基于模糊认知的坑内倾倒优先的废石管理目标规划——面向可持续开采

IF 10.2 2区 经济学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Ezzeddin Bakhtavar , Sahra Saberi , Guangji Hu , Rehan Sadiq , Kasun Hewage
{"title":"基于模糊认知的坑内倾倒优先的废石管理目标规划——面向可持续开采","authors":"Ezzeddin Bakhtavar ,&nbsp;Sahra Saberi ,&nbsp;Guangji Hu ,&nbsp;Rehan Sadiq ,&nbsp;Kasun Hewage","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Internal (in-pit) dumping is a sustainable waste rock management approach that can mitigate the potential adverse environmental, social, and economic impacts of conventional off-site dumping. In this study, a fuzzy-weighted multi-objective programming model was developed to determine the best feasible waste scheduling strategy. Minimizing waste rock hauling cost, social complaints, environmental penalties, and operational issues are the main objectives of the model. A fuzzy cognitive map was incorporated into the model to analyze the objectives based on their causal relationships. Various weighting scenarios were used to assess the influence of prioritization of objectives on the waste scheduling results. The model was applied to a surface mine containing several lens-shaped limestone deposits. It was found that entirely dumping waste rock in the internal dumps (D1-D3) could lead to the lowest social, environmental, and operational issues under the causal weights of 0.272, 0.267, 0.230, and 0.230 for the social, environmental, economic, and operational objectives, respectively. However, the distances between the extraction sites and internal dumps are large compared to external dumps (K1 and K2), and dumping in the external dumps resulted in significantly more social complaints and environmental effects. A sensitivity analysis on the capacity of the preferred internal dump (D1) indicated that if its capacity is inadequate to accommodate all wastes, the less preferable internal dumps would be used, followed by external dumps.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 104095"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fuzzy cognitive-based goal programming for waste rock management with in-pit dumping priority: Towards sustainable mining\",\"authors\":\"Ezzeddin Bakhtavar ,&nbsp;Sahra Saberi ,&nbsp;Guangji Hu ,&nbsp;Rehan Sadiq ,&nbsp;Kasun Hewage\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Internal (in-pit) dumping is a sustainable waste rock management approach that can mitigate the potential adverse environmental, social, and economic impacts of conventional off-site dumping. In this study, a fuzzy-weighted multi-objective programming model was developed to determine the best feasible waste scheduling strategy. Minimizing waste rock hauling cost, social complaints, environmental penalties, and operational issues are the main objectives of the model. A fuzzy cognitive map was incorporated into the model to analyze the objectives based on their causal relationships. Various weighting scenarios were used to assess the influence of prioritization of objectives on the waste scheduling results. The model was applied to a surface mine containing several lens-shaped limestone deposits. It was found that entirely dumping waste rock in the internal dumps (D1-D3) could lead to the lowest social, environmental, and operational issues under the causal weights of 0.272, 0.267, 0.230, and 0.230 for the social, environmental, economic, and operational objectives, respectively. However, the distances between the extraction sites and internal dumps are large compared to external dumps (K1 and K2), and dumping in the external dumps resulted in significantly more social complaints and environmental effects. A sensitivity analysis on the capacity of the preferred internal dump (D1) indicated that if its capacity is inadequate to accommodate all wastes, the less preferable internal dumps would be used, followed by external dumps.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Policy\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104095\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420723008061\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420723008061","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

内部(坑内)倾倒是一种可持续的废石管理方法,可以减轻传统的场外倾倒对环境、社会和经济的潜在不利影响。本文建立了一个模糊加权多目标规划模型,以确定最佳可行的废物调度策略。最大限度地减少废石运输成本、社会投诉、环境处罚和运营问题是该模型的主要目标。在模型中引入模糊认知图,根据目标之间的因果关系对目标进行分析。采用不同的加权方案来评估目标优先级对废物调度结果的影响。该模型应用于一个含有多个透镜状石灰岩矿床的露天矿。结果表明,在社会、环境、经济和运行目标的因果权重分别为0.272、0.267、0.230和0.230的情况下,区内排土场(d1 ~ d3)完全倾倒废石导致的社会、环境和运行问题最低。然而,与外部排土场(K1和K2)相比,排土场与内部排土场的距离较大,并且在外部排土场倾倒造成的社会投诉和环境影响明显更多。对首选内部排土场容量的敏感性分析(D1)显示,如果其容量不足以容纳所有废物,则会使用较不理想的内部排土场,其次是外部排土场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fuzzy cognitive-based goal programming for waste rock management with in-pit dumping priority: Towards sustainable mining

Internal (in-pit) dumping is a sustainable waste rock management approach that can mitigate the potential adverse environmental, social, and economic impacts of conventional off-site dumping. In this study, a fuzzy-weighted multi-objective programming model was developed to determine the best feasible waste scheduling strategy. Minimizing waste rock hauling cost, social complaints, environmental penalties, and operational issues are the main objectives of the model. A fuzzy cognitive map was incorporated into the model to analyze the objectives based on their causal relationships. Various weighting scenarios were used to assess the influence of prioritization of objectives on the waste scheduling results. The model was applied to a surface mine containing several lens-shaped limestone deposits. It was found that entirely dumping waste rock in the internal dumps (D1-D3) could lead to the lowest social, environmental, and operational issues under the causal weights of 0.272, 0.267, 0.230, and 0.230 for the social, environmental, economic, and operational objectives, respectively. However, the distances between the extraction sites and internal dumps are large compared to external dumps (K1 and K2), and dumping in the external dumps resulted in significantly more social complaints and environmental effects. A sensitivity analysis on the capacity of the preferred internal dump (D1) indicated that if its capacity is inadequate to accommodate all wastes, the less preferable internal dumps would be used, followed by external dumps.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Policy
Resources Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
23.50%
发文量
602
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信