由模型膜形成的市售脂质聚合物纳米颗粒的比较表征

IF 2.2 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Henry Sawczyc, Sabine Heit, Anthony Watts
{"title":"由模型膜形成的市售脂质聚合物纳米颗粒的比较表征","authors":"Henry Sawczyc,&nbsp;Sabine Heit,&nbsp;Anthony Watts","doi":"10.1007/s00249-023-01632-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>From the discovery of the first membrane-interacting polymer, styrene maleic-acid (SMA), there has been a rapid development of membrane solubilising polymers. These new polymers can solubilise membranes under a wide range of conditions and produce varied sizes of nanoparticles, yet there has been a lack of broad comparison between the common polymer types and solubilising conditions. Here, we present a comparative study on the three most common commercial polymers: SMA 3:1, SMA 2:1, and DIBMA. Additionally, this work presents, for the first time, a comparative characterisation of polymethacrylate copolymer (PMA). Absorbance and dynamic light scattering measurements were used to evaluate solubilisation across key buffer conditions in a simple, adaptable assay format that looked at pH, salinity, and divalent cation concentration. Lipid-polymer nanoparticles formed from SMA variants were found to be the most susceptible to buffer effects, with nanoparticles from either zwitterionic DMPC or POPC:POPG (3:1) bilayers only forming in low to moderate salinity (&lt; 600 mM NaCl) and above pH 6. DIBMA-lipid nanoparticles could be formed above a pH of 5 and were stable in up to 4 M NaCl. Similarly, PMA-lipid nanoparticles were stable in all NaCl concentrations tested (up to 4 M) and a broad pH range (3–10). However, for both DIBMA and PMA nanoparticles there is a severe penalty observed for bilayer solubilisation in non-optimal conditions or when using a charged membrane. Additionally, lipid fluidity of the DMPC-polymer nanoparticles was analysed through cw-EPR, showing no cooperative gel-fluid transition as would be expected for native-like lipid membranes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":548,"journal":{"name":"European Biophysics Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00249-023-01632-5.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative characterisation of commercially available lipid-polymer nanoparticles formed from model membranes\",\"authors\":\"Henry Sawczyc,&nbsp;Sabine Heit,&nbsp;Anthony Watts\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00249-023-01632-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>From the discovery of the first membrane-interacting polymer, styrene maleic-acid (SMA), there has been a rapid development of membrane solubilising polymers. These new polymers can solubilise membranes under a wide range of conditions and produce varied sizes of nanoparticles, yet there has been a lack of broad comparison between the common polymer types and solubilising conditions. Here, we present a comparative study on the three most common commercial polymers: SMA 3:1, SMA 2:1, and DIBMA. Additionally, this work presents, for the first time, a comparative characterisation of polymethacrylate copolymer (PMA). Absorbance and dynamic light scattering measurements were used to evaluate solubilisation across key buffer conditions in a simple, adaptable assay format that looked at pH, salinity, and divalent cation concentration. Lipid-polymer nanoparticles formed from SMA variants were found to be the most susceptible to buffer effects, with nanoparticles from either zwitterionic DMPC or POPC:POPG (3:1) bilayers only forming in low to moderate salinity (&lt; 600 mM NaCl) and above pH 6. DIBMA-lipid nanoparticles could be formed above a pH of 5 and were stable in up to 4 M NaCl. Similarly, PMA-lipid nanoparticles were stable in all NaCl concentrations tested (up to 4 M) and a broad pH range (3–10). However, for both DIBMA and PMA nanoparticles there is a severe penalty observed for bilayer solubilisation in non-optimal conditions or when using a charged membrane. Additionally, lipid fluidity of the DMPC-polymer nanoparticles was analysed through cw-EPR, showing no cooperative gel-fluid transition as would be expected for native-like lipid membranes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Biophysics Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00249-023-01632-5.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Biophysics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"2\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00249-023-01632-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Biophysics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00249-023-01632-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

