手稿中的另一个惊喜№ 索非亚国家历史博物馆24

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Spasova
{"title":"手稿中的另一个惊喜№ 索非亚国家历史博物馆24","authors":"M. Spasova","doi":"10.59076/2603-2899.2023.1.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on an excerpt from the Encomium on the Resurrection of Lazarus by Clement of Ohrid interpolated in the Old Bulgarian translation of John Chrysostom’s Εἰς τὸν τετραήμερον Λάζαρον. βʹ in its Serbian copy in ms НИМ24 from the fourteenth century. The text of the excerpt contains some archaic features at all linguistic levels. The comparative analysis of the excerpt from Clement’s Encomium on the Resurrection of Lazarus in НИМ24 and the earliest extant copy in ms F. п. I. 46 from the twelfth century reveals that the excerpt in НИМ24 has been copied from a very early antigraph. As a whole, the archaic linguistic characteristics of the excerpt in the two copies outline more clearly the archetype of the Encomium on the Resurrection of Lazarus by Clemet of Ohrid. The concrete facts reconfirm the opinion that the later copies of early antigraphs are a reliable source for the attribution of Old Bulgarian original and translated works.","PeriodicalId":52013,"journal":{"name":"Palaeobulgarica-Starobalgaristika","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Another Surprise in the Manuscript № 24 from the National Museum of History in Sofia\",\"authors\":\"M. Spasova\",\"doi\":\"10.59076/2603-2899.2023.1.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article focuses on an excerpt from the Encomium on the Resurrection of Lazarus by Clement of Ohrid interpolated in the Old Bulgarian translation of John Chrysostom’s Εἰς τὸν τετραήμερον Λάζαρον. βʹ in its Serbian copy in ms НИМ24 from the fourteenth century. The text of the excerpt contains some archaic features at all linguistic levels. The comparative analysis of the excerpt from Clement’s Encomium on the Resurrection of Lazarus in НИМ24 and the earliest extant copy in ms F. п. I. 46 from the twelfth century reveals that the excerpt in НИМ24 has been copied from a very early antigraph. As a whole, the archaic linguistic characteristics of the excerpt in the two copies outline more clearly the archetype of the Encomium on the Resurrection of Lazarus by Clemet of Ohrid. The concrete facts reconfirm the opinion that the later copies of early antigraphs are a reliable source for the attribution of Old Bulgarian original and translated works.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palaeobulgarica-Starobalgaristika\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palaeobulgarica-Starobalgaristika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59076/2603-2899.2023.1.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palaeobulgarica-Starobalgaristika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59076/2603-2899.2023.1.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章的重点是摘录自奥赫里德的克莱门特在约翰·克里索斯托姆的《拉撒路复活论》的古保加利亚译本中插入的一段节选ἰςτὸτετραήμερτ∧άζαρ。βʹ在14世纪的msНИМ24中的塞尔维亚副本中。摘录的文本包含了所有语言层面的一些古老特征。对НИМ24中克莱门特的《拉撒路复活论》摘录与F.пms中现存最早的副本的比较分析。I.来自十二世纪的46揭示了НИМ24中的摘录是从一个非常早期的古董中复制的。总的来说,这两本节选的古老语言特征更清楚地勾勒出了奥赫里德的克莱门特的《拉撒路复活论》的原型。具体的事实再次证实了这样一种观点,即早期古董的后期复制品是古保加利亚原作和翻译作品的可靠来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Another Surprise in the Manuscript № 24 from the National Museum of History in Sofia
The article focuses on an excerpt from the Encomium on the Resurrection of Lazarus by Clement of Ohrid interpolated in the Old Bulgarian translation of John Chrysostom’s Εἰς τὸν τετραήμερον Λάζαρον. βʹ in its Serbian copy in ms НИМ24 from the fourteenth century. The text of the excerpt contains some archaic features at all linguistic levels. The comparative analysis of the excerpt from Clement’s Encomium on the Resurrection of Lazarus in НИМ24 and the earliest extant copy in ms F. п. I. 46 from the twelfth century reveals that the excerpt in НИМ24 has been copied from a very early antigraph. As a whole, the archaic linguistic characteristics of the excerpt in the two copies outline more clearly the archetype of the Encomium on the Resurrection of Lazarus by Clemet of Ohrid. The concrete facts reconfirm the opinion that the later copies of early antigraphs are a reliable source for the attribution of Old Bulgarian original and translated works.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palaeobulgarica-Starobalgaristika
Palaeobulgarica-Starobalgaristika HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
75.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信