric profile of research when comparing the Scopus and WoS output to the total article output? Although Scopus and WoS differed in size, the results of each showed a similar pattern. Notable differences were found with regard to indicators of research collaboration. WoS in particular appeared to be biased towards international collaboration. Additional sources of articles (beyond WoS and Scopus) are required to assess adequately research performance at faculty level for a university in a developing country. The quality aspect of those additional sources cannot be ignored.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7553/83-2-1682\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7553/83-2-1682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21
摘要
以前对Scopus和Web of Science (WoS)的比较很少关注非洲国家的大学。本研究调查了使用不同数据源对尼日利亚Obafemi Awolowo大学文献计量学概况的影响,重点研究了1990-2013年期间药学院的文献计量学概况。除了来自Scopus和WoS的数据外,分析还包括教职员工简历(cv)中的文章。综合数据集(Scopus, WoS和CV数据)提供了核心问题的答案:当将Scopus和WoS输出与总文章输出进行比较时,可以观察到研究的文献计量学特征有什么差异?虽然Scopus和WoS的大小不同,但结果都显示出相似的模式。在研究合作指标方面发现了显著差异。世界卫生组织尤其倾向于国际合作。发展中国家的一所大学需要更多的文章来源(除了WoS和Scopus)来充分评估教师水平的研究绩效。这些额外来源的质量方面不容忽视。
Scopus or Web of Science for a bibliometric profile of pharmacy research at a Nigerian university
Previous comparisons between Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) paid little attention to universities in African countries. This study investigated the effect of using different data sources on the bibliometric profile of Obafemi Awolowo University in Nigeria, focusing on the Faculty of Pharmacy for the period 1990-2013. In addition to data from Scopus and WoS, the analysis included articles from the curriculum vitae (CVs) of the faculty staff. The combined dataset (Scopus, WoS and CV data) provided answers to the central question: What differences can be observed in the bibliometric profile of research when comparing the Scopus and WoS output to the total article output? Although Scopus and WoS differed in size, the results of each showed a similar pattern. Notable differences were found with regard to indicators of research collaboration. WoS in particular appeared to be biased towards international collaboration. Additional sources of articles (beyond WoS and Scopus) are required to assess adequately research performance at faculty level for a university in a developing country. The quality aspect of those additional sources cannot be ignored.