自第一个膜相互作用聚合物苯乙烯马来酸(SMA)的发现以来,膜增溶聚合物得到了迅速的发展。这些新的聚合物可以在各种条件下溶解膜,并产生不同大小的纳米颗粒,然而,在常见的聚合物类型和溶解条件之间缺乏广泛的比较。在这里,我们提出了三种最常见的商业聚合物的比较研究:SMA 3:1, SMA 2:1和DIBMA。此外,这项工作首次提出了聚甲基丙烯酸酯共聚物(PMA)的比较表征。吸光度和动态光散射测量用于评估关键缓冲条件下的增溶作用,采用简单、适应性强的分析格式,观察pH、盐度和二价阳离子浓度。研究发现,由SMA变异体形成的脂质聚合物纳米颗粒最容易受到缓冲效应的影响,两性离子DMPC或POPC:POPG(3:1)双层形成的纳米颗粒仅在低至中等盐度(< 600 mM NaCl)和高于pH 6的条件下形成。dibma -脂质纳米颗粒在pH大于5的条件下可以形成,并且在高达4 M的NaCl中保持稳定。同样,pma -脂质纳米颗粒在所有测试的NaCl浓度(高达4 M)和广泛的pH范围(3-10)中都是稳定的。然而,对于DIBMA和PMA纳米粒子来说,在非最佳条件下或使用带电膜时,双分子层的增溶会受到严重的惩罚。此外,通过cw-EPR分析了dmpc -聚合物纳米颗粒的脂质流动性,显示没有天然类脂质膜所期望的凝胶-流体协同转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A comparative characterisation of commercially available lipid-polymer nanoparticles formed from model membranes

A comparative characterisation of commercially available lipid-polymer nanoparticles formed from model membranes

From the discovery of the first membrane-interacting polymer, styrene maleic-acid (SMA), there has been a rapid development of membrane solubilising polymers. These new polymers can solubilise membranes under a wide range of conditions and produce varied sizes of nanoparticles, yet there has been a lack of broad comparison between the common polymer types and solubilising conditions. Here, we present a comparative study on the three most common commercial polymers: SMA 3:1, SMA 2:1, and DIBMA. Additionally, this work presents, for the first time, a comparative characterisation of polymethacrylate copolymer (PMA). Absorbance and dynamic light scattering measurements were used to evaluate solubilisation across key buffer conditions in a simple, adaptable assay format that looked at pH, salinity, and divalent cation concentration. Lipid-polymer nanoparticles formed from SMA variants were found to be the most susceptible to buffer effects, with nanoparticles from either zwitterionic DMPC or POPC:POPG (3:1) bilayers only forming in low to moderate salinity (< 600 mM NaCl) and above pH 6. DIBMA-lipid nanoparticles could be formed above a pH of 5 and were stable in up to 4 M NaCl. Similarly, PMA-lipid nanoparticles were stable in all NaCl concentrations tested (up to 4 M) and a broad pH range (3–10). However, for both DIBMA and PMA nanoparticles there is a severe penalty observed for bilayer solubilisation in non-optimal conditions or when using a charged membrane. Additionally, lipid fluidity of the DMPC-polymer nanoparticles was analysed through cw-EPR, showing no cooperative gel-fluid transition as would be expected for native-like lipid membranes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Biophysics Journal
European Biophysics Journal 生物-生物物理
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes papers in the field of biophysics, which is defined as the study of biological phenomena by using physical methods and concepts. Original papers, reviews and Biophysics letters are published. The primary goal of this journal is to advance the understanding of biological structure and function by application of the principles of physical science, and by presenting the work in a biophysical context. Papers employing a distinctively biophysical approach at all levels of biological organisation will be considered, as will both experimental and theoretical studies. The criteria for acceptance are scientific content, originality and relevance to biological systems of current interest and importance. Principal areas of interest include: - Structure and dynamics of biological macromolecules - Membrane biophysics and ion channels - Cell biophysics and organisation - Macromolecular assemblies - Biophysical methods and instrumentation - Advanced microscopics - System dynamics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信