眼不见心不烦:孤独和希望在远程工作和工作参与中的作用

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Liad Bareket-Bojmel , Lily Chernyak-Hai , Malka Margalit
{"title":"眼不见心不烦:孤独和希望在远程工作和工作参与中的作用","authors":"Liad Bareket-Bojmel ,&nbsp;Lily Chernyak-Hai ,&nbsp;Malka Margalit","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2022.111955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In a world in which remote and hybrid work is becoming the new normal, the current study examines the relationship between remote work and job engagement and the roles that loneliness and hope play in this setting. Participants were 349 employees from the US and UK (170 men, 177 women, and two others), aged 21–69 (<em>M</em> = 38.8, <em>SD</em> = 9.9). The analysis identified a moderated mediation model. Among employees with low levels of loneliness, no significant relationship between remote work and job engagement was found. Remote work predicted decreased job engagement only for employees with high and moderate levels of loneliness. These results challenge the widespread assumption that remote work impairs employee engagement. Yet among employees with high levels of loneliness, hope served as a mediator between remote work and job engagement. Increasing hope may serve as an applicable intervention among lonely remote workers. Implications of our findings are discussed and interventions to increase engagement among remote and lonely employees are suggested.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 111955"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Out of sight but not out of mind: The role of loneliness and hope in remote work and in job engagement\",\"authors\":\"Liad Bareket-Bojmel ,&nbsp;Lily Chernyak-Hai ,&nbsp;Malka Margalit\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.paid.2022.111955\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In a world in which remote and hybrid work is becoming the new normal, the current study examines the relationship between remote work and job engagement and the roles that loneliness and hope play in this setting. Participants were 349 employees from the US and UK (170 men, 177 women, and two others), aged 21–69 (<em>M</em> = 38.8, <em>SD</em> = 9.9). The analysis identified a moderated mediation model. Among employees with low levels of loneliness, no significant relationship between remote work and job engagement was found. Remote work predicted decreased job engagement only for employees with high and moderate levels of loneliness. These results challenge the widespread assumption that remote work impairs employee engagement. Yet among employees with high levels of loneliness, hope served as a mediator between remote work and job engagement. Increasing hope may serve as an applicable intervention among lonely remote workers. Implications of our findings are discussed and interventions to increase engagement among remote and lonely employees are suggested.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"202 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111955\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886922004603\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886922004603","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在一个远程和混合工作正在成为新常态的世界里,当前的研究考察了远程工作与工作投入之间的关系,以及孤独和希望在这种情况下所扮演的角色。参与者是来自美国和英国的349名员工(170名男性,177名女性,另外两名),年龄在21-69岁之间(M = 38.8, SD = 9.9)。分析确定了一个有调节的中介模型。在孤独感水平较低的员工中,远程工作与工作投入之间没有显著的关系。只有孤独感高、中度的员工,远程工作才会降低工作投入度。这些结果挑战了远程工作削弱员工敬业度的普遍假设。然而,在高度孤独的员工中,希望在远程工作和工作投入之间起着中介作用。增加希望可能是孤独的远程工作者的一种适用的干预措施。本文讨论了研究结果的意义,并提出了提高远程和孤独员工敬业度的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Out of sight but not out of mind: The role of loneliness and hope in remote work and in job engagement

In a world in which remote and hybrid work is becoming the new normal, the current study examines the relationship between remote work and job engagement and the roles that loneliness and hope play in this setting. Participants were 349 employees from the US and UK (170 men, 177 women, and two others), aged 21–69 (M = 38.8, SD = 9.9). The analysis identified a moderated mediation model. Among employees with low levels of loneliness, no significant relationship between remote work and job engagement was found. Remote work predicted decreased job engagement only for employees with high and moderate levels of loneliness. These results challenge the widespread assumption that remote work impairs employee engagement. Yet among employees with high levels of loneliness, hope served as a mediator between remote work and job engagement. Increasing hope may serve as an applicable intervention among lonely remote workers. Implications of our findings are discussed and interventions to increase engagement among remote and lonely employees are suggested.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信