涉及麻醉科住院医师的医疗事故诉讼:国家西部法律数据库分析。

Feel G Kang, M. Kendall, J. Kang, Christopher J. Malgieri, G. D. de Oliveira
{"title":"涉及麻醉科住院医师的医疗事故诉讼:国家西部法律数据库分析。","authors":"Feel G Kang, M. Kendall, J. Kang, Christopher J. Malgieri, G. D. de Oliveira","doi":"10.46374/volxxii_issue4_deoliveira","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nMedical specialties have evaluated malpractice claims in residents, but to the best of our knowledge, malpractice claims have not been evaluated in anesthesiology residents.\n\n\nMethods\nThe Westlaw legal database was queried for all malpractice litigation cases involving anesthesiology residents in the United States from January 1959 through December 2018. The cases were divided into 2 cohorts by year (before and after 1990) to account for the differences in patient safety features and monitoring available in the different time periods.\n\n\nResults\nNinety cases were included in the analysis. The median (interquartile range) for inflation adjusted payments was $1 140 544 (0 to 4 158 589). There was no association between the year the claim was filled and the payment amount, Spearman rho = -0.17, P = 0.15. In contrast, for claims that occurred in the intraoperative period, there was a moderate negative association between the year of the claim and the inflation adjusted payment, Spearman rho = -0.45, P = 0.003. Payments were greater if the event occurred in the postoperative period, median of $4 250 000 (959 000 to 55 595 000) compared to events that happened in the intraoperative period, median of $1 039 000 (0 to 3 802 000) and preoperative periods, median of $212 000 (0 to $3 982 000), P = 0.02.\n\n\nConclusions\nThe reduction of liability across the years with malpractice claims that resulted from the intraoperative period suggest that the continued patient safety initiatives implemented by anesthesiology specialty has resulted in less liability to trainees and may stimulate future initiatives targeted to the postoperative period.","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"22 4 1","pages":"E650"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Involving Anesthesiology Residents: An Analysis of the National Westlaw Database.\",\"authors\":\"Feel G Kang, M. Kendall, J. Kang, Christopher J. Malgieri, G. D. de Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.46374/volxxii_issue4_deoliveira\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background\\nMedical specialties have evaluated malpractice claims in residents, but to the best of our knowledge, malpractice claims have not been evaluated in anesthesiology residents.\\n\\n\\nMethods\\nThe Westlaw legal database was queried for all malpractice litigation cases involving anesthesiology residents in the United States from January 1959 through December 2018. The cases were divided into 2 cohorts by year (before and after 1990) to account for the differences in patient safety features and monitoring available in the different time periods.\\n\\n\\nResults\\nNinety cases were included in the analysis. The median (interquartile range) for inflation adjusted payments was $1 140 544 (0 to 4 158 589). There was no association between the year the claim was filled and the payment amount, Spearman rho = -0.17, P = 0.15. In contrast, for claims that occurred in the intraoperative period, there was a moderate negative association between the year of the claim and the inflation adjusted payment, Spearman rho = -0.45, P = 0.003. Payments were greater if the event occurred in the postoperative period, median of $4 250 000 (959 000 to 55 595 000) compared to events that happened in the intraoperative period, median of $1 039 000 (0 to 3 802 000) and preoperative periods, median of $212 000 (0 to $3 982 000), P = 0.02.\\n\\n\\nConclusions\\nThe reduction of liability across the years with malpractice claims that resulted from the intraoperative period suggest that the continued patient safety initiatives implemented by anesthesiology specialty has resulted in less liability to trainees and may stimulate future initiatives targeted to the postoperative period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM\",\"volume\":\"22 4 1\",\"pages\":\"E650\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxii_issue4_deoliveira\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxii_issue4_deoliveira","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景医学专业对住院医师的医疗事故索赔进行了评估,但据我们所知,麻醉学住院医师尚未对医疗事故索赔做出评估。方法查询Westlaw法律数据库中1959年1月至2018年12月期间美国麻醉学住院医师的所有渎职诉讼案件。这些病例按年份(1990年前后)分为2组,以说明不同时间段患者安全特征和可用监测的差异。结果90例纳入分析。经通胀调整的付款中位数(四分位间距)为1 140 544美元(0至4 158 589美元)。索赔填写年份与付款金额之间没有关联,Spearman rho=-0.17,P=0.15。相反,对于术中发生的索赔,索赔年份与通货膨胀调整后的付款之间存在中度负相关,Spearman rho=0.45,P=0.003。如果事件发生在术后期间,则支付的金额更高,中位数为4250000美元(959000至555595000),而发生在术中期间的事件中位数为1039000美元(0至3800000),术前期间中位数为212000美元(0到39820000美元),P=0.02。结论多年来,由于术中时期造成的医疗事故索赔的责任减少表明,麻醉学专业持续实施的患者安全举措减少了受训人员的责任,并可能刺激未来针对术后时期的举措。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Involving Anesthesiology Residents: An Analysis of the National Westlaw Database.
Background Medical specialties have evaluated malpractice claims in residents, but to the best of our knowledge, malpractice claims have not been evaluated in anesthesiology residents. Methods The Westlaw legal database was queried for all malpractice litigation cases involving anesthesiology residents in the United States from January 1959 through December 2018. The cases were divided into 2 cohorts by year (before and after 1990) to account for the differences in patient safety features and monitoring available in the different time periods. Results Ninety cases were included in the analysis. The median (interquartile range) for inflation adjusted payments was $1 140 544 (0 to 4 158 589). There was no association between the year the claim was filled and the payment amount, Spearman rho = -0.17, P = 0.15. In contrast, for claims that occurred in the intraoperative period, there was a moderate negative association between the year of the claim and the inflation adjusted payment, Spearman rho = -0.45, P = 0.003. Payments were greater if the event occurred in the postoperative period, median of $4 250 000 (959 000 to 55 595 000) compared to events that happened in the intraoperative period, median of $1 039 000 (0 to 3 802 000) and preoperative periods, median of $212 000 (0 to $3 982 000), P = 0.02. Conclusions The reduction of liability across the years with malpractice claims that resulted from the intraoperative period suggest that the continued patient safety initiatives implemented by anesthesiology specialty has resulted in less liability to trainees and may stimulate future initiatives targeted to the postoperative period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信