砖作为论据

Pub Date : 2021-12-14 DOI:10.1075/jaic.20012.con
Sarah J. Constant
{"title":"砖作为论据","authors":"Sarah J. Constant","doi":"10.1075/jaic.20012.con","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study applies Leo Groarke’s (2019) ART approach and KC (Key Component) table\n method to social housing buildings designed by a significant Dutch architectural movement during the early twentieth century – the so-called Amsterdam\n School. Unlike members of other contemporary architectural movements, architects of the Amsterdam School seldom wrote about their theories\n or beliefs, leaving very little evidence about their feelings and attitudes apart from the architectural forms they constructed. The\n expressive designs of Amsterdam School social housing buildings Het Schip and De Dageraad present\n promising opportunities for theoretical reflection on architecture as a form of embodied visual and multimodal argumentation (‘bricks as\n arguments’), however, other theoretical tools may be necessary to supplement the ART approach in order to fashion a critical method\n capable of apprehending the full scope of argumentation in the complex and rich Dutch polylogue.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bricks as arguments\",\"authors\":\"Sarah J. Constant\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jaic.20012.con\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study applies Leo Groarke’s (2019) ART approach and KC (Key Component) table\\n method to social housing buildings designed by a significant Dutch architectural movement during the early twentieth century – the so-called Amsterdam\\n School. Unlike members of other contemporary architectural movements, architects of the Amsterdam School seldom wrote about their theories\\n or beliefs, leaving very little evidence about their feelings and attitudes apart from the architectural forms they constructed. The\\n expressive designs of Amsterdam School social housing buildings Het Schip and De Dageraad present\\n promising opportunities for theoretical reflection on architecture as a form of embodied visual and multimodal argumentation (‘bricks as\\n arguments’), however, other theoretical tools may be necessary to supplement the ART approach in order to fashion a critical method\\n capable of apprehending the full scope of argumentation in the complex and rich Dutch polylogue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20012.con\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20012.con","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究将Leo Groarke(2019)的ART方法和KC(关键成分)表方法应用于20世纪初荷兰重要建筑运动——所谓的阿姆斯特丹学派——设计的社会住房建筑。与其他当代建筑运动的成员不同,阿姆斯特丹学派的建筑师很少写他们的理论或信仰,除了他们建造的建筑形式外,几乎没有留下关于他们的感受和态度的证据。阿姆斯特丹学校社会住宅建筑Het Schip和De Dageraad的富有表现力的设计为建筑作为一种体现视觉和多模态论证的形式(“砖块作为论证”)提供了有希望的理论反思机会,然而,其他理论工具可能是必要的,以补充艺术方法,以便形成一种能够理解复杂和丰富的荷兰多元语言中论证的全部范围的关键方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Bricks as arguments
This study applies Leo Groarke’s (2019) ART approach and KC (Key Component) table method to social housing buildings designed by a significant Dutch architectural movement during the early twentieth century – the so-called Amsterdam School. Unlike members of other contemporary architectural movements, architects of the Amsterdam School seldom wrote about their theories or beliefs, leaving very little evidence about their feelings and attitudes apart from the architectural forms they constructed. The expressive designs of Amsterdam School social housing buildings Het Schip and De Dageraad present promising opportunities for theoretical reflection on architecture as a form of embodied visual and multimodal argumentation (‘bricks as arguments’), however, other theoretical tools may be necessary to supplement the ART approach in order to fashion a critical method capable of apprehending the full scope of argumentation in the complex and rich Dutch polylogue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信