微塑料进入淡水生态系统的径流和排放途径:系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Facets Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1139/facets-2022-0140
J. Wang, K. Bucci, P. Helm, T. Hoellein, M. J. Hoffman, R. Rooney, C. Rochman
{"title":"微塑料进入淡水生态系统的径流和排放途径:系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"J. Wang, K. Bucci, P. Helm, T. Hoellein, M. J. Hoffman, R. Rooney, C. Rochman","doi":"10.1139/facets-2022-0140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although many studies have focused on the importance of littering and (or) illegal dumping as a source of plastic pollution to freshwater, other relevant pathways should be considered, including wastewater, stormwater runoff, industrial effluent/runoff, and agricultural runoff. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis focused on these four pathways. We quantified the number of studies, amount and characteristics of microplastics reported, and the methods used to sample and measure microplastics from each pathway. Overall, we found 121 studies relevant to our criteria, published from 2014 to 2020. Of these, 54 (45%) quantified and characterized microplastics in discharge pathways. Although most focused on wastewater treatment plant effluent (85%), microplastic concentrations were highest in stormwater runoff (0.009 to 3862 particles/L). Morphologies of particles varied among pathways and sampling methods. For example, stormwater runoff was the only pathway with rubbery particles. When assessing methods, our analysis suggested that water filtered through a finer (<200 um) mesh and of a smaller volume (e.g., 6 L) captured more particles, and with a slightly greater morphological diversity. Overall, our meta-analysis suggested that all four pathways bring microplastics into freshwater ecosystems, and further research is necessary to inform the best methods for monitoring and to better understand hydrologic patterns that can inform local mitigation.","PeriodicalId":48511,"journal":{"name":"Facets","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Runoff and discharge pathways of microplastics into freshwater ecosystems: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"J. Wang, K. Bucci, P. Helm, T. Hoellein, M. J. Hoffman, R. Rooney, C. Rochman\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/facets-2022-0140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although many studies have focused on the importance of littering and (or) illegal dumping as a source of plastic pollution to freshwater, other relevant pathways should be considered, including wastewater, stormwater runoff, industrial effluent/runoff, and agricultural runoff. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis focused on these four pathways. We quantified the number of studies, amount and characteristics of microplastics reported, and the methods used to sample and measure microplastics from each pathway. Overall, we found 121 studies relevant to our criteria, published from 2014 to 2020. Of these, 54 (45%) quantified and characterized microplastics in discharge pathways. Although most focused on wastewater treatment plant effluent (85%), microplastic concentrations were highest in stormwater runoff (0.009 to 3862 particles/L). Morphologies of particles varied among pathways and sampling methods. For example, stormwater runoff was the only pathway with rubbery particles. When assessing methods, our analysis suggested that water filtered through a finer (<200 um) mesh and of a smaller volume (e.g., 6 L) captured more particles, and with a slightly greater morphological diversity. Overall, our meta-analysis suggested that all four pathways bring microplastics into freshwater ecosystems, and further research is necessary to inform the best methods for monitoring and to better understand hydrologic patterns that can inform local mitigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Facets\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Facets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2022-0140\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facets","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2022-0140","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管许多研究都集中在乱扔垃圾和(或)非法倾倒作为淡水塑料污染源的重要性上,但也应考虑其他相关途径,包括废水、雨水径流、工业废水/径流和农业径流。在这里,我们对这四种途径进行了荟萃分析。我们量化了研究的数量、报告的微塑料的数量和特性,以及用于从每个途径取样和测量微塑料的方法。总体而言,我们发现了121项与我们的标准相关的研究,这些研究发表于2014年至2020年。其中,54个(45%)对排放通道中的微塑料进行了量化和表征。尽管最关注的是污水处理厂的污水(85%),但雨水径流中的微塑料浓度最高(0.009至3862个颗粒/L)。颗粒的形态因路径和采样方法而异。例如,雨水径流是唯一有橡胶颗粒的路径。在评估方法时,我们的分析表明,通过更细(<200 um)的筛网和更小体积(例如6 L)过滤的水捕获了更多的颗粒,并且具有略大的形态多样性。总体而言,我们的荟萃分析表明,所有四种途径都将微塑料带入淡水生态系统,有必要进行进一步的研究,以确定最佳监测方法,并更好地了解水文模式,从而为当地缓解提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Runoff and discharge pathways of microplastics into freshwater ecosystems: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Although many studies have focused on the importance of littering and (or) illegal dumping as a source of plastic pollution to freshwater, other relevant pathways should be considered, including wastewater, stormwater runoff, industrial effluent/runoff, and agricultural runoff. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis focused on these four pathways. We quantified the number of studies, amount and characteristics of microplastics reported, and the methods used to sample and measure microplastics from each pathway. Overall, we found 121 studies relevant to our criteria, published from 2014 to 2020. Of these, 54 (45%) quantified and characterized microplastics in discharge pathways. Although most focused on wastewater treatment plant effluent (85%), microplastic concentrations were highest in stormwater runoff (0.009 to 3862 particles/L). Morphologies of particles varied among pathways and sampling methods. For example, stormwater runoff was the only pathway with rubbery particles. When assessing methods, our analysis suggested that water filtered through a finer (<200 um) mesh and of a smaller volume (e.g., 6 L) captured more particles, and with a slightly greater morphological diversity. Overall, our meta-analysis suggested that all four pathways bring microplastics into freshwater ecosystems, and further research is necessary to inform the best methods for monitoring and to better understand hydrologic patterns that can inform local mitigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Facets
Facets MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信