走向水知识:地球上水的教学标准分析

Q1 Social Sciences
Silvia-Jessica Mostacedo-Marasovic, Brooke Colleen Mott, Holly White, C. Forbes
{"title":"走向水知识:地球上水的教学标准分析","authors":"Silvia-Jessica Mostacedo-Marasovic, Brooke Colleen Mott, Holly White, C. Forbes","doi":"10.1080/10899995.2022.2112490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Water is one of Earth’s fundamental natural systems. It is crucial to foster water literacy in today’s global citizens, particularly through formal education. The purpose of this research, in parallel with a study focused on human dimensions of water systems (Mostacedo-Marasovic et al., in press), is to examine water-related K-12 standards for teaching and learning about water and natural systems and develop a comprehensive and transdisciplinary perspective on water education. Our overarching question is, “What do disciplinary standards specify as outcomes for students’ learning about water and natural systems?” Our research questions are: (i) “To what extent do these water-related standards address recognized domains of learning?” and (ii) “What thematic outcomes for students’ learning are apparent across grades in these water-related standards?.” We use chi-square statistics and conventional qualitative content analysis complemented by processes from grounded theory to analyze water-related education standards (N = 196) from 11 education-oriented governmental and non-governmental organizations based in the United States and the United Nations. Our results indicate that, first, water-related standards emphasize the cognitive domain, including declarative and procedural knowledge, for water-related concepts and skills. The affective domain and its social component are far less prevalent. Second, the water-related standards illustrate four categories including abundance, distribution, and movement of water on Earth; water and the Geosphere; water and climate; and water and life. These findings provide a more comprehensive perspective from multiple disciplines of the natural sciences on outcomes for teaching and learning about water and natural systems, as well as the learning domains they address. These can inform educational efforts to cultivate water literacy across K-12 through teaching and learning.","PeriodicalId":35858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geoscience Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards water literacy: Analysis of standards for teaching and learning about water on Earth\",\"authors\":\"Silvia-Jessica Mostacedo-Marasovic, Brooke Colleen Mott, Holly White, C. Forbes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10899995.2022.2112490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Water is one of Earth’s fundamental natural systems. It is crucial to foster water literacy in today’s global citizens, particularly through formal education. The purpose of this research, in parallel with a study focused on human dimensions of water systems (Mostacedo-Marasovic et al., in press), is to examine water-related K-12 standards for teaching and learning about water and natural systems and develop a comprehensive and transdisciplinary perspective on water education. Our overarching question is, “What do disciplinary standards specify as outcomes for students’ learning about water and natural systems?” Our research questions are: (i) “To what extent do these water-related standards address recognized domains of learning?” and (ii) “What thematic outcomes for students’ learning are apparent across grades in these water-related standards?.” We use chi-square statistics and conventional qualitative content analysis complemented by processes from grounded theory to analyze water-related education standards (N = 196) from 11 education-oriented governmental and non-governmental organizations based in the United States and the United Nations. Our results indicate that, first, water-related standards emphasize the cognitive domain, including declarative and procedural knowledge, for water-related concepts and skills. The affective domain and its social component are far less prevalent. Second, the water-related standards illustrate four categories including abundance, distribution, and movement of water on Earth; water and the Geosphere; water and climate; and water and life. These findings provide a more comprehensive perspective from multiple disciplines of the natural sciences on outcomes for teaching and learning about water and natural systems, as well as the learning domains they address. These can inform educational efforts to cultivate water literacy across K-12 through teaching and learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geoscience Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geoscience Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2022.2112490\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geoscience Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2022.2112490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要水是地球上最基本的自然系统之一。培养当今全球公民的水知识至关重要,特别是通过正规教育。这项研究的目的,与一项专注于水系统的人类维度的研究(Mostacedo Marasovic等人,出版中)同时,是为了研究与水有关的K-12水和自然系统的教学标准,并发展一个全面的、跨学科的水教育观。我们的首要问题是,“学科标准规定学生学习水和自然系统的结果是什么?”我们的研究问题是:(i)“这些与水相关的标准在多大程度上解决了公认的学习领域?”和(ii)“在这些与水有关的标准中,学生学习的哪些主题结果在各个年级都很明显?”?。“我们使用卡方统计和传统的定性内容分析,辅以基础理论的过程来分析与水有关的教育标准(N = 196)。我们的研究结果表明,首先,与水相关的标准强调与水相关概念和技能的认知领域,包括陈述性和程序性知识。情感领域及其社会成分远没有那么普遍。第二,与水有关的标准说明了四个类别,包括地球上水的丰度、分布和运动;水和地圈;水和气候;以及水和生命。这些发现为自然科学的多个学科提供了一个更全面的视角,了解水和自然系统的教学成果,以及它们所涉及的学习领域。这些可以为教育努力提供信息,通过教学培养整个K-12的水知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards water literacy: Analysis of standards for teaching and learning about water on Earth
Abstract Water is one of Earth’s fundamental natural systems. It is crucial to foster water literacy in today’s global citizens, particularly through formal education. The purpose of this research, in parallel with a study focused on human dimensions of water systems (Mostacedo-Marasovic et al., in press), is to examine water-related K-12 standards for teaching and learning about water and natural systems and develop a comprehensive and transdisciplinary perspective on water education. Our overarching question is, “What do disciplinary standards specify as outcomes for students’ learning about water and natural systems?” Our research questions are: (i) “To what extent do these water-related standards address recognized domains of learning?” and (ii) “What thematic outcomes for students’ learning are apparent across grades in these water-related standards?.” We use chi-square statistics and conventional qualitative content analysis complemented by processes from grounded theory to analyze water-related education standards (N = 196) from 11 education-oriented governmental and non-governmental organizations based in the United States and the United Nations. Our results indicate that, first, water-related standards emphasize the cognitive domain, including declarative and procedural knowledge, for water-related concepts and skills. The affective domain and its social component are far less prevalent. Second, the water-related standards illustrate four categories including abundance, distribution, and movement of water on Earth; water and the Geosphere; water and climate; and water and life. These findings provide a more comprehensive perspective from multiple disciplines of the natural sciences on outcomes for teaching and learning about water and natural systems, as well as the learning domains they address. These can inform educational efforts to cultivate water literacy across K-12 through teaching and learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geoscience Education
Journal of Geoscience Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geoscience Education (JGE) is a peer-reviewed publication for geoscience education research, and serves as an international forum for research concerning the pedagogy, assessment, and philosophy of teaching and learning about the geosciences and related domains. JGE is a publication of the National Association of Geoscience Teachers, a non-profit, member-driven organization that supports a diverse, inclusive, and thriving community of educators and education researchers to improve teaching and learning about the Earth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信