改编是爱德华·阿尔比《洛丽塔》中的解放

IF 0.5 2区 文学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
M. Holtz
{"title":"改编是爱德华·阿尔比《洛丽塔》中的解放","authors":"M. Holtz","doi":"10.1093/adaptation/apad022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Edward Albee’s stage adaptation (1981) of Vladimir Nabokov’s Lolita (1955) is universally regarded as an unqualified failure. This contribution seeks to recover the play from critical neglect by arguing that it not just productively interprets and transforms the source text but also critically comments on its implications regarding the relationship between artist and creation, audience and art, and ethics and aesthetics. The play features an anthropomorphised equivalent to the novel’s implied author in the character of ‘A Certain Gentleman’ (ACG), a figure uniting features of (imagined) Nabokov and Albee, who introduces himself to the audience as the creator of Humbert and guides them through the plot while commenting on the action, alternatively trying to distance himself from his creation, trying to teach him moral values, or admonishing the audience to show empathy. In the interplay of Humbert, Lolita, and ACG, the play stages an emancipatory dialogue between artist and creation, using the presentational character of (epic) theatre to level diegetic hierarchies. Just as Lolita emancipates itself from Nabokov in the act of adaptation, so Humbert emancipates himself from ACG and Lolita from Humbert. In the same way, the play encourages an emancipation on the part of the audience from a position of passive spectatorship by cultivating a critical engagement with the discordant discourses of theatrical narration, presentation, and spectatorship in a dialogic of identification and distance.","PeriodicalId":42085,"journal":{"name":"Adaptation-The Journal of Literature on Screen Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adaptation as Emancipation in Edward Albee’s Lolita\",\"authors\":\"M. Holtz\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/adaptation/apad022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Edward Albee’s stage adaptation (1981) of Vladimir Nabokov’s Lolita (1955) is universally regarded as an unqualified failure. This contribution seeks to recover the play from critical neglect by arguing that it not just productively interprets and transforms the source text but also critically comments on its implications regarding the relationship between artist and creation, audience and art, and ethics and aesthetics. The play features an anthropomorphised equivalent to the novel’s implied author in the character of ‘A Certain Gentleman’ (ACG), a figure uniting features of (imagined) Nabokov and Albee, who introduces himself to the audience as the creator of Humbert and guides them through the plot while commenting on the action, alternatively trying to distance himself from his creation, trying to teach him moral values, or admonishing the audience to show empathy. In the interplay of Humbert, Lolita, and ACG, the play stages an emancipatory dialogue between artist and creation, using the presentational character of (epic) theatre to level diegetic hierarchies. Just as Lolita emancipates itself from Nabokov in the act of adaptation, so Humbert emancipates himself from ACG and Lolita from Humbert. In the same way, the play encourages an emancipation on the part of the audience from a position of passive spectatorship by cultivating a critical engagement with the discordant discourses of theatrical narration, presentation, and spectatorship in a dialogic of identification and distance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adaptation-The Journal of Literature on Screen Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adaptation-The Journal of Literature on Screen Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/adaptation/apad022\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adaptation-The Journal of Literature on Screen Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/adaptation/apad022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

爱德华·阿尔比(Edward Albee) 1981年改编自弗拉基米尔·纳博科夫(Vladimir Nabokov)的《洛丽塔》(Lolita, 1955)的舞台剧被普遍认为是彻头彻尾的失败。这一贡献旨在通过论证它不仅富有成效地解释和转换源文本,而且还批判性地评论其关于艺术家与创作、观众与艺术、伦理与美学之间关系的含义,从而从批评忽视中恢复戏剧。这出戏的特点是拟人化的,相当于小说中隐含的作者“某绅士”(ACG)的角色,一个集纳博科夫和阿尔比(想象中的)特征于一体的人物,他向观众介绍自己是亨伯特的创造者,并在评论行动的同时引导他们完成情节,或者试图与他的创作保持距离,试图教他道德价值观,或者告诫观众表现出同情。在亨伯特、洛丽塔和ACG的相互作用中,该剧上演了一场艺术家与创作之间的解放对话,利用(史诗)戏剧的呈现性特征来消除叙事层次。正如洛丽塔在改编中从纳博科夫那里解放出来一样,亨伯特从ACG那里解放了自己,洛丽塔从亨伯特那里解放了自己。以同样的方式,该剧鼓励观众从被动观看的位置上解放出来,通过在身份和距离的对话中培养对戏剧叙事、呈现和观看的不和谐话语的批判性参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adaptation as Emancipation in Edward Albee’s Lolita
Edward Albee’s stage adaptation (1981) of Vladimir Nabokov’s Lolita (1955) is universally regarded as an unqualified failure. This contribution seeks to recover the play from critical neglect by arguing that it not just productively interprets and transforms the source text but also critically comments on its implications regarding the relationship between artist and creation, audience and art, and ethics and aesthetics. The play features an anthropomorphised equivalent to the novel’s implied author in the character of ‘A Certain Gentleman’ (ACG), a figure uniting features of (imagined) Nabokov and Albee, who introduces himself to the audience as the creator of Humbert and guides them through the plot while commenting on the action, alternatively trying to distance himself from his creation, trying to teach him moral values, or admonishing the audience to show empathy. In the interplay of Humbert, Lolita, and ACG, the play stages an emancipatory dialogue between artist and creation, using the presentational character of (epic) theatre to level diegetic hierarchies. Just as Lolita emancipates itself from Nabokov in the act of adaptation, so Humbert emancipates himself from ACG and Lolita from Humbert. In the same way, the play encourages an emancipation on the part of the audience from a position of passive spectatorship by cultivating a critical engagement with the discordant discourses of theatrical narration, presentation, and spectatorship in a dialogic of identification and distance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信