结合结构和序列的二元性:一种使用fsQCA的配置方法

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Xiuxia Sun, Na Rong, Mouxuan Sun, Fang-wei Zhu
{"title":"结合结构和序列的二元性:一种使用fsQCA的配置方法","authors":"Xiuxia Sun, Na Rong, Mouxuan Sun, Fang-wei Zhu","doi":"10.1017/mor.2022.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Structural and sequential ambidexterity are proved to be two prevalent approaches in managing tension between exploration and exploitation. Dominant studies have treated the two approaches as mutually exclusive but have provided less insight about their combination, and the organizational configurations that advance such combination, which is a major meaningful gap explored in the current study. This study aims to explore the configurations of organization design choices to combine structural and sequential approaches from a holistic perspective. We apply fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to analyze the empirical data collected from 102 firms in China. The results show that firms attain high ambidexterity with both separated and blended configurations. Blended ones demonstrate that the structural and sequential approaches can be combined in a way that one approach dominates and the other subordinates. Organizational design mechanisms regarding the configurations for combining structural and sequential approaches are concluded as multielements (complements and substitutes) and multilevels (fit and interaction). These findings are also interpreted through the Chinese ‘Yin-Yang’ framework, which introduces ‘Yin-Yang balancing’ into the ambidexterity literature. 摘要 结构双元与时序双元被证明是缓解组织的探索和利用战略之间冲突关系的两种常见方法。现有的研究认为这两种方法是相互排斥的,对两者的组合以及促进这种组合的组织构型缺乏关注。本研究旨在从整体的角度探索组织设计选择的构型,以实现结构与时序双元的有机联结。本研究运用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)的方法,对102家中国企业的实证数据进行了分析。结果表明,企业可以通过分离构型或混合构型取得高组织双元。其中,混合构型意味着,结构双元和时序双元以一种方法占主导地位、另一种方法为从属的方式进行组合。关于联结结构双元与时序双元构型的组织设计机制被总结为多要素(补充和替代)和多层次(匹配和交互)。最后,本研究尝试将“阴阳平衡”引入双元研究,用中国的“阴阳”框架来解释研究发现。","PeriodicalId":47798,"journal":{"name":"Management and Organization Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining Structural and Sequential Ambidexterity: A Configurational Approach Using fsQCA\",\"authors\":\"Xiuxia Sun, Na Rong, Mouxuan Sun, Fang-wei Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/mor.2022.41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Structural and sequential ambidexterity are proved to be two prevalent approaches in managing tension between exploration and exploitation. Dominant studies have treated the two approaches as mutually exclusive but have provided less insight about their combination, and the organizational configurations that advance such combination, which is a major meaningful gap explored in the current study. This study aims to explore the configurations of organization design choices to combine structural and sequential approaches from a holistic perspective. We apply fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to analyze the empirical data collected from 102 firms in China. The results show that firms attain high ambidexterity with both separated and blended configurations. Blended ones demonstrate that the structural and sequential approaches can be combined in a way that one approach dominates and the other subordinates. Organizational design mechanisms regarding the configurations for combining structural and sequential approaches are concluded as multielements (complements and substitutes) and multilevels (fit and interaction). These findings are also interpreted through the Chinese ‘Yin-Yang’ framework, which introduces ‘Yin-Yang balancing’ into the ambidexterity literature. 摘要 结构双元与时序双元被证明是缓解组织的探索和利用战略之间冲突关系的两种常见方法。现有的研究认为这两种方法是相互排斥的,对两者的组合以及促进这种组合的组织构型缺乏关注。本研究旨在从整体的角度探索组织设计选择的构型,以实现结构与时序双元的有机联结。本研究运用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)的方法,对102家中国企业的实证数据进行了分析。结果表明,企业可以通过分离构型或混合构型取得高组织双元。其中,混合构型意味着,结构双元和时序双元以一种方法占主导地位、另一种方法为从属的方式进行组合。关于联结结构双元与时序双元构型的组织设计机制被总结为多要素(补充和替代)和多层次(匹配和交互)。最后,本研究尝试将“阴阳平衡”引入双元研究,用中国的“阴阳”框架来解释研究发现。\",\"PeriodicalId\":47798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management and Organization Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management and Organization Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2022.41\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management and Organization Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2022.41","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

结构和顺序双灵巧性被证明是处理勘探和开发之间紧张关系的两种常用方法。主流研究将这两种方法视为相互排斥的,但对它们的结合以及促进这种结合的组织结构提供的见解较少,这是当前研究中探索的一个重要的有意义的差距。本研究旨在从整体的角度探讨组织设计选择的配置,以结合结构方法和顺序方法。本文运用模糊集定性比较分析法(fsQCA)对中国102家企业的实证数据进行了分析。结果表明,无论是分离配置还是混合配置,企业都能获得较高的双灵巧性。混合方法表明,结构方法和顺序方法可以以一种方法占主导地位,另一种方法从属的方式结合起来。将结构方法和顺序方法相结合的组织设计机制可以归纳为多元素(互补和替代)和多层次(契合和相互作用)。这些发现也可以通过中国的“阴阳”框架来解释,该框架将“阴阳平衡”引入了双重性文献。摘要 结构双元与时序双元被证明是缓解组织的探索和利用战略之间冲突关系的两种常见方法。现有的研究认为这两种方法是相互排斥的,对两者的组合以及促进这种组合的组织构型缺乏关注。本研究旨在从整体的角度探索组织设计选择的构型,以实现结构与时序双元的有机联结。(fsQCA); (fsQCA);结果表明,企业可以通过分离构型或混合构型取得高组织双元。其中,混合构型意味着,结构双元和时序双元以一种方法占主导地位、另一种方法为从属的方式进行组合。关于联结结构双元与时序双元构型的组织设计机制被总结为多要素(补充和替代)和多层次(匹配和交互)。最后,本研究尝试将“阴阳平衡”引入双元研究,用中国的“阴阳”框架来解释研究发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combining Structural and Sequential Ambidexterity: A Configurational Approach Using fsQCA
ABSTRACT Structural and sequential ambidexterity are proved to be two prevalent approaches in managing tension between exploration and exploitation. Dominant studies have treated the two approaches as mutually exclusive but have provided less insight about their combination, and the organizational configurations that advance such combination, which is a major meaningful gap explored in the current study. This study aims to explore the configurations of organization design choices to combine structural and sequential approaches from a holistic perspective. We apply fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to analyze the empirical data collected from 102 firms in China. The results show that firms attain high ambidexterity with both separated and blended configurations. Blended ones demonstrate that the structural and sequential approaches can be combined in a way that one approach dominates and the other subordinates. Organizational design mechanisms regarding the configurations for combining structural and sequential approaches are concluded as multielements (complements and substitutes) and multilevels (fit and interaction). These findings are also interpreted through the Chinese ‘Yin-Yang’ framework, which introduces ‘Yin-Yang balancing’ into the ambidexterity literature. 摘要 结构双元与时序双元被证明是缓解组织的探索和利用战略之间冲突关系的两种常见方法。现有的研究认为这两种方法是相互排斥的,对两者的组合以及促进这种组合的组织构型缺乏关注。本研究旨在从整体的角度探索组织设计选择的构型,以实现结构与时序双元的有机联结。本研究运用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)的方法,对102家中国企业的实证数据进行了分析。结果表明,企业可以通过分离构型或混合构型取得高组织双元。其中,混合构型意味着,结构双元和时序双元以一种方法占主导地位、另一种方法为从属的方式进行组合。关于联结结构双元与时序双元构型的组织设计机制被总结为多要素(补充和替代)和多层次(匹配和交互)。最后,本研究尝试将“阴阳平衡”引入双元研究,用中国的“阴阳”框架来解释研究发现。
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